SimonofTabor
Posts: 123
Joined: 9/7/2006 From: UK Status: offline
|
What LordShadow describes sounds to me rather like wanton sadism, and that isn't Gorean. Yes, the girl is property and the owner can do with his property as he pleases (leaving aside legal considerations that apply here on Earth for a moment), but that isn't the point. The point is that if we're seeking to emulate the mindset and ethos of a Gorean from the books, wanton sadism is not part of that. A relevant quote: "Perhaps it should only be added that the Gorean master, though often strict, is seldom cruel. The girl knows, if she pleases him, her lot will be an easy one. She will almost never encounter sadism or wanton cruelty, for the psychological environment that tends to breed these diseases is largely absent from Gor. This does not mean that she will not expect to be beaten if she disobeys, or fails to please her master." (Outlaw of Gor p53-54, original edition) Of course, that's taken from one of the earliest books, but in case anyone is thinking John may have altered that position over the years since he wrote Outlaw, let me quote from a letter written by John Norman less than a year ago, in April 2007: "Sadism on Gor is either nonexistent, or very rare. That is because there are, on the whole, few border crossings between the countries of Yin and Yang, so to speak. Complementarities tend to be respected. Where nature is revered, understood, and attended to, where differences are recognized and welcomed, even celebrated, humans, statistically, are happy, contented, and fulfilled. Accordingly, in such a world, there is little motivation for intersexual cruelty, envy, resentment, hatred, jealousy, and such. As Gor is a natural world, balances are maintained. On Gor, humans flourish." (Full letter available at http://gorchronicles.com/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=35) So, although a Gorean could (again leaving aside legal considerations for a moment) inflict wanton cruelty on his slave, my question would be, "Why would he, if he is seeking to emulate the mindset of a Gorean from the books?" Should he not, instead, be looking to achieve a situation where there is no longer any motivation for that kind of behaviour? The label "Gorean" is not a licence for a man to be an asshole, but a responsibility to be a decent, honourable, human being, to respect nature and live in accordance with that. The Gorean seeks to build a world in which humans can flourish; in which nature is revered, and attended to; in which there is no motivation for intersexual cruelty, envy, resentment, hatred, jealousy, and such; in which men can be men, and women can be women; in which everyone is happy, contented, and fulfilled. In another letter last year John Norman said, referring to the western world that most of us live in, "If an ideology produces unhappiness, misery, grief, division, sickness, boredom, and hatred, surely this is not a commendation but an indictment." (full letter available at http://gorchronicles.com/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=33). Although that was in the context of comments about modern western ideology, would it not also apply to the Gorean ideology, if those were its effects? Personally I would prefer to be in a world where "Gorean" was a commendation, not an indictment. Simon PS: This was written using Fast Reply, and my comments were prompted by the topic as a whole, especially the opening post, and are not a direct response to comments by Orion, despite what it says below.
< Message edited by SimonofTabor -- 3/7/2008 8:43:19 PM >
|