amelliagrace
Posts: 1791
Joined: 8/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Karynn Sometimes, content becomes so much a part of what is expected that it is robotically programmed, and the response you get is on auto-pilot. So very true. quote:
Intent tends to be what is felt and demonstrated in action. You've all heard the phrase, "Put your money where your mouth is." Well this applies with any sort of expectational content. It's one thing to say, "Yes, Mistress." or "Yes, M'am." and quite another thing altogether to feel the surrender or respect of a person of submitted status. Absolutely. quote:
If someone says the right words, and yet demonstrates poor attitude, demonstrates brattiness, behaves like an idiot, then the words to me are drowned in a sea of stupidity. Why bother? On the other hand, I've met a few from both the Gorean lifestyle and from the BDSM mainstream lifestyle who were taught that unless in a very formal setting, honorifics were not necessary, yet every action and attitude literally seemed to ooze with a slavelike or submissive heart. This is at the heart of this debate, for me at least. Customs and protocols are completely worthless if attitiude and intent are not as they should be. Attitde and intent frequently speak loudly enough to drown out the verbage, in both positive and negative situations. quote:
I know people. I've been a part of the lifestyle for years. I understand that some are taught one way. Others are taught differently. One constant I've found, however, is that those who are true to either Gorean or BDSM lifestyle, really understanding the dynamics of those who are free and those who are not, exemplify proper behavior and attitude, regardless of the content of words expected. And at the end of the day, I could care less about lips service if the heart doesn't match. I couldn't have said that better - and obviously haven't. Someting I'd like everyone to think about: The "that's BDSM", "that's not Gorean", statements seem to indicate that one key thing is being missed here. No, I'm not bringing this up to be cantankerous. I am quite serious about it being indicative of an issue worthy of commentary. Some things have absolutely nothing to do with BDSM. They are far more cultural in nature, and by "culutural", I'm looking at the larger context, and not at a subculture. The term "Mistress" is not a Gorean word. It was used well before living Goreans stepped onto the world stage. It isn't a BDSM word either, though it is frequently used by, and often vehemently insisted upon, by BDSM folks. It is, quite simply, just a word. A word with synonyms. A word with different nuance, depending upon what part of the world you grew up in. My father, who was as Gorean as any Gorean man around here(in spite of never using the word "Gorean"), called his mother, and any other woman he respected, "Ma'am" or "Lady", and sometimes, "Woman" (well, not his mom on that one, but other women) till the day he died. He had other choice words for women who failed to garner his admiration, lol. Mistress, Ma'am, Lady, Master, Sir, Mister, Chief, Boss....they are all simply words. Words are devoid of useful power without utilization and context. They are are never sufficint, in and of themselves, for communication. Why? Because the attitude, intention, and inflection of the speaker are part of what gives them impetus, feeling, meaning. The filters of the listener are equally critical. It is those filters we've spent a good bit of time discussing here. I've enjoyed reading about they how's and why's of other's preferences. It is almost always beneficial and worth the time to look at something from another's paradigm. Liz- Your most recent post here contained much truth. But I just have to say that I could have gone all day without another reminder that I'm soon to qualify as an old woman. As my youngest would say, "Oh, that is just so WRONG." lol. Regards- Grace
|