LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
I posted a few threads on this a while back. From memory, the Bill precludes only certain images and in certain situations - its not a blanket ban, although as the OP says it could be open to misinterpretation. Whats banned is (and my memory may have failed me) any image where death or serious injury is depicted or may result from the activity depicted, and it only applies to images concerned with the neck, the anus or the breasts. As for "serious injury" I seem to recall on one of the threads bringing up the description of serious injury from the website of the Crown Prosecution Service, which only uses the term serious injury in relation to assaults which constitute Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH ie broken bones, penetration wounds etc) - which makes it rather difficult under this new law to prosecute for images depicting what most of us would consider to be Safe and Sane; "serious injury" must be "serious injury" and it would be a hopeful prosecutor indeed who would forward a case for it where the injury or potential injury does not fit the description required for a charge of GBH. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|