|
Leonidas -> RE: A sincere question (9/26/2005 4:14:01 AM)
|
quote:
My Owner does not believe it is a woman's place to be at a Man's feet, although he does believe it is mine to be at his feet. Yes. That is a real difference. Your master doesn't view your desire to submit to him to be an aspect of your femininity. He thinks that it is a trait that you just happen to have as an individual. Goreans do think that the desire to submit to a man is a feminine trait resulting from how we evolved as a species. It is a misconception, though, that Goreans think that all women belong at the feet of all men. Some women truly do value freedom over whatever desire they have to be under the protection and control of a man. They should be free. On the other hand, I see men every day that, as a Gorean, I think would be better off in a collar and under the whip of a master. They don't think so, and so it's not likely to happen anytime soon. Gorean ethics regarding freedom (and its counterpart slavery) are different, and probably a lot "harder" than you think. quote:
Also I do not call all men Master just the one who owns me. That is also a real difference. Goreans view slavery as a social status in addition to a kind of personal relation. It is because of the high value we place on freedom, and the will to be free as a character trait. Because we place a lot of value on that character trait, we don't consider those who do not have a strong will to be free to be the peers of those who do. Our slaves acknowledge that they are not the peers of the free by addressing free men as "Master". Your master, I would surmise from what you are saying, does consider you to be the equal and peer of everyone except him. That is a real difference between him and a Gorean. quote:
Perhaps it is also that it pleases him to let my dominant side out with others. It really depends. The society around us is "classless". Gorean culture isn't. It's never acceptable in Gorean culture for a slave to "express their dominant side" toward the free. She isn't in their class, and so we would consider it to be disrespectful. That isn't to say that there isn't a dominance hierarchy among slaves, though. When I have owned multiple slaves, one of them was typically "first girl" and could be said to have expressed her "dominant side" when directing the other slaves in the chores of the household. I apprecate your question, and the way that you've conducted yourself here. It's an example of the kind of question I don't mind answering from a non-Gorean. We aren't challenging the validity of each other's ways. Just comparing notes to gain additional understanding. I think that's a fine use of bandwith on a forum like this.
|
|
|
|