Lordandmaster
Posts: 10836
Joined: 6/22/2004 Status: offline
|
JustaTop, I think I know what you mean, and there must be something to it. But it's more complicated than that. I wasn't a very political person until the Bush regime, and I still wouldn't call myself a leftist. Right now, I'm more of an anti-rightist. I disagree with a lot of standard left-wing positions, and I'm definitely not a hippie. Also, there are lots of different kinds of Goreans. (You might not get that impression from this forum, but it's true.) Although we've seen several posts longing for the good old days when men did their jobs and women knew their place (and predictably, these have caused a lot of disagreement), you don't have to take any particular political view in order to be Gorean. So I think there are many reasons for the antagonism, and politics is only one of them. Some BDSMers like to bash Goreans for patterning their lives after a body of fiction, but I don't find that kind of attack very appealing. Many people, consciously or not, pattern themselves after something they've read. If the Gor books offer some people a meaningful ideal, what's wrong with using them as a guide? So I think there is some hypocrisy coming from the BDSM crowd. After all, they read the Story of O and the Marketplace series and God knows what else. Another standard BDSM criticism you hear is that Gor is all about absurd chatroom-inspired protocols. The perfect example for me is when Lamspeach was kicked out of a Gorean chatroom because she wasn't using the right font. If that were really all that Gor is about, I'd agree with that criticism too, but it's clear that there are Goreans who are not just online creatures. (In fact, I'm pretty sure the Goreans in this forum would be quick to dismiss the online-only Goreans as "fakes.") The most common criticism of BDSM that I've heard from Goreans is that it's all superficial play, and that the sub is always in control. To tell you the truth, I sympathize with a lot of that sentiment. The munch-and-play-party culture really leaves me cold. I don't go out of my way to bash people who enjoy that, but it's definitely not for me. Where I think these Goreans err is in assuming that this is all BDSM has to offer. In fact, BDSM is one of the most diverse movements you'll see, with all kinds of different people in it. (It's one of the reasons why I'm convinced it's simply inborn: you find people of all races, all socioeconomic backgrounds, and all religions.) Many people who identify with the BDSM life rather than the Gorean life are looking for the same kind of absolute dominant and submissive relationship that Goreans treasure. The only difference is that they don't assume the male has to be the dom and the female has to be the sub--and, of course, they don't use the Gor books as a model. The last thing I'd like to say about this, although I've said it before, is that I really hadn't seen much antagonism between the BDSM and Gorean populations until this forum. And I've been in the life since I was 20. So maybe the antagonism has as much to do with individual personalities as anything else.
< Message edited by Lordandmaster -- 10/9/2005 5:17:30 AM >
|