Stephann
Posts: 4212
Joined: 12/27/2006 From: Los Angeles, CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xoxi Just a question for anyone who wants to answer it, although I'm primarily looking for the perspectives of the Masters here. Do you feel that a Master should feel obligated to act within his slave's best interests when giving her orders, if her best interests contradict his own? Just to give an example, if the girl was living at university when she was collared, and the Master ordered her to drop out of school, move in with him, and get a job. One would say that her own best interests would be finishing school, yet from the Master's perspective her obligations at school detract from her being a productive member of his household. I am not asking whether the Master has the *right* to order his slave to do that, I would imagine everyone would agree that he does have the right to do so...I guess I'm asking whether you would consider it to be an ethical thing to do. And more importantly, why? It stands to reason, if she has begged to be his slave (and not merely his submissive girlfriend) than his ethics become based on what he feels is best for his house. A man can own a dog, and choose to purchase the cheapest food possible, give it a tiny space to live in, and otherwise care for the animal in less-than-optimal yet still (technically) conditions. I would consider that to be unethical, since the dog couldn't choose to wear her master's collar. It can not be for the slave to dictate what is ethical, or not. I might look at how another man cares for his slave, or dog, and comment, disagree, cajole, insult, etc, but at the end of the day, unless I am capable of taking possession of his property from him, that property will remain his. It isn't for his property to cajole, insult, threaten, or make demands on her owner. Certainly, her perspective and expectations will carry some value in the end, but the moment she attempts to manipulate him, she should well expect a strong, harsh reminder in who's ethics rule the house. This isn't to say she shouldn't make the effort to protect herself; if she is capable of manipulating her man, she should. I'm only illustrating that if she can manipulate him (instead of leaving him to make the best decisions) than authority transfer isn't taking place. I'm afraid I'm woefully inarticulate this morning; I'll come back to this another time I think. Stephan
_____________________________
Nosce Te Ipsum "The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer Men: Find a Woman here
|