Aswad
Posts: 6618
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
Tal Bull, quote:
As for customs, they are one of the results of asserting philosphies into action, so they coincide and your choice to alter their content or remove their existance is anti-pragmatic. Quick point on this, then, as it tickles... The customs in the books are a simulation in one man's head of one of the results of handing the philosophies to a population that has been synthetically constructed by the process of throwing together different groups of people from different times and places and hanging the Flame Death over their heads. Hardly representative of any natural process. True, given the circumstances in the books, it's a reasonable approximation to the result. But in the end, our starting point is different from theirs, so we must put the philosophies into action ourselves, together, and allow a culture- with its attendant customs- to grow from that. Some of those customs and that culture, we can figure out by thinking, and a good deal of that has already been done for us in the Gor books, the Hávamál, and the first-hand accounts of Bushido, all of which need adaptation. The rest must emerge on its own. It starts with a realization, an unbuilding and a rebuilding, and concludes with an emergence. This is existential pragmatism, if you will. For your consideration: if the philosophy precludes importing the culture, one cannot follow both, which makes your criterion for being Gorean impossible to fulfill, as either term then cancels the other term. Which leaves the question: does the philosophy preclude importing the culture? That's where I think our opinions diverge. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|