amelliagrace
Posts: 1792
Joined: 8/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote:
ORIGINAL: amelliagrace ]One Man I know has said, "If Women ever grow up enough to work together on a large scale despite their differences of opinion, Male dominion is over." Hmmm...maybe we should call it the "Free Woman's Cartel and Coup Association". Regards- Grace Just remember--at the end of the opera, Brunhilde throws the Ring of the Nibelung back into the Rhine, destroying herself and her kind. Tim Indeed, Tim. We humans are such a bizarre bunch of creatures. All joking aside, I do believe women willing to work together rather than compete so much would precipitate a quantum leap for humanity. Perhaps if women were "in charge" they would avoid some of the pitfalls that men have not. It is equally probable that they would succomb to a few different ones, along with a few of the same ones. World domination isn't the slightest bit appealing to me. While the men I respect, and whose company and freindship I treasure foster a comfortable and cooperative spirit within me, many of men I meet cause me to understand why some women adopt Amazon mentality. It can be, and has been, argued that natural order is male dominance and female deference to it. That is far too simplistic, pat, and inadequate, to my mind. In order for "natural order" to be defined in a manner which is applicable to all human beings, in all cultures, at all times, perhaps it would be better to describe it as as "each being true to self, and those inclined to pair finding the mate (or mates) which provide the complementary counterweight to produce balance, peace, and productivity". When people are true to self and balance, when peace, and productivity are achieved, does it really matter whose on top, whose on first, and whose "in charge"? Does it really matter what percentage of the time, in an optimally balanced society or relationship, either men or women would be "on top"? I'd have to say that the balance was the important part, and the details of it distinctly secondary. Regards- Grace
|