Aswad
Posts: 6908
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
G'day. Thanks. It always struck me that it is hard for me to interpret things as anything other than (a) endorsement of slavery in a classic sense, or (b) rejection of slavery in any sense, used only as a metaphor for love and a parody on the radical feminist assertion at the time that men and women could only relate as master and slave. Of course, Norman may not have intended that, but those are the two readings I find compatible with the corpus. Now, clearly, our practices in this regard are not as callous as those in classic times, but that is as much a matter of our personalities and the legacy of rearing in a society that is hostile to the idea, as it is a matter of the legalities involved. Clearly, so long as the law permits a girl to press charges, most of the girls picked for this are going to be picked in a manner that is more compatible with their nature than would have been the case in classic times. And, by extension, be treated in a manner that is similarly different. If the community were not so opposed to change, I would rather propose calling such girls our "pets." I have three readily available references for those who'd like an idea of the difference. All are contemporary and more easily digested than the Gor books. The television series Rome illustrates very well (IMO) what a slave factually is: property. Yes, a bond can arise between a kind owner and a slave (e.g. the scene where one slave offers herself to the gods as a sacrifice to fuel a curse to avenge her owner). But they are bought and sold (e.g. the scene where Attia and her daughter are discussing whether a particular slave would make a suitable gift) and treated according to whim (e.g. the scene where a slave is being whipped within an inch of his life because the owner is angry). The book series Wheel of Time illustrates one kind of human pet, in the form of damane and sul'dam, while the Sword of Truth series illustrates (albeit less realistically) another kind of human pet, i.e. those who are claimed by the Mord'Sith shock troops of D'Hara. One might argue that the da'covale and da'tsang in WoT are examples of the same thing, although I would say that da'tsang are closer to kajirae (hell, the words mean roughly the same thing- despised one- but those in WoT are treated more like one imagines the origins of kajirae would have been on Gor). Again, though, most are opposed to drawing inspiration from outside sources. In a living culture, it would be more appropriate to say that we own human pets, yet are not opposed to owning slaves either, should the law allow for such a thing. But this is not presently the case, so any Gorean owning slaves is either engaged in civil disobedience (equates to being an outlaw in such a stagnant society as the one in the books), or is a simple outlaw (again, no difference in the books until the outcome is settled). Obviously, most of this post is not so much for your benefit (more like verbose agreement in that regard) as for the galleries. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|