Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Panthers allowed here?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Panthers allowed here? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:41:38 PM   
Maahsatti


Posts: 2579
Joined: 8/5/2006
Status: offline
Laughs

_____________________________

Gorean women, whether slave or Free,know, that their simple presence, brings joy to men,and I cannot think but that this pleases them.
Outlaw of Gor, pg 54

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:47:20 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
Back on topic:

Does anyone else have an opinion as to the mindset and personality of the women that Norman mapped or based his Panthers on?

We already have the proposal that he is identifying women who have been beaten or abused, or who have fled from slavery. By what other paths could a woman come to "panther-hood"?

Also, I'm interested in other's perspective on the submission of Sheera and the definitiveness of her resulting slavery.

SixFoot.

< Message edited by SixFootMaster -- 2/28/2008 7:48:00 PM >


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to Maahsatti)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:48:34 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
They were seen as outlaws, and prey to any man who could take them down.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:52:22 PM   
aeleberaNB


Posts: 690
Joined: 6/4/2007
From: Alberta, Calgary, Canada
Status: offline
Greetings Masters and Mistresses:
Greetings Master SixFoot:

You asked the question:
quote:

By what other paths could a woman come to "panther-hood"?
..

they may have been abandoned at some point in life which may or may not fall under the abuse category... *imv*

well wishes,
aeleberaNB

_____________________________

He is the Master, i am His slave, His property, His muse to do with as He pleases, when and where He pleases. Trust in thy Master as HE knows what is best for His property.

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:52:50 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Greetings SFM,

I believe it was a swipe at the feminist of the time.

Live well,
Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Back on topic:

Does anyone else have an opinion as to the mindset and personality of the women that Norman mapped or based his Panthers on?

We already have the proposal that he is identifying women who have been beaten or abused, or who have fled from slavery. By what other paths could a woman come to "panther-hood"?

Also, I'm interested in other's perspective on the submission of Sheera and the definitiveness of her resulting slavery.

SixFoot.


_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:53:12 PM   
Maahsatti


Posts: 2579
Joined: 8/5/2006
Status: offline
Greetings SF,

  Personally, I have always likened them towards earths Amazon women.

Maahsatti


_____________________________

Gorean women, whether slave or Free,know, that their simple presence, brings joy to men,and I cannot think but that this pleases them.
Outlaw of Gor, pg 54

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 7:59:02 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aeleberaNB

Greetings Masters and Mistresses:
Greetings Master SixFoot:

You asked the question:
quote:

By what other paths could a woman come to "panther-hood"?
..

they may have been abandoned at some point in life which may or may not fall under the abuse category... *imv*

well wishes,
aeleberaNB


Very true, aelebera, although usually the abandoned and homeless were called she-urts, and were generally left alone to forage for scraps and such as long as they did not become too much of a nuisance. It does make sense that the more spirited of these might have ventured to the forests and wilds though. Sleen and thalarian are not easy targets for someone who has never held a weapon before.

Six.


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to aeleberaNB)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 8:03:23 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
Tal Orion,

Indisputably. I suppose the question then is "where did the feminists come from" - bit outside my time-line.

Live well,

Six.


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 8:03:39 PM   
aeleberaNB


Posts: 690
Joined: 6/4/2007
From: Alberta, Calgary, Canada
Status: offline
Greetings Master SixFoot:

Thank You for clarifying this for me.. i have yet to read the book(s) that speak of the "panther girls," and am grateful for the information You have given.

well wishes,
aeleberaNB

_____________________________

He is the Master, i am His slave, His property, His muse to do with as He pleases, when and where He pleases. Trust in thy Master as HE knows what is best for His property.

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 8:11:01 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Greetings SFM,

The largest push was WWII, when males had to go to war. Many jobs that were typically male, were now available to women. Combine this with many factories beening retooled for less skilled workers, allowed minimal training for the females to take over. Once the war was over, many females remained working and taking care of the family, and the males at the time allowed this, because it increased the family wealth. It showed some women there was no need for a male, and the males at the time did not step up and display their leadership adequately so as to show that their commodity was not just a monetary one.

The feminist kovement has splintered into four major groups, and one of them refuses to acknowledge they are feminist as they feel this is counter to what they are pushing, which is non-gender.

Live well,
Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Tal Orion,

Indisputably. I suppose the question then is "where did the feminists come from" - bit outside my time-line.

Live well,

Six.



_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 9:23:58 PM   
MasterEros


Posts: 213
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterEros

I would appreciate no further comments on how I speak... According to my Indian way every voice is heard regardless and no one would ever tell you how to speak, never. My Indian way of honoring how everyone speaks is my accepted way as is it among my people, where I live day to day.

 
 
A Gorean Free Man would not walk among the Apache informing them that he "would appreciate" it if they would follow his customs, instead of their own, in the presence of his royal Gorean ass.

K.
 


K
 
I would consider your comment to be unrelated for this thread which I am uninterested in engaging with anyone who cares to go off topic.
 
Honor to you. My word remains. Standing Strong! AH'O
 
In Abiding Strength and Apache Honor, forged as Steel...
Master D.B.E

_____________________________

~ some-things are better left unsaid while some-things must be spoken ~


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 9:42:22 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 7246
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

I believe it was a swipe at the feminist of the time.


Tal Orion,
 
If not, it nevertheless serves nicely. A peculiarity of our culture, which I think Norman saw, is the way things can be packaged as something totally unrelated, even their opposite, through the simple expedient of calling them by a different name. Someone unfamiliar with the word "feminism" might legitimately expect it to have something to do with femininity. "Gay" is an example of pure packaging. And you may recall that we used to understand the word "speech" as having to do with words, not acts.
 
IWYW,
 
Kirata
 

< Message edited by Kirata -- 2/28/2008 9:45:52 PM >

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 9:48:46 PM   
SixFootMaster


Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
Tal Kirata,

A good point you make - in fact, when I first heard of feminism, I assumed that it had something to do with prompting femininity. The flip-side of this is, many of the women I know personally believe in feminism as an approach to forward the female qualities, rather than anything to do with supremacy or control.

SixFoot.


_____________________________

How-so oft fresh injurious deed
Doth turn Janus' petulant gaze
'pon the rocks and storm rift sea
And littered wood of broken days
disregard for toil shown
no ground broken, no seed sewn.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/28/2008 11:47:21 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster

Perchance, but I can honestly say I've never met a woman who did not display submissive tendencies or traits around particular men. Perhaps my experience is not representative of the female population at large, but given the variety of life I've been through, it doesn't seem likely.


Which parts of that are inherent, and which are a cultural legacy, remains one of the key questions.

That said, I suspect there's a great deal of variation there, on both the male and female sides of the equation.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 6:38:51 AM   
Jahnaca


Posts: 726
Joined: 8/28/2006
Status: offline
Greetings

I would say that the feminist movement did not “start” after WW2, in point of fact I believe it ran in tandem with movements that started in the 18th and 19th century.

The American Constitution declared that “all men are created equal” unfortunately society didn’t recognize all men in that statement.  All men in America were not equal.  Depending on which period of time one were to look at men were discriminated based race, colour, religious affiliation, social and economic standing.  For example at one point in history you had to be a white American, own land and be of X religion before you could vote.  Movements were started to enforce the Constitutional statement “all men.”  As the 19th century progressed more and more men were granted the right to vote (among other things).  Running along side of this was a movement specifically for women.  The most recognized movement to us would be the Black movement which gained a lot of ground in equal rights during the middle part of the 20th century.

When one starts talking about equal rights you open a large can of worms.  As one concept is addressed, several other concepts come into play.  This complicates the growth of a movement because it is difficult for it to remain static.  It evolves.

The fantasy of the 1950's housewife staying home was just that to most working class families before WW2.  A large number of women (and chil*dren) worked in the sweat shops made popular during the Industrial revolution.  In fact they were often the greatest number of employees for a factory as they were a cheap and easily exploited labour pool.  Pre WW2 the middle class was  small, unlike today.  This meant more families were either lower or upper, the lower out numbering the upper by a large degree.  Further women in rural settings worked very long and hard on the land, women owned/operated many forms of cottage industry etc.  The notion women didn’t work is grossly wrong and misguided.  They did.

In the late 19th century and into the early part of the 20th, the middle class was beginning to gain ground.  To show their new found wealth it became vogue to have the little lady stay home and manage the household.  Generally meaning servants (mostly females).  It was a general sign of prosperity and the birth of the stay at home mom.  As this was promoted as a the next great achievement of mankind we tend to forget what was actually going on in industry.  Unions, and other such movements to improve working conditions for the employees were gaining ground.  There was a huge pay disparity between males and females, males of colour or ethic back ground etc, all being addressed in one movement or another.  For each win a new cause was created.

War broke out, men suddenly became solders and women took up the places that men formerly patted women on the head and said, “not for you honey, you can’t.”  Not only could they, they did it well.  After the war, when men came home the “not for you honey, you can’t” didn’t seem to make much sense, though society seemed to start saying it again.  See an even greater number of middle class society was still chasing that ideal of prosperity, have the little woman stay home.  A great number for one reason or another didn’t go back to kitchen but stayed in the work force (the lower class still needed the income.)  Unions again were gaining ground in working conditions, pay, benefits etc yet discrimination based on race/gender was still rampant and being more forcefully addressed.  As society changed post WW2, so did the movements which had been around for a very long time.  They became more forceful, radical, out spoken etc.

You see the feminist movement didn’t evolve in a vacuum on it’s own.  It like many other movements grew along each other.  Feeding off of social changes, wins and losses in other battles and a host of other things we simply don’t take into account.  Since the industrial revolution society has gone through many sweeping changes.  This does make a huge impact on cultures and it’s beliefs.  It also takes time for a culture to balance it’s self out.  The 60's and 70's were chaotic decades of such great moral and social change we can not expect anything less then radicals leaping out of ever crack.  30 years later, we tend to look at that period with a very narrow view, not recognizing what lead up to that point in history.  It’s a shame really, there is so much to learn about self created barriers found within society and the mockery it can be when viewed under the light of truth.

Jahna

_____________________________

Mass-produced human beings are attractive only to those who expect to be their benevolent mass producers. John Norman

(in reply to SixFootMaster)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 6:51:57 AM   
Karynn


Posts: 773
Joined: 6/8/2007
Status: offline
Tal Jahna,

I love history. I took several classes that were part of the "Women in History" new major the college had defined. I had considered writing a good bit of what you just wrote, but didn't have the coherance needed to make it make sense. Kudos! I loved it.

K

_____________________________

In all things, to thine own self be true.

(in reply to Jahnaca)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 3:12:30 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jahnaca

Greetings

I would say that the feminist movement did not “start” after WW2, in point of fact I believe it ran in tandem with movements that started in the 18th and 19th century.


Did someone say it started after WWII? I said "The largest push was WWII". Do a search on Rosie the Riveter and you will see some information on the second wave of feminism. The start of it was in the 18th and 19th centuries, but there was a lot more impact during the 20th century, with women gain voting rights in many countries during that period.

quote:


The American Constitution declared that “all men are created equal” unfortunately society didn’t recognize all men in that statement.  All men in America were not equal.  Depending on which period of time one were to look at men were discriminated based race, colour, religious affiliation, social and economic standing.  For example at one point in history you had to be a white American, own land and be of X religion before you could vote.  Movements were started to enforce the Constitutional statement “all men.”  As the 19th century progressed more and more men were granted the right to vote (among other things).  Running along side of this was a movement specifically for women.  The most recognized movement to us would be the Black movement which gained a lot of ground in equal rights during the middle part of the 20th century.


Some argue that the "equal" in the constitution means an equatable opportunity.

quote:


When one starts talking about equal rights you open a large can of worms.  As one concept is addressed, several other concepts come into play.  This complicates the growth of a movement because it is difficult for it to remain static.  It evolves.


Yep, the only contstant is change.

quote:


The fantasy of the 1950's housewife staying home was just that to most working class families before WW2.  A large number of women (and chil*dren) worked in the sweat shops made popular during the Industrial revolution.  In fact they were often the greatest number of employees for a factory as they were a cheap and easily exploited labour pool.  Pre WW2 the middle class was  small, unlike today.  This meant more families were either lower or upper, the lower out numbering the upper by a large degree.  Further women in rural settings worked very long and hard on the land, women owned/operated many forms of cottage industry etc.  The notion women didn’t work is grossly wrong and misguided.  They did.


There were certain jobs that they did not work until WWII, or that it was very uncommon for them to work. Some of these were bank tellers, shoe sales, and wait staff in a restaurant, to name a few. Women and children have always been used for mundane labor throughout history, until the change started recently. They still do work in sweatshops in some countries.

quote:


In the late 19th century and into the early part of the 20th, the middle class was beginning to gain ground.  To show their new found wealth it became vogue to have the little lady stay home and manage the household.  Generally meaning servants (mostly females).  It was a general sign of prosperity and the birth of the stay at home mom.  As this was promoted as a the next great achievement of mankind we tend to forget what was actually going on in industry.  Unions, and other such movements to improve working conditions for the employees were gaining ground.  There was a huge pay disparity between males and females, males of colour or ethic back ground etc, all being addressed in one movement or another.  For each win a new cause was created.


Not just pay disparity, but there is also a disparity in hours worked at a job, that continues until today.

quote:


War broke out, men suddenly became solders and women took up the places that men formerly patted women on the head and said, “not for you honey, you can’t.”  Not only could they, they did it well.  After the war, when men came home the “not for you honey, you can’t” didn’t seem to make much sense, though society seemed to start saying it again.  See an even greater number of middle class society was still chasing that ideal of prosperity, have the little woman stay home.  A great number for one reason or another didn’t go back to kitchen but stayed in the work force (the lower class still needed the income.)  Unions again were gaining ground in working conditions, pay, benefits etc yet discrimination based on race/gender was still rampant and being more forcefully addressed.  As society changed post WW2, so did the movements which had been around for a very long time.  They became more forceful, radical, out spoken etc.


You have left out some of the sociological studies that suggest that males also started a period of less dominant behavior to attract mates. This combined with exploitation of females to work outside the home and still requires to maintain the home, helped fuel the resentment many females began to have.

quote:


You see the feminist movement didn’t evolve in a vacuum on it’s own.  It like many other movements grew along each other.  Feeding off of social changes, wins and losses in other battles and a host of other things we simply don’t take into account.  Since the industrial revolution society has gone through many sweeping changes.  This does make a huge impact on cultures and it’s beliefs.  It also takes time for a culture to balance it’s self out.  The 60's and 70's were chaotic decades of such great moral and social change we can not expect anything less then radicals leaping out of ever crack.  30 years later, we tend to look at that period with a very narrow view, not recognizing what lead up to that point in history.  It’s a shame really, there is so much to learn about self created barriers found within society and the mockery it can be when viewed under the light of truth.

Jahna


I believe it is explained in waves if you read much of the literature on it. What I also find interesting is the it also progresses on a bar chart, very similar to how technology and the industrial revolution have progressed. Could females have gone as far as they have if not for tools, machines, computers and such to assist them in doing some of the same physical tasks that used to require just a male?

Live well,
Orion

_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Jahnaca)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 9:37:03 PM   
Najakcharmer


Posts: 2121
Joined: 5/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Could females have gone as far as they have if not for tools, machines, computers and such to assist them in doing some of the same physical tasks that used to require just a male?


No, but neither could males.  Most tasks in modern construction and computing now require specialized tools, since human strength and mind alone are much less efficient than cranes and computers. 

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 9:41:37 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 37420
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The technology that 'lifted' women out of the hole was the pill. End of joke.

Ron

_____________________________

Kam Fong as Chin Ho

For in the final analysis, our most basic common link, is that we all inhabit this small planet, we all breathe the same air, we all cherish our children's futures, and we are all mortal. JFK



(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Panthers allowed here? - 2/29/2008 9:53:23 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Greetings Naja,

Yes, but did you miss or just ignore the point of the question?

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: Najakcharmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Could females have gone as far as they have if not for tools, machines, computers and such to assist them in doing some of the same physical tasks that used to require just a male?


No, but neither could males.  Most tasks in modern construction and computing now require specialized tools, since human strength and mind alone are much less efficient than cranes and computers. 



_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Najakcharmer)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Panthers allowed here? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188