Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Free women?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Free women? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Free women? - 9/21/2007 5:56:00 PM   
Sepharus


Posts: 12
Joined: 7/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fyreOmega

a Gorean poly home is a family.
Gorean men dont 'hook up'-
they Own and keep and take care of what is theirs.
we do not have a kajira corner where any ole Master takes us for usuage then drops us off and goes back home to his FC cause he got his baser animal desires out of his system for a few.



While the spirit of this post applies to many, I would have to argue that it does not apply to the whole. In My own home we have no slaves. My FC wife is of the thought that one doesnt bring the cows nor the pigs into the home nor should one bring ones slaves.

We have a second residence we affectionately refer to as "The Kennel". My wifes time there often exceeds my own as a good deal of my girls training is in her hands. She has little use for the pleasures of putting my girl to use, however, as a FC She takes great pride in teaching my girl her place and position.

I, Myself, am not one to share my treasures. So I will personally agree with the quoted posts stance that "hook up" and "poly swapping" references do not apply to MY personal application of Gorean philosophy.....I am acquainted with a Man who owns a home specifically for entertaining....He refers to as "The Tavern". While some may not approve of the concept, many do not approve of Gor in any of its applications here.


(in reply to fyreOmega)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Free women? - 9/21/2007 7:20:46 PM   
Totalmaster4you


Posts: 1359
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
Tal to the Free and property,
Greetings xoxi,
In reading this post, xoxi, I realized that you have a considerable amout to learn about what a FC is, a kajira is and who you are. I do realize that may sound presumptive of me but I do not say this in a perjorative way. I can only speak for myself as one who tries to live gorean. However in the books and the way I live, a gorean Master is always looking for ways to increase the value of ones property. The attributes you mentioned; confidence, pride and self respect are qualities I look for in a slave. For example confidence in that you can constantly strive to reach for perfection, pride in everything you do for your Master is the best that you can do and self respect that you are being true to who you are inside and are living that each day. As for modesty that is for Masters to determain what's appropriate for any given time or situation. I do beleive that these are things you will discover the more you learn about goreans and that gorean men fit the image you have in your head of who you wish to be with and is why you are here. I would suggest in the future that you stop trying to fit yourself into a label, don't see yourself as a submissive or slave and just be open to being who you are.
I wish you well,
TM4Y

_____________________________

Sometime ago I decided it was time to change my nic. However I didn't wish to disconnect from my original profile. Since then I've signed Touch your mind (TYM or Tym). Opinions in my posts should be taken as my opinion and my opinion only.

(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Free women? - 9/21/2007 7:58:02 PM   
MrDiscipline44


Posts: 1776
Joined: 1/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kateryn

Perhaps its cause FW acting "slutty" would be considered to be "courting the collar"?
That would depend on the man who happened upon her, now wouldn't it.. But we're not talking about free women in general. We're talking about free companions specifically.

_____________________________

If you love somebody, you have to be willing to break them.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

Have you slapped your slave today?

(in reply to Kateryn)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Free women? - 9/22/2007 7:29:53 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Joined: 8/14/2006
Status: offline
That is very true TM4Y - this is definitely something I'm still learning about.

I guess this post was shaped by reading another thread - http://www.collarchat.com/m_1183127/tm.htm

Just a few of the quotes that stuck out in my mind - there are plenty more but I don't want to make this one post 3 pages long

I guess the main difference that I saw in this thread is that a slave's purpose is to please *men*whereas a FC's was to please one man, her companion, and devote herself to his name, his family, and the future of their offspring rather than men - the gender as a whole.

I definitely do have to do more research, but I just wanted to explain where my starting point was with these thoughts...thank you for your reply and advice.  It was quite accurate

quote:

So, I think a Free Woman is best defined by what she is not - a slave.  A slave is a woman who aches with the desire to obey and please men, and she does so without limitation....While her master can compel her loyalty to him, she is also completely willing to sexually please any man her master orders or allows, in any way he chooses to allow. 
A slave's complete purpose in life is to obey and please men.
-Trevelyan


quote:

When my grandmother was a girl, if you asked her her name she would have told you "Sybil Winters".  By the time I knew her she would have answered the same question "Mrs. Avery Hastings".  Not even "Sybil Hastings". 

To her way of thinking, she was the female half of a partnership in my Grandfather's good name, and she acted like it.  She had the same pride in that name that he did, and together, though they played different parts in carrying on that good name, they did so. Together.  They built a life, and a home, and a family.  After he died, she carried on that good name, and was in many ways one of the lynch-pins that kept the family that they built together.  She was a free woman.  She was her husband's partner in freedom, and self-reliance, and self-determination.  She lived and died in her own way, with her head high, always a partner in his good name.

Edana is not a partner in my name.  She is a slave girl.  If you ask her her name, she will reply with the name that I put on her as a slave.  She will most likely live in my collar a very long time, but always as a slave in my household.  If she is a fine slave, she will be kept, and valued, and enjoyed, perhaps even cherished, but always as property, not as a partner.

-Leonidas


quote:

Once a Gorean slave becomes a slave and "the slave fires are lit in her belly" she is helpless in the grip of her needs.  If denied, she will beg even the slightest touch of any man.  That is mentioned repeatedly in the books.  She will gladly open her legs to any man that she is ordered to or allowed to.  But, she is kept on slave wine so that she cannot conceive.

A Free Woman, on the other hand, will only have sex with her Free Companion.   (I know that various Free Woman had sex with Jason when he was a slave, but none of them were companioned, and I am sure I will eventually understand why that sex was ok.)  They are "trustworthy" in that a man can be certain that any infant his Free Companion bears is his.

-Trevelyan


quote:

If answering the demands of those slave fires by devoting herself to obeying and pleasing men is a womans top priority, she is a slave.  If she has another higher priority - husband, children, career, you name it, she is a free woman.  She can still be sensual and sexual, but if she is companioned it is only with her companion.  (I am not prepared to discuss the sexuality of Free Women who are not companioned.  I do not understand enough of that yet.  Perhaps someone else will comment and I will benefit.)

Third, I think a Free Woman's priority can be to please the Man in her life, as long as that man is her Free Companion.  Her priority will not be that of a slave, which is to obey and please men in general.

Fourth, a Free Woman is absolutely submissive to her Free Companion.  Not in the same way or degree that a slave is, but she is submissive to him, rather like the traditional "Man is the head of the house" model.


_____________________________


Slave Under Construction - Blueprints designed by SixFoot Architecture Ltd.

(in reply to Totalmaster4you)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Free women? - 9/22/2007 7:46:32 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Joined: 8/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sepharus

While the spirit of this post applies to many, I would have to argue that it does not apply to the whole. In My own home we have no slaves. My FC wife is of the thought that one doesnt bring the cows nor the pigs into the home nor should one bring ones slaves.

We have a second residence we affectionately refer to as "The Kennel". My wifes time there often exceeds my own as a good deal of my girls training is in her hands. She has little use for the pleasures of putting my girl to use, however, as a FC She takes great pride in teaching my girl her place and position.



I like the way you think

While I personally have absolutely no attraction to women I have always wanted to help a man train one.  This definitely pushed my happy button


_____________________________


Slave Under Construction - Blueprints designed by SixFoot Architecture Ltd.

(in reply to Sepharus)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Free women? - 9/22/2007 9:59:16 PM   
LJayne


Posts: 35
Joined: 12/6/2005
Status: offline
Tal All
Those quotes are excellent.  I was a FC and Wife to a Gorean Master until recently.  I would have done anything for him, and did - from love and devotion, - he only had to ask - and often didn't have to ask because I 'knew'.  He wanted me as his equal - he said - but deep down he wanted me as slave (he told me this later).  He had at that time, two kajira.  Still has.  But ultimately he chose not to have a FC/wife, and now lives with the slaves, because "you are too much of a challenge, whereas the slaves are just pets, and easy to control".   The whole situation became untenable because I felt as FC that I was Mistress of my house, (under his direction), but the slaves simply did not respond to me.   The dynamics also changed because I sold my property when He went into a business which went belly up, and one of the slaves came into a large sum.   I have since found my place in the heart of Another.  One who appreciates me as His FC.  From this I have learnt much. 

(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Free women? - 9/22/2007 10:30:36 PM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Joined: 8/14/2006
Status: offline
I know exactly what you mean - so many men are just interested in something 'easy to control' - I hope someday I can find one who appreciates that I only serve him because of the man he is - because it's my choice.  Not simply because I need to serve.

_____________________________


Slave Under Construction - Blueprints designed by SixFoot Architecture Ltd.

(in reply to LJayne)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Free women? - 9/23/2007 9:21:49 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4212
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline
Briefly, I'll suggest a good deal of the debate regarding free women and slaves (in Gorean terms) seems to stem from the inherant bias most men have towards slaves over free women.  Whether by device or happenstance, the concept of 'free women' seems most often ascribed to mother (not all mothers mind you, but the one that happened to give birth to the man in question), grandmother, older aunt, older sister, and the older teacher from second grade.  In essence, a woman who's sexuality is taboo, and off limits.  Clearly these are all women, and all women who (at one time or another) likely were/would have been slave material, but at the point with which they came in to said man's life, the emphasis on her sexuality has been replaced by her social standing.  Certainly, nobody likes to imagine their own 70 year old grandmother collared, chained, and raped by three men.

As I believe this is the (general) bias against free women, slaves play a far more prominant role in 'romantic' Gorean lifestyles.  The successful, single forty-five year old male, when faced with the choice between a striking, sexual 23 year old girl and a brusque, rigid, prim forty-four year old woman..... well, you can connect the dots folks.  Slaves represent what the man believes he has earned while free women (most often) reflect what sacrifices the man already made.

Regards,

Stephan

_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Free women? - 9/24/2007 6:51:55 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
So would a submissive tran be a kajira or kajirus? If they were freed would they be a Free Woman or a Free Man?

Orion

_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Sepharus)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Free women? - 9/24/2007 9:27:58 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Tal, Orion.

Kajirum. And Free Human.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Free women? - 9/25/2007 1:07:46 AM   
Stephann


Posts: 4212
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline
Uh....

If a philospher were pissing in the woods and was eaten by lions, would anyone care?  Really?

Ja, no I know.  Philosophers are people too.  Even philophers in the belly of lions   The question is 'what does it matter'.

Stephan

(still, indeed, puzzling.,.. and lost..... in the woods.... but with an empty bladder)



_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Free women? - 9/25/2007 7:01:55 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
It doesn't matter in the least bit, Stephan.

I pick the closest equivalent in my language of choice, unless referring specifically to the general customs.
Philosophy is a poor defense against a lion, except for the part that says "that's my dinner; here, kitty, kitty, blam!"

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Free women? - 9/25/2007 8:16:59 AM   
xoxi


Posts: 1066
Joined: 8/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

Briefly, I'll suggest a good deal of the debate regarding free women and slaves (in Gorean terms) seems to stem from the inherant bias most men have towards slaves over free women.  Whether by device or happenstance, the concept of 'free women' seems most often ascribed to mother (not all mothers mind you, but the one that happened to give birth to the man in question), grandmother, older aunt, older sister, and the older teacher from second grade.  In essence, a woman who's sexuality is taboo, and off limits.  Clearly these are all women, and all women who (at one time or another) likely were/would have been slave material, but at the point with which they came in to said man's life, the emphasis on her sexuality has been replaced by her social standing.  Certainly, nobody likes to imagine their own 70 year old grandmother collared, chained, and raped by three men.

As I believe this is the (general) bias against free women, slaves play a far more prominant role in 'romantic' Gorean lifestyles.  The successful, single forty-five year old male, when faced with the choice between a striking, sexual 23 year old girl and a brusque, rigid, prim forty-four year old woman..... well, you can connect the dots folks.  Slaves represent what the man believes he has earned while free women (most often) reflect what sacrifices the man already made.

Regards,

Stephan

 
Now that is very interesting - to see a Free Woman like that.  I genuinely can not understand why a man would prefer to marry a slave (and thus make her equal to him in the eyes of the law, as they both consent to the marriage and their consent is equally valid) rather than a Free Woman who will be a slave to him and only him.
 
I keep hearing what in my mind are contradictions.  Gorean men take care of their property and don't share it - except in the books.  Swinging is anti-Gorean - except in the books men took whatever slave girl caught their fancy.  Slaves don't have a desire and craving to be fucked by any true Free Man - except someone else says according to the books they do.
 
I guess when I think of a slave as described in the passages of the books I've read, they come across as both totally owned and totally sexualized.  Not just to one man - that's what it appears a Free Companion is.  A woman who is a slave to one man and a dedicated wife and mother in the eyes of the outside world.
 
Yes of course men like sluts...but honestly wouldn't it be doing a true kajira a disservice to say she can't sleep with any Free Man who fancies her?  If she is so utterly sexualized to be pleasing to any man wouldn't it be putting her through an unneccessary hardship to go against her sexualized nature and have to be chaste and modest to other men?  After all you don't choose a slut for her modesty but rather for her sexual prowess.
 
I guess I'm just confused by what I see are contradictions.  Why would a man prefer the mother of his children to be a slave to all men as the kajirae are described?  I would think it would be preferable that she be a 'lady in the street but a freak in the bed' - but obviously I'm not a man, and obviously the kajirae that the men here do marry aren't going out to swingers clubs dressed in silks and being displayed for their pleasing attributes to *all* men, either.  Slaves in the books drank slave wine..they were supposed to fuck, not breed.  Why not get a slave's tubes tied?  

< Message edited by xoxi -- 9/25/2007 8:19:30 AM >


_____________________________


Slave Under Construction - Blueprints designed by SixFoot Architecture Ltd.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Free women? - 9/25/2007 10:41:41 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xoxi

I keep hearing what in my mind are contradictions.


Mostly, it's contradicting interpretations.
People will read into it what they want to read into it.
Consistency begins with living true to oneself, rather than books, IMO.

As history has shown, the latter inevitably degenerates into selectively reinterpreting "scripture".

quote:


I guess when I think of a slave as described in the passages of the books I've read, they come across as both totally owned and totally sexualized.


My take on it is that being totally owned is viewed as totally disinhibiting them.
They have no honor, no nobility, no sovereignty, and so can have no shame.
Personally, I'd have to agree with Bull: who cares if a slave climaxes?

quote:


Not just to one man - that's what it appears a Free Companion is.


A Free Companion is a Free Woman who is companion to a Free Man.
Being a good Free Woman means holding your sovereignty as dear as he does.
Which does not, IMO, need to be an obstacle to voluntarily submitting deeply to him.

quote:


A woman who is a slave to one man and a dedicated wife and mother in the eyes of the outside world.


Do not artificially seperate the roles from submission or sexuality.

quote:


[...]wouldn't it be doing a true kajira a disservice to say she can't sleep with any Free Man who fancies her?


In an STD-free world, there's no reason not to, as long as (as Ghita's Sir said) "you hose her down when you're done with her." But in this world, most men would not want the risk to themselves, nor the risk of losing property that they've invested time into configuring to their liking. And the disservice to her is quite secondary, if at all a concern (varies from person to person), to the disservice to him of the opposite.

You might want to search for the thread on prostituting kajirae for people's thoughts.

quote:


If she is so utterly sexualized to be pleasing to any man wouldn't it be putting her through an unneccessary hardship to go against her sexualized nature and have to be chaste and modest to other men?


Nobody said she has to be chaste and modest. Just that she has to obey. It's his choice.
That said, if taken to that point, one imagines the frustration might be motivating to some.

quote:


After all you don't choose a slut for her modesty but rather for her sexual prowess.


You choose her for whatever qualities you desire from her.

quote:


Why would a man prefer the mother of his children to be a slave to all men as the kajirae are described?


I would think most men would free the children and raise them with his companion.
Anything else would be ill-suited to imparting the ideals of sovereignty and integrity in rearing.

quote:


I would think it would be preferable that she be a 'lady in the street but a freak in the bed' - but obviously I'm not a man,


I don't know. Sounds like most males I've spoken to.
Assuming you're talking about companions here.

quote:


Slaves in the books drank slave wine..they were supposed to fuck, not breed.


Breeding is an acceptable use for a kajira.
Search for the words "strategies" and "biological" in posts by Leonidas here.

Cliff notes:
Monogamy and promiscuity are two viable strategies of procreation.
For a woman, maternity is not in question: she who births it is the mother.
For a man, his paternity depends on strict control over her mating behaviours.
A man who breeds his kajira will make sure he knows exactly who she spreads for.

quote:


Why not get a slave's tubes tied?  


Because we haven't found a doc willing to do it at her age.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to xoxi)
Profile   Post #: 34
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Free women? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

2.703