amelliagrace
Posts: 1792
Joined: 8/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf Greetings Grace, If slavery were legal, would you theorize more males or more females would own property? To identify a mean standard, would you say slave ownership requires more male influence or more female influence? I believe more maturity in general is needed for wonership, but regardless of which gender the maturity lies in, which one would you say in general has the traits best suited to lead, be head of the household, and defend the homestead? This is a fundamental difference I see, in some of your comments and how I and others see things. Many state things in general, and have no need to put a disclaimer to include everything else. Good evening, Orion - IMO, there would be a higher percentage of men than women who were both possessed of the necessary qualities to be a good owner, and the desire to be an owner in the first place. There is likely to be a greater disparity between the number of men and women who would desire to own, than there would be between those of the two sexes capable. Both differences are still almost certainly statistically signifigant, though I'd be shocked if there wasn't a great deal of variation in numbers and percentages, across time, and across cultures. Chances are there are more women in both catagories than you'd like to think, and fewer in both than I would. I do not see male charictaristics, without the influence of female charictaristics, as being sufficient, in and of them selves, to be conducive to productive, healthy, optimal slave keeping. A strictly "Amazon" approach isn't likely to be any better. Both sets of traits are necessary for balance and harmony in life. In some areas, the traits we consider "masculine" are the more obviously necessisary, with the opposite is true in others. In most of the day to day of life, the abscense of either leads to dysfunction. Just my opinion, of course, based on reading, living, and observing. I'm sure some disagree, and I'm equally certain I'm not the only one to posess these particular views. Not that either the agreement or disagreement of others make me any more, or less, correct. Certainly, these are general statements. They do not discount either the predominant or the exception. Regards- Grace
|