Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

Made-to-Order People


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> Made-to-Order People Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 2:26:25 PM   
aeaa


Posts: 125
Joined: 4/8/2007
Status: offline
Greetings Masters and Mistresses,
Greetings girls,
 
There is a current topic that seems to be everywhere in newspapers, news sites and magazines that aea reads.  In one form or another it seems that there is an increased interest in "designer babies."  These babies can be "designed" to have particular features (i.e. blonde hair, blue eyes) or to even have what most would consider to be particular defects or disabilities.   aea will, of course, provide links to some of these articles for those interested in reading further.
 
aea has found herself struggling with the morality of this issue and if it indeed goes against what is natural.  Having strong Gorean beliefs, aea's first reaction was indeed that this is morally wrong! It goes against what nature has intended! And yet, she thought back to her reading:
 
quote:

"Ho-Hak’s right ear twitched. His ears were unusual, very large, and with extremely long lower lobes, drawn lower still by small, heavy pendants set in them. He had been a slave, doubtless, and doubtless, judging by the collar, and the large hands and broad back, had served on the galleys, but he had been an unusual slave, a bred exotic, doubtless originally intended by the slave maters for a destiny higher than that of the galley bench.

There are various types of "exotics" bred by Gorean slavers, all of whom are to be distinguished from more normal varieties of bred slaves, such as a Passion Slaves and Draft Slaves. Exotics may be bred for almost any purpose, and some of these purposes, unfortunately, seem to be little more than to produce quaint or unusual specimens. Ho-Hak may well have been one so bred.

"You are an exotic," I said to him.

Ho-Hak’s ears leaned forward toward me, but he did not seem angry. He had brown hair, and brown eyes; the hair, long, was tied behind his head with a string of rence cloth. He wore a sleeveless tunic of rence cloth, like most of the rence growers.

"Yes," said Ho-Hak. "I was bred for a collector."

 
Does this then make such scientific experiments and research Gorean in nature? aea has had to consider this.  she's concluded for herself that it doesn't matter to her much if it is "Gorean" or not.  she does feel it goes against nature.
 
However, she also realized that in doing such perhaps in time society would be populated by the "fittest" so to speak.  If genes of the most intelligent, healthy, strongest of our species were to be passed on without in-breeding, in turn we'd have a more intelligent and healthy society.

What has most frightened aea in all of this is that there are people who desire to have babies designed with the same disabilities or defects of the parents in order to make it easier for their parents to raise them.  aea cannot agree one single bit with this.  she thinks it is cruel.  Which makes her again reconsider the morality of all of it.
 
And lastly, would we soon then have "collectors" of babies as well? Having babies bred as a sort of side-show collection?
 
she begs please to know the thoughts of others on this very volatile moral issue.
 
Links of interest are:
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16599217/
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16299656/
 
aea wishes you well
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 2:38:59 PM   
cariad


Posts: 943
Joined: 9/25/2004
From: Calgary, Alberta
Status: offline
Greetings aeaa:

~smiles~

i am of the belief that if the Powers that be wanted perfection there would be no war, no famine, no hurricanes, no tornadoes and no floods. However, because the Powers that be created each of us individually and with the capability to form our own thoughts, i feel that it is wrong to genetically alter a baby before it is conceived or born.

There is no such thing as perfect as per the way society thinks, however that being said it is my opinion that we are each perfect in our own ways, if that makes any sense.

to me genetically altering a child goes against everything i believe in.

i wish you well
cariad

_____________________________

The Path To Being A Good slave Takes Hard Work, A Willingness To Learn, Ability To Take Criticism and the Ability To Take Punishments Well. i Am Still Learning So Please Be Patient With me, As i Walk the Path to Being A good slave. SLRN: 742 958 000

(in reply to aeaa)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 3:50:10 PM   
justinasamerk


Posts: 153
Joined: 8/1/2006
Status: offline
greetings aeaa,
one can look at genetically altering babies in two ways...a means of casting out undesirable traits, such as diabetes, natural born diseases, disabilities, flaws, and it may help expand the desirable traits such as Health, beauty, physical physique, longevity.

However who is it to determine what a "Desirable" trait is. Historically speaking every generation there is a social group out there that sets to erraticate a more "inferior" group, (and for those ignorant to believe..this is the age of *coughs* Terrorism)

For her the morality issue doesn't lie in altering the gene pool, because health care, disease, and problematic issues that arise due to our genetic encoding, rather then the person who desides what traits are keepers and what is not.
Who is to determine that "blonde hair and blue eyes is desirable" who is to determine that only "skinny" people is a desirable trait. It is scary to think that soon you can create and order your child based on certain characteristics as if they are a specialty item in a fast food restaurant.

As for the gorean perspective, slaves were animals, and currently we do breed animals and genetically alter them for the desirability, whether its chickens for bigger breasts, or cows for their milk, even farming fish and other type of sea life. We do it now, just not in the name of humans. Eventually it probably will be the norm to farm humans to.

Those are just a few of her thoughts, very good question aeaa....she is sure it would bring a lot of debate on this topic.

to all the mothers out there, have a very happy mothers day,
sincerely,
justina

(in reply to aeaa)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 4:41:37 PM   
Camerius


Posts: 742
Joined: 9/5/2006
Status: offline

Would you raise a child knowing that it would live in pain or not for very long, as an side effect from an genetic fault?

Do you approve or condone abortion?

Do you find it right or accept that there's, as have been mentioned, geneticly altered bread animal to further food consumption and/or for personal affection/use?


Some Goreans approved of breading slaves for whatever reasons that they had, Ho-Hak was an Exotic, too there's mentioning of bred female slaves that never have seen a man in the books.

All this from there being a marked for it, is that right or wrong? It's an personal moral issue to be taken, just like what I wrote at the start at this post...each of those are an personal choice to take, and personal moral issue to get to grips with.

Now, if you go back some 50+ years there already was an ongoing designing plan to cover allof a whole race, while at the same time trying to eradicate what they saw as lesser or unworthy people, traits or even raceial backgrounds. They didn't get very far, how ever hard they tried, but at that time and within that moral understanding that they held, what was done was right.

Was that right to do so or was that wrong?

I can understand your feeling that what is going on is against nature, but thing is...nature is changeing all the time, makeing animals, plants and so on better, or letting them die out from not being able to survive.
It's only when we, the humans, start to putting out hands into that pot that things goes haywire.

Just sometimes, there's a good reasons as to why we do so....not that all will like it or agree with it, but that is an personal conclusion that we'll have to face when or if we ever get there.


Be well

  Camerius














_____________________________

"To Gorean morality many Earth moralities might ask, "Why so hard?" To these Earth moralities, the Gorean ethos might ask, "Why so soft?" Marauders of Gor, pg.8

(in reply to aeaa)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 6:37:27 PM   
noyeh


Posts: 501
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
Greetings Masters,
Greetings Mistresses,
Greetings fellow slaves,

I don't believe in using and abusing genetic's. Nature gave us our traits for certain reasons. Going against mother nature just to aquire a certain quality makes the produced item a freak of man-made quaility . Its just not right. I just don't believe in it. I believe science was given to us by a higher power and that too many people abuse this privilage. Nature has its freaks of natures for special reasons and I think each person whether they are in pain or not was created for a specific reason. To  design them out to wipe them out goes against the natural codes.  I just don't believe in messing with nature. We come up with cures everyday that help solve some of the issues mentioned. Messing with our genetic's is asking for future problems.

wishing everyone well,

< Message edited by noyeh -- 5/13/2007 6:39:13 PM >


_____________________________

personal slave of Master Jeff the Seeker
His property slave slut and pet
His concubine/first girl of the House of the Seeker

noyeh-JtS-fg

(in reply to Camerius)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 7:13:51 PM   
pashafewj


Posts: 54
Joined: 4/8/2007
Status: offline
Greetings,
 
pasha just recently viewed a  1997 movie starring Ethan Hawke called "Gattaca". The story line was the genetic altering of embryos so that parents could chose the traits and abilities they desired in their children and erradicate defects. Ofcourse there were parents that did not agree with this and would take a chance with a natural unaltered child. It was most interesting seeing how the face of discrimination never really changes regardless of how "advanced" society becomes~

< Message edited by pashafewj -- 5/13/2007 7:15:07 PM >


_____________________________

far-sæla,
pasha


“How does one become a butterfly?" she asked. "You must want to fly so much that you are willing to give up being a caterpillar.”


(in reply to noyeh)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/13/2007 8:25:21 PM   
ownedkitten


Posts: 200
Joined: 4/2/2007
Status: offline
Greetings Masters,
Greetings Mistresses,
Greetings to those who serve,

The idea of this does not sit well with me.  While I can see the "positives" of it in terms of medical issues and the like, I do not feel that we should "play God."  As noyeh mentioned, we can use science to help us treat diseases and disorders...but I do not think it should be a way to eradicate them completely.   There is a natural progression/evolution of the species for a reason, I believe.


_____________________________

"I don't mind living in a man's world as long as I can be a woman in it." -Marilyn Monroe

(in reply to pashafewj)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/14/2007 2:07:47 AM   
mystiquenz


Posts: 330
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline
Greetings Masters,
Greetings Mistresses,
Greetings slaves,

There have been animals genetically modified.  As to the point, this girl not too sure.  In New Zealand there was a sheep, but there must be other animals as well. 

The whole area of law that is perceived around "engineering" is a mindfield to this girl, and she must say that she has not studied it any depth.  One day she says, she might be able to get her head around the process, but until then she thinks it is best left to the scholars. 

Who was the world leader that wanted to only allow the boys with blonde hair and blue eyes to survive and all others to be gone?  If this cloning was available, back then, where would our society be now?  What wars would have been lost or won, and would we be fighting different kind of wars and would there be another kind of unrest?  Or would there be a different form of society to protect? 

In response to Master Carmerius's post, there have been methods for a very long time, to ascertain whether an unborn child was going to be a downs syndrome baby or be severely handicapped due to a chromonsomal or genetic disorder of some description.  Whether a parent chooses to allow their baby to live and die, or to be aborted to save their baby from an unpleasant outcome, is really not a matter for others to be concerned with.  The judgement is with the parents, and this girl is of the opinion that unless those who have the full facts, are best not to cast an opinion yet alone a judgement.  Unborn babies, if they are unwell, normally are miscarried by their mother anyway, in the natural course of events, but nevertheless there are instances, where medical people have bridged the gap, and not given the unborn baby, nor the parents the right to choose.  Call it what you will, but this girl calls it chance. 

Life is a game of chance, you often hear that expression flaunted around, so you take the good, the bad and the indifferent.  You live in the now, not yesteryear or tomorrow. 

mystique wishes all well.



_____________________________

blessings
~mystique~

(in reply to ownedkitten)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/14/2007 6:27:41 AM   
MercTech


Posts: 874
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
There was a name for breeding humans to eliminate undesireable traits, eugenics.  It was a very popular study back in the early part of the 20th century.  Then there was one country that tried to use it and went fully into the concept.  They rounded up people with what they considered undesirable traits and put them in camps.  Then, the systematically set about removing those with undesireable traits from the gene pool.

What are "undesirable traits"?  Birth defects?  Congenital disease?  Having Jewish blood?

We remember them as Nazis and the term eugenics has come to refer to something very vile and nasty.  But, few remember where the concept of improving the human gene pool led back in the 1930s when taken to the ultimate.

Stefan

(in reply to mystiquenz)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/14/2007 3:08:17 PM   
Saffleur


Posts: 247
Joined: 8/14/2006
From: Lenoir NC
Status: offline
The exptics in the books were not done like what we see today. They were done by eugenics. Selective breeding to produce slaves with full lips etc. It was not a genetic modification done while the child is in the womb.

I personally do not feel that it should be done. Children will be born as they should. It is part of nature. Would I want my child struck with some genetic disorder that would hamper them for life, of course not.

As said before there are ways to determine if a child will have certain disorders etc just by taking a bit of the embiotic fluid through the navel. You can then decide whether you wish to keep said child or not.

I don't condone abortion either. so it's really a choice of the parents.


_____________________________

When we see men of worth, we should think of equaling them; when we see men of a contrary character, we should turn inward and examine ourselves.

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 3:59:46 PM   
kimberlyrenee


Posts: 38
Joined: 4/19/2007
Status: offline
Greetings Masters,
Greetings Mistresses,
Greetings slaves,

This girl has actually given thought to this topic in the past. Being someone with a genetic malady that has caused her great suffering over the years has naturally led her mind to "what if's".

If this girl be honest and disregard any relation with a higher power and His grand scheme, yes, she would have preferred to have these things removed from her genetic make up long before she drew breath in this world. Can anyone stand before a child dying of cancer and tell them they could cure the wee one but chose to let mother nature do her thing?

We alter mother nature daily with vaccines, surgery, therapy and in so many other ways. Yes, there will always be horror stories of evil use, but would that not also be balanced with the good of healthy children who will never feel the pain of a cancer eating at them or of a disability that leaves them at a unique disadvantage to their peers or as was termed in this thread "freaks of nature". Presume you have a unique child and an adult calls your beloved child a "freak of nature". Would you have truly not changed that in the womb if you knew you could have?

Please don't think this girl believes that those who are different are worthless. Quite the opposite, actually. Far too often the worth of the different ones is over looked and ridiculed. This girl has more than once had her heart warmed by such a person and has been reminded of the special gifts that they bring to the world.

All said, its just an opinion and probably not a very popular one at that. This one wishes all well and is grateful for permission to post.

kimberly

< Message edited by kimberlyrenee -- 5/15/2007 4:02:02 PM >

(in reply to Saffleur)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 6:45:40 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cariad

i am of the belief that if the Powers that be wanted perfection there would be no war, no famine, no hurricanes, no tornadoes and no floods.


How could there be perfection without hardship? Is it not opposition that forces us to thrive and to better ourselves?

Let's also not forget the important point of contrast: without up, there is no down; without light, no shadows are cast; without Self, there is no Other.

Similarly, without flaws, there cannot be perfection.

quote:

However, because the Powers that be created each of us individually and with the capability to form our own thoughts, i feel that it is wrong to genetically alter a baby before it is conceived or born.


I have reservations about genetic alteration, despite being a transhumanist; I prefer for current, living humans to transcend humanity, rather than leaving that to future generations. I'm not sure I share your reservation about thought; it is a matter of what one changes.

If you change the central nervous system, then, yes, I'd object to that, as we'd quickly lose out on a lot of people who could make important contributions; for instance, Einstein was bipolar, something that could likely be screened for soon, which is a trait that undoubtedly contributed to his discoveries and his unique way of thinking.

Preventing the occurence of Down's syndrome, fatal familial insomnia and other inherited diseases, as well as preventing neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, could also not, IMO, be considered interfering with their thoughts.

quote:

to me genetically altering a child goes against everything i believe in.


We all believe differently in various regards, and people's feelings are often strongly aroused when children are involved. Mine are not.

My objection is to interfering with free will or the cognitive processes from which it originates, although I would not object to genetically engineering an ovum and spermcell without prior fertilization in such a way.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to cariad)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 7:08:09 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: justinasamerk

However who is it to determine what a "Desirable" trait is. Historically speaking every generation there is a social group out there that sets to erraticate a more "inferior" group, (and for those ignorant to believe..this is the age of *coughs* Terrorism)


Terrorism isn't particularly relevant to the question at hand.

But, yes, spot-on. Determining what is desireable is a big can of worms. Also, let us not forget that genetic diversity is the cure for the vulnerabilities of monoculture.

If we eradicate a certain trait, we may find, later, that the same genes are associated with some vital survival mechanism. Turns out, for instance, that the people who survived the bubonic plague had a mutation that just happens to grant near-immunity to HIV. Retroactively altering the genetic material of a living being is a lot more complex than altering that of a single cell.

quote:

It is scary to think that soon you can create and order your child based on certain characteristics as if they are a specialty item in a fast food restaurant.


Manufacturing appearance is not viable. It depends on too many factors. We'd need to find a way to grow them in tanks instead, then, under controlled circumstances. And they'd need a special diet to get the exact height desired. Even then, I'm not sure you could order them to spec.

I don't see anything intrinsically scary about the concept. The scary things are monoculture, social dysgenics and so forth. We don't have the understanding of our genome required to isolate genes specifically enough to make sure there isn't anything else attached to those genes, so the monoculture risk can't be avoided at this stage. Dysgenics is very scary, but only in the sense that it accelerates the existing trend.

quote:

As for the gorean perspective, slaves were animals, and currently we do breed animals and genetically alter them for the desirability, whether its chickens for bigger breasts, or cows for their milk, even farming fish and other type of sea life. We do it now, just not in the name of humans. Eventually it probably will be the norm to farm humans to.


Eventually, yes, provided humans still procreate and die at the time. Let's hope not.

But the idea of genetically engineering a slave caste when we get to the point where we have the prerequisite understanding of the genetics involved is kind of interesting. I don't think any observer of human nature and history can believe that we won't do just that either way, so extending the discussion to involve the potential for genetically engineering personal slaves is only natural.

As I pointed out earlier, if we modify the ovum and sperm prior to fertilization, any argument of a religious/spiritual nature is lost, as there is no opportunity for a soul, at least within the more familiar religions.

As I also pointed out earlier, I don't have a problem with modifying the genes that will result in thought processes in just that way. If the slave is engineered in such a way as to desire slavery, and to find happiness/fullfilment of that role, the ethical problems are quite a lot simpified, possibly to the point where it can be defended.

The implications for both Gorean lifestyles and BDSM lifestyles are interesting, to say the least, although I expect there would be a lot of resistance to it, at least initially.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to justinasamerk)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 7:19:48 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ownedkitten

While I can see the "positives" of it in terms of medical issues and the like, I do not feel that we should "play God."


A bit late for that, I should think: we "play G*d" every day.

quote:

As noyeh mentioned, we can use science to help us treat diseases and disorders...but I do not think it should be a way to eradicate them completely.


Regardless of how we feel about it, there's a simple fact that remains: we will.

Unless you consider it acceptable for a single nation, or a group of nations, to conquer the entire world and enforce their view, someone will do it, and the rest have to either keep up, or fall behind. Science opens up a can of worms, but there's no way of putting the genie back in the bottle without applying the threat of force.

quote:

There is a natural progression/evolution of the species for a reason, I believe.


Evolution does not have, or need, a reason.

Evolution is not a mechanism, a tool, or even (in some senses) a process.

Evolution is an observation.

The observation is this: what prevails, prevails; what dies, dies. And in the presence of competition, the fit usually prevail, while the unfit usually die; these things tend toward better fitness for a given environment. Humans are a bit different, in the sense that we take some measures to prevent the latter, and out ideas of "fit" are more social constructs than anything else, but the general observation is the same, although there are strong dysgenic tendencies present.

The theory of evolution is an attempt at making one or more models to fit these observations. We must not confuse the model with what it is attempting to model.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to ownedkitten)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 7:27:50 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Saffleur

The exptics in the books were not done like what we see today. They were done by eugenics. Selective breeding to produce slaves with full lips etc. It was not a genetic modification done while the child is in the womb.


Whether I pick up a gun and shoot someone, or hire someone else to shoot that someone, the net result is the same: the person got shot. The specifics are unimportant with regards to what conceptually happened.

Selective breeding is the same thing as genetic modification, just less specific, and more prone to cause suffering, as one of the most effective methods of strengthening desireable traits, as well as eliminating undesireable ones, is inbreeding. The observation that there will be a greater tendency for people to have "unfit" offspring led to the banning of inbreeding in most human cultures; however, what inbreeding really does, is to quickly weed out those traits that are undesired, as they accumulate quickly to the point where unviable lines die out, and strengthen those traits that are desireable, as those accumulate just as quickly.

The only difference is that genetic modification is, IIRC, currently done with an already fertilized egg, which opens the door to questions that science doesn't address (i.e. religious concerns). While it is harder to modify the ovum and sperm seperately, it can be done, and this would achieve a conceptually identical procedure to selective breeding.

And selective breeding goes on every day.

Some people get to breed more than others, and some traits are more likely to get you into a situation where you can produce offspring than other traits.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Saffleur)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 8:02:27 PM   
Saffleur


Posts: 247
Joined: 8/14/2006
From: Lenoir NC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saffleur

The exptics in the books were not done like what we see today. They were done by eugenics. Selective breeding to produce slaves with full lips etc. It was not a genetic modification done while the child is in the womb.


Whether I pick up a gun and shoot someone, or hire someone else to shoot that someone, the net result is the same: the person got shot. The specifics are unimportant with regards to what conceptually happened.

Selective breeding is the same thing as genetic modification, just less specific, and more prone to cause suffering, as one of the most effective methods of strengthening desireable traits, as well as eliminating undesireable ones, is inbreeding. The observation that there will be a greater tendency for people to have "unfit" offspring led to the banning of inbreeding in most human cultures; however, what inbreeding really does, is to quickly weed out those traits that are undesired, as they accumulate quickly to the point where unviable lines die out, and strengthen those traits that are desireable, as those accumulate just as quickly.

The only difference is that genetic modification is, IIRC, currently done with an already fertilized egg, which opens the door to questions that science doesn't address (i.e. religious concerns). While it is harder to modify the ovum and sperm seperately, it can be done, and this would achieve a conceptually identical procedure to selective breeding.

And selective breeding goes on every day.

Some people get to breed more than others, and some traits are more likely to get you into a situation where you can produce offspring than other traits.


I never said that the end result wasn't the same. I simply pointed out that it is done a completely different way. Eugenics goes along lines of selective breeding. The specifics are important. Genetic modification that is done today is more efficient than selective breeding. It takes years to get the right gene mockup with a higher risk of mutation. Genetic modification has a completely different basis on which they take known genes and alter then getting a desired, expected result.

In the long run, sure, same result, but one has a better chance of succeeding short term.


_____________________________

When we see men of worth, we should think of equaling them; when we see men of a contrary character, we should turn inward and examine ourselves.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 8:55:53 PM   
ehmCB


Posts: 44
Joined: 12/31/2006
Status: offline
greetings Masters
greetings Mistresses
greetings slave


m can see the pros and cons in altering genetics. for wanting to not want a child that will be affected by something that will change its life not for the good, yes m can see doing that. but just to have alter ones genetics to make sure that you have a child born with green eyes or whatever..no. but, what would happen if something were to occur during the pregnancy that would affect the child?
m went thru this with her first son who was born very premature. how many would make the decision that m had to make? to let him live on life suppoert knowing that he was dying. knowing from what the drs. had told her. how many would choose to have the life support removed? yes, m made that decision and the morning that it was to be removed, he died before it was done.
so to have a child that would be genteically altered does not mean that all will be well. we are born to do one thing in this life and that is to die but what we do between being born and dying is what life is all about.


well wishes


_____________________________

www.streetofbrands.com


The collar is put on from without, but what it encircles comes from within. Slavery, true slavery, comes from within.
~17 Savages of Gor, pg. 210

(in reply to aeaa)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 9:06:55 PM   
Invictus754


Posts: 521
Joined: 12/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aeaa
It goes against what nature has intended!


Tal, y'all (being from North Carolina has its benefits)
 
So aea, you must detest surgery which has nothing nature intended.  If a wound was meant to heal - it would.  Why suture a wound closed when that goes against nature? 
 
It is man's nature to bend every aspect of His life to His bidding.  If He finds that He can bend to His will even the stuff from which life springs - so be it.


_____________________________

You never know your limits, until you push them
If slavery is a gift, the Africans were pretty fucking generous in the 1700 and 1800s, weren't they?

(in reply to aeaa)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/15/2007 10:17:42 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ehmCB

we are born to do one thing in this life and that is to die but what we do between being born and dying is what life is all about.


Not everyone agrees with the position that we are born to die; e.g. me.

Some have argued that it is an intrinsic aspect of the human condition, which I'm not sure if I disagree with, but there are those of us who feel the human condition is a limit to be transcended, not something to be celebrated.

Eliminating a few basic problems such as aging, cancer and so forth wouldn't be a bad idea, IMO, and would make a significant dent in the "everything dies" truism, although unfortunately, the general acceptance of death (to the point where several have described modern society as a death cult, which I'd tend to agree with to some extent) makes it hard for legitimate research to be done in that field.

Genetics might be a way to sneak it in through the back door, though.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to ehmCB)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Made-to-Order People - 5/16/2007 5:03:02 AM   
aeaa


Posts: 125
Joined: 4/8/2007
Status: offline
Greetings Master Invictus754,
Greetings Masters & Mistresses,
Greetings girls,
 
That was a rather large leap that you took,  Master in concluding that aea must detest sutures to heal surgery.
 
The entire quote in the context of her post was that those words were one of aea's initial reactions, Master, but that she has been thinking further upon it and struggling with the morality of it.  Yes, it does go against nature anytime humans interfere, Master, even with medicine. Or does it? Isn't it natural that some people have the abilities to discover and apply such discoveries? Therein is aea's conundrum.
 
What aea does find morally reprehensible is the fact that there are those that want to use such research and discovery to be sure that babies ARE born with defects and disabilities they may not have otherwise have had.  aea believes that is morally wrong.  
 
she begs mercy if her stance on this topic was made unclear. Perhaps, it is due to the fact that she is still struggling with it.  she is much enjoying the views of others and finds they are giving her new points to ponder upon.
 
aea wishes you well.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16599217/
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16299656/

< Message edited by aeaa -- 5/16/2007 5:52:10 AM >

(in reply to Invictus754)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> Made-to-Order People Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

3.250