Grlwithboy -> RE: "I disagree" "Shut up, slave" (7/14/2007 4:14:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad quote:
ORIGINAL: susie quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote:
ORIGINAL: susie quote:
ORIGINAL: akbarbarian Just hope your Dom doesn't train you not to disagree by using an electric shock obedience collar on you. My slave wears one. She agrees much more often than she used to. Well, unless you want to find out how good you are at agreeing that is. Oh Good Lord! Are you really surprised? No I guess not given what I have read so far. And I think the word I would use now is worried rather than surprised and I am sure I am not the only one! The only thing I'm worried about is the electric shock collar. Those are really tricky to get right. Even the companies that make them for law enforcement (yes, they have been used in prisons and trials) have trouble making them safe. The number of accidental discharges have been equal to the number of intentional discharges so far. And the main manufacturer went out of business due to problems with their products. An electric shock collar must be designed for the right species, have proper I/V limiting with fail-open defaults, and even then you will risk triggering a vasovagal reaction. Most cases of vasovagal reactions will just lead to a 30% drop in BP and/or heart rate, IIRC. But some people do not have a functioning limiter there, causing it to drop to nil. Quite simply, it isn't particularly safe. That said, it doesn't have to be. If both parties have agreed to that level of risk, it's all good. Personally, I was thinking more along the lines of a stun bracelet, the kind you wear on the upper arm. Those can range from an "odd sensation" to being outright incapacitating with pain, and will be miles safer than a collar, at any setting. That said, I'd not use it to stifle disagreements. As others have pointed out, it's how one disagrees that matters, not whether one disagrees. At least for me. Getting into a shouting match just messes up everyone's day, and shutting it down until people have cooled off will usually help things in the long run. Doing it when presented with a respectful disagreement will usually be negative. Without regard to the subjective opinion on this that I may have, I have seen and have reason to believe that one can reduce risk and still deliver a good negative stimulus to a healthy and average individual by placing said collar around their thigh. I hope if they're not playing with it in that manner at present they're at least open to that adjustment. It's a risk I didn't want to take on people I've felt pretty dispassionate about - I don't especially have a fetish for dominant chicks with criminal records and small enclosed cages, if you catch my drift.
|
|
|
|