OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Tal Aswad, While this may be technically correct, because we have the knowledge outside the Gor series. If someone where to read only the Gor series, and be Gorean, then it would be their spring. It can also be our spring, with this knowledge that these are timeless ideals, and use the common denominator as the Gor Series. Do you see what I am saying? Live well, Orion quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad Tal Orion, I would have to disagree. My angle is more like that of Simon, i.e. that- through the books- Norman put a word to something timeless. A word that serves as a point on the map, marking the center of a territory, the capital if you will. In this regard, any point will do, and the books are as good as any; also, it pays some homage to the one who depicted and named this place. Our interpretations, however, are used to outline the boundaries of the mental territory- centered on that point- that can be considered Gorean. As has Trevelyan, I offered a suggestion regarding where those boundaries may lie, based on my own observations and interpretations, drawing the boundaries along the natural features of the terrain, where others have tried to draw it with rulers on the map in the past, much as was done with the US states. These boundaries seem fairly compatible. The size of the gap that this bridges is, IMO, an indicator that it's very close to describing the heart of the matter. But regardless of where the boundaries are drawn on the map, the terrain is unchanged, as are the places each of us have decided to stand in that terrain. I do not seek to establish my place, as I already have one, but rather seek to ascertain the approximate boundaries of a territory that interests me. As I see it, in the terrain of concepts, Gor is the capital "city" of the Gorean territory. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.
|