Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

Knowing John Norman


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> Knowing John Norman Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 6:15:25 AM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
Just out of curiosity, how many people research the life of John Norman? Has anyone here met him or bother to learn about his personel life style? Has anyone ever seen him at a BDSM event? After all, Gor has made a big influence on the BDSM community. I wonder if his personel exerperiences and life also had anything to do with Domination and Submission/Slavery?

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 6:34:46 AM   
lisaSea


Posts: 340
Joined: 8/27/2005
Status: offline
Greetings Masters, Mistresses and slaves...

I tried once, about 6 years ago, to contact JN via email. I was sent a very polite letter from his publicist, telling me that JN prefers to distance himself from his "fandom".

While I have never heard of his attendence at a BDSM function, I have heard that he does book signings at Sci-Fi conventions...or has in the past. Not totally sure about the impact on BDSM, (since that isn't my personal thang), but I will add that his writings have had quite an impact on my life and through those books filled with typos and gramatical errors, I have been blessed to meet others with similiar mindsets.

Best of wishes,

lisa{Sea's}




_____________________________

I prefer to think of it as aged to perfection, rather then just plain getting older.

http://www.geocities.com/house_of_sea

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 7:47:50 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 1476
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
Tal It is true John Norman is a private person. He has never been to any Gor gathering, indorsed any gor group and has been quoted at saying "He did not intend for his books to be a lifestyle." He is rarely seen in public nor even goes to many "Book signings" to promote his Gor books. In fact I was informed at one it was rather negative, he refused to sign the person copy of the Gor book. (The wrong question was asked).

I Wish You Well

Nosathro

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 7:53:02 AM   
Webmaster60


Posts: 396
Joined: 9/10/2005
Status: offline
I will try to keep this question on topic.. Did Norman ever produce a pronunciation guide for Gorean words? I've read the books, but when speaking to other Goreans real time we disagree on the spoken word.
I have seen SEVERAL guides "out there" but none that I would consider to have any more validity than another. After all, only HE knows the truth of it.

Secondly, how do Goreans feel about Imaginative Sex? No not the act, the book. Do you find it detracts from Gorean philosophy?

Master Michael

_____________________________

Master Michael
~~~~~~~~~~
"To sin in silence when he should
speak makes cowards of men"

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 8:18:34 AM   
DesertRat


Posts: 2774
Joined: 11/29/2004
From: NM/USA
Status: offline
Yes! I would love a pronunciation guide. Obviously, the words can be sounded out, but I find myself wondering where to put the major accents. Also wondering about long and short vowels, hard and soft consonants....all the usual stuff. In my head, I always try to make the words sound as sleek and sexy as possible but real languages don't work that way. For example: Veni, Vidi, Vici = "wenny, widdy, wiki".

Bob

(in reply to Webmaster60)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/3/2005 6:09:40 PM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
This past summer, because of some issues involved in another group on line where people were making attributions to Mr. Lange (including the statement that he "leads a BDSM life")... I called him and asked for an interview.

He does not do interviews... and, has not for about twelve years...

He has not talked to anyone about his books in that time except family and friends.. and, absolutely refuses to discuss the Gor Series....

Apparently some time ago he gave an interview that was completely slanted and overtly skewed by the author/publication. Because of that, he absolutely refuses any more.

He was exceptionally nice to me (as was his wife - both were very polite, but definitive about their resolution not to speak to others about themselves).. and, reiterated that very politely but firmly in the reply to the follow-up letter.

As far as a "Big Influence on the BDSM community" - I would say that there are those who have been significantly influenced - but, it has not influenced a large percentage relative to those who claim association/adherence in real life..

But, then - as with many things about Gor... there is only personal conjecture to go by.

~J

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 2:15:11 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Just out of curiosity, how many people research the life of John Norman? Has anyone here met him or bother to learn about his personel life style? Has anyone ever seen him at a BDSM event? After all, Gor has made a big influence on the BDSM community. I wonder if his personel exerperiences and life also had anything to do with Domination and Submission/Slavery?


He was born in Chicago.
He got his undergrad degree from the University of Nebraska in 1953
He got his master's degree from USC in 1957
He got his Ph.D. From Princeton in 1963
He taught Queen's College in New York for a while.
He's been married to the same woman since 1956.
He has three grown children.
He wrote the Gor Series, one other three book series, two other novels and one non-fiction work about sex and D/s. He wrote one academic book, and edited a second one.
At one time he frequented Sci-Fi conventions like Magicon and I-Con.

In recent years he's been involved with three attempts to revive the popularity of the Gor series, including a comic-book like magazine, a re-release of the first 10 books in the series by Masquarade, and the publishing of the 26th book in the series by a small online outfit.

He has never to my knowledge been involved with any BDSM organization or taught workshops on D/s. He has said when asked that he is monogamous, and that Bernice (his wife) is not submissive to him. From this, and the biography above, you could draw the conclusion that, like many men of his generation, he's pretty square and mundane compared with most folks in BDSM land. That said, his influence on the BDSM world is probably more pervasive than anyone can estimate. His "Imaginative Sex" is a how-to for kinksters that was written over a decade before any comparable work in the BDSM cannon. The Gor series gave the 60s generation it's first look at D/s sexuality in print and was undoubtedly the impetus for many young men and women to seek out sexual relations that were "out of the ordinary".

That's what I know.


< Message edited by Leonidas -- 11/4/2005 2:18:37 AM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 3:59:03 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
That is pretty excellent -
But, just for the record:
1. He made a career of teaching (mostly at Queens College) and still does as a 'Professor Emeritus'.
2. In 1964 a book called "Flaggelation Curiosa" by HT Buckle was first published
3. In 1965, the first American version of "The Story of O" by Pauline Reage was published.
4. In 1967, "Sexual Sadism - The Pleasure of Inflicting Pain" by Edward Poldosky, MD was first published
- "Erotic Variations" by John Barry was first published
5. 1968 - "The Real Thing" by William Carney is first published
6. 1969 - "Return to the Chateau", by Pauline Reage (the sequel to the 'Story of O') is first published
- "Flagellation and the Flagellants" by Rev. Cooper (American Edition) is first published (this book has a lot of bad information associated with it)
7. 1970 - "The Young Master" by William Lambert III is first published
- Larry Townsend's "Leatherman's Handbook" was first published in 1972 and was in it's second printing in 1974 when 'Imaginative Sex' first went to print.

Larry Townsend's book is the first original "How to" manual for people involved in modern BDSM relationships.... many of the books to follow were based on this books structure and attitude towards one's partners and the means of persuing relational dynamics.

(As a side note - Larry was one of the people who they were speaking about when the term "Old Guard" was coined.)

And, this is only noting a few things that were published in the decade previous to imaginative sex.

As you know, the history of BDSM (and therefore it's publications and books) stretches back for millenia.

~J


< Message edited by LordODiscipline -- 11/4/2005 4:25:42 AM >

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 6:15:19 AM   
edana


Posts: 594
Joined: 10/13/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, this is actually Leonidas again

quote:

1. He made a career of teaching (mostly at Queens College) and still does as a 'Professor Emeritus'.


Yes, he still gets e-mail there. I was trying not to be over specific, but you are right. As you rightly pointed out in your initial post, he likes his privacy.

quote:

And, this is only noting a few things that were published in the decade previous to imaginative sex.


And read by... whom? Yes, I know that all of those books are listed in a typical history of the gay leather scene along with various pioneering gay magazines of the day that had the visionary boldness to show naked dicks, but when I said "The BDSM Canon" I was talking about "how to" books that someone might have actually read. Do you have any or all of those books on your shelf? Know many folks who do? The Leatherman's Guide makes the list, but not the original 1972 version. Outside the underground (at the time) world of gay leather nobody really read that book in the 70s. If Larry was able to sell 1 copy of it in the 70s for every 100 copies of Imaginative Sex sold, he was doing really really well. That's not a knock on Larry, it's just that he was writing for a very narrow audience. His influence among that audience is undeniable, his influence outside it is questionable (at least in the 70s).

The Story of O is certainly well known, popular, very influential, and yes, contemporary with the Gor books in this country. I don't know how the original '65 translation sold. The early European editions sold in the hundreds, and later thousands per printing under a couple of different titles. If anyone here does how the original version in North America sold I'd be interested in knowing. I think that it didn't become that widely known until the (cheezy) movie came out a decade later.

None of this should be construed to deny that the gay leather scene was doing SM in an organized way before anyone else in North America. On that front, they were certainly pioneers. How influencial they were, or cointinue to be, I don't know, and I don't think it can be known. As I said in my post, I don't know, and I don't think it can be known, how infuential the Gor books or Imaginative Sex were. Unlike the books that you mentioned they did sell millions, rather than hundreds or thousands, of copies. In the end it doesn't matter. It's not a contest.


< Message edited by edana -- 11/4/2005 6:46:35 AM >


_____________________________

In service,

edana

"Discipline turns talent into ability"

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 6:40:32 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: edana

Yeah, this is actually Leonidas again

And read by... whom? Yes, I know that all of those books are listed in a typical history of the gay leather scene along with various pioneering gay magazines of the day that had the visionary boldness to show naked dicks, but when I said "The BDSM Canon" I was talking about "how to" books that someone might have actually read. Do you have any or all of those books on your shelf?


Yes - These are all 'on my shelf' (otherwise I would not have listed/commented on them) - I am a historian and bibliophile.

And, if you will note several of those are main stream books which have had a lasting impact (more so, I might state than the Gor Series - which only reached any prevalence in BDSM about 1995-6 when they became popular [again] through the internet's chat rooms and posting boards).

quote:

Know many folks who do?


Yes. Actually - many of these are archetypes for the genre and are popular even in college classrooms that teach alternative sexualities.

quote:

The Leatherman's Guide makes the list, but not the original 1972 version. Outside the underground (at the time) world of gay leather nobody really read that book in the 70s.


I would not state that was the case - however, if we are doing comparative literature, most people had not even heard of Gor (which was a knock off of the Conan series and utilized by Mr. Lange to raise money that he needed on his poor salary) until (as mentioned) it's popularity on the internet in the mid-ninties. In the interim, books such as SM101 (J. Weisman) and Sex Magik (Pat Califa) came to bear with the same genre and were popularly acclaimed within the lifestyle. And, not all of those were hom-erotica/inspired... 'The Story of O' is a definitvely the quintessential book on the subject (as fiction) that has been read by millions more than the Gor series... and, is still in popular print and read today as a 'classic'.

quote:

If Larry was able to sell 1 copy of it in the 70s for every 100 copies of Imaginative Sex sold, he was doing really really well.


As mentioned "The Leatherman's Handbook' was in it's second printing in 1974... it (and, his other books) have earned him the steady primary income which Mr. Lange has definitively lacked. Other than actually contacting the publishers, I think this would be the most 'telling' indication of the author's successes.

quote:

None of this should be construed to deny that the gay leather scene was doing SM in an organized way before anyone else in North America. On that front, they were certainly pioneers. How influencial they were, or cointinue to be, I don't know, and I don't think it can be known.


I would say a "greater influence" than Mr. Lange's tomes... as it definitively influenced all of BDSM - not just a portion thereof.

quote:

As I said in my post, I don't know, and I don't think it can be known, how infuential the Gor books or Imaginative Sex were. They were read by millions of people. How many of those folks were influenced to seek out alternative forms of sexual relations on account of them is anyone's guess. In the end it doesn't matter. It's not a contest.


Then we should agree that this discussion as a competition should never have taken place.. albeit.. we are talking about historical inference into a lifestyle that was in 'full gear' before the influnce of Mr. Lange's writings.

~J




(in reply to edana)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 8:08:04 AM   
edana


Posts: 594
Joined: 10/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I would not state that was the case - however, if we are doing comparative literature, most people had not even heard of Gor (which was a knock off of the Conan series and utilized by Mr. Lange to raise money that he needed on his poor salary) until (as mentioned) it's popularity on the internet in the mid-ninties.


Funny, when I first started out (in 1988) it seemed to be a well enough known male-dom sub-culture here in So-Cal. Well enough known, in fact, to be associated with unsavory biker types who weren't sufficiently deferential to their women for polite company. I was on "the internet" then, but not many folks were. There were some BBS style bulletin boards around at the time, though. You aren't the first one to claim that it's an internet invention, and you aren't the first one to be wrong about that. As I remember, though, not many folks that I knew at the time would have known who Larry Townsend was, and he lives here. I think we just travel in different circles.

quote:

I would say a "greater influence" than Mr. Lange's tomes... as it definitively influenced all of BDSM - not just a portion thereof.


Yeah, I know you would, and that's fine.

quote:

Larry Townsend's book is the first original "How to" manual for people involved in modern BDSM relationships.... many of the books to follow were based on this books structure and attitude towards one's partners and the means of persuing relational dynamics.


Come now. A "how to manual for people involved in modern BDSM relationships"? You can't be serious. It's a layman's guide to the gay leather scene, is it not? I'm sure that even Larry would laugh his ass off at that assessment of that particular book. He was writing about a specific scene and the etiquitte of that scene specifically for gay men, no? Seems to me, too, that just about every dyed in the wool leatherman that I've ever spoken to laments how "modern BDSM relationships" bear little resemblence to the scene that Larry was writing about (i.e. the het scene "doesn't get it"). If that book were as influential as you're claiming, you wouldn't have to keep explaining who Larry is, and what "Old Guard" means.

quote:

until (as mentioned) it's popularity on the internet in the mid-ninties. In the interim, books such as SM101 (J. Weisman) and Sex Magik (Pat Califa) came to bear with the same genre and were popularly acclaimed within the lifestyle. And, not all of those were hom-erotica/inspired...


Again, I think we just travel in differnent circles. I was identifying as a Gorean for a quite a while before the mid-nineties. I've spoken with men who have since the late 70s. Coincidently, like the original leather scene, those "old timers" are bikers. Yes, SM101 and Pat Califa's books are well known, and yes, they came long after Imaginative Sex sold lots and lots of copies. That's probably why Pat wrote the glowing intro that she did in it's reprinting. Just FYI, if you want to make the point that not everything you quote comes from the gay scene, you should mention a book or two by folks who aren't gay. There are some, you know.

quote:

As mentioned "The Leatherman's Handbook' was in it's second printing in 1974... it (and, his other books) have earned him the steady primary income which Mr. Lange has definitively lacked. Other than actually contacting the publishers, I think this would be the most 'telling' indication of the author's successes.


Or it could be more telling of the author's proclivities. As you said earlier, Dr. Lange's "day job" has always been as an academic. Maybe he fancies himself more a professor of philosophy than a purveyor of erotica. Then again, maybe he was just someone trying to raise some kids on a small salary. I don't know, and you don't either. I think that your need to potray him as the latter betrays a certain insecurity, though, and says more about you than it does about him.


quote:

'The Story of O' is a definitvely the quintessential book on the subject (as fiction) that has been read by millions more than the Gor series... and, is still in popular print and read today as a 'classic'.


Some people think so. Some others hate the book (especially the part where the protagonist agrees to be killed). Some people like the marketplace series, or the Gor books, or the Beauty series, or even the bazillion "bodice rippers" that get published each year that are pervaded with themes of sexual domination and exploitation. Is the "Story of O" quintesential? It certainly became synonymous with SM erotica for a generation in the popular lexicon, but by that standard, is Deep Throat is the quintesential porn flick? Depends on who you ask, I guess.

quote:

Then we should agree that this discussion as a competition should never have taken place.. albeit.. we are talking about historical inference into a lifestyle that was in 'full gear' before the influnce of Mr. Lange's writings.


Depending on who you ask, the scene that Townsend was writing about was already in decline when the Gor books took off. You can't really say that we're talking about "a lifestyle". Those who identified with and bought millions of Gor books and Imaginative Sex have little if any overlap with the gay motorcycle clubs and bar scenes of the 60s and 70s that Townsend was writing about. The Gor books certainly didn't have any influence on the latter, and I wouldn't claim that they did. What you're claiming is that the modern, pansexual scene is derivative of that early gay scene. In some ways yes, in other ways not so much. There have been many influences on both people's curiosity about the scene and their behavior once they found it. As I said, again, it's not a contest.

< Message edited by edana -- 11/4/2005 8:29:01 AM >


_____________________________

In service,

edana

"Discipline turns talent into ability"

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 9:39:13 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: edana

Funny, when I first started out (in 1988) it seemed to be a well enough known male-dom sub-culture here in So-Cal.


If you can provide some sort of proof of this, I would be more than happy to retract the statement - however, the earliest inference I can find to Gor was a personal's advertisement in a 1989 Chicago magazine for a "Gor-like relationship" that was desired by the correspondent.

And, I have been on the internet since the use-net groups, et al - and, have not seen anything about this in their postings and/or in their arvchives.

But, (and, again) I would love to see something countering this.


quote:

Well enough known, in fact, to be associated with unsavory biker types who weren't sufficiently deferential to their women for polite company. I was on "the internet" then, but not many folks were. There were some BBS style bulletin boards around at the time, though. You aren't the first one to claim that it's an internet invention, and you aren't the first one to be wrong about that. As I remember, though, not many folks that I knew at the time would have known who Larry Townsend was, and he lives here. I think we just travel in different circles.


Well - I knew who he was... and, although I would not state that he was common - he was better known than Mr. Lange in association with leather/BDSM.

quote:

quote:

I would say a "greater influence" than Mr. Lange's tomes... as it definitively influenced all of BDSM - not just a portion thereof.


Yeah, I know you would, and that's fine.


Well - and, again - if you can show me to be deficient, I would gladly retract this.

quote:

Come now. A "how to manual for people involved in modern BDSM relationships"? You can't be serious. It's a layman's guide to the gay leather scene, is it not? I'm sure that even Larry would laugh his ass off at that assessment of that particular book. He was writing about a specific scene and the etiquitte of that scene specifically for gay men, no? Seems to me, too, that just about every dyed in the wool leatherman that I've ever spoken to laments how "modern BDSM relationships" bear little resemblence to the scene that Larry was writing about (i.e. the het scene "doesn't get it"). If that book were as influential as you're claiming, you wouldn't have to keep explaining who Larry is, and what "Old Guard" means.


Well - apparently you have never read it... so, I would not expect you to know about this... Please do read it and note the ability of the information to trancend genders....

And, of course there are detractors... hence the 'slam' that was what the term "Old Guard" was meant to be.

But - and, again - it is the archetype for all such books since then (and, it was not fiction).


quote:

quote:

...until (as mentioned) it's popularity on the internet in the mid-ninties. In the interim, books such as SM101 (J. Weisman) and Sex Magik (Pat Califa) came to bear with the same genre and were popularly acclaimed within the lifestyle. And, not all of those were hom-erotica/inspired...


Again, I think we just travel in differnent circles. I was identifying as a Gorean for a quite a while before the mid-nineties. I've spoken with men who have since the late 70s.


I have spoken with people who claimed such as well - but, no one has been able to offer me any definitve proof of such.. an article, a posting, a book that speaks about this...

I consider everything to be BS without solid proof... (too many people earning their stripes through 'created histories'... and, there is always a trail to cultural anomolies and sub-cultural inference.

If it is there, I would definiively be interested in seeing it.


quote:

Just FYI, if you want to make the point that not everything you quote comes from the gay scene, you should mention a book or two by folks who aren't gay. There are some, you know.


Why? It does not lend them any more validity as being cultural influences... and, Pauline Reage is not gay as neither is Jay Weisman (neither was the Marquis De Sade for that matter... or Von Masoch, etc. etc. etc.)

quote:


Or it could be more telling of the author's proclivities. As you said earlier, Dr. Lange's "day job" has always been as an academic. Maybe he fancies himself more a professor of philosophy than a purveyor of erotica. Then again, maybe he was just someone trying to raise some kids on a small salary. I don't know, and you don't either.


I don't believe I have (in any way) demeaned Mr. Lange. He is what he is, as are we all.

But, insulting someone's 'proclivities' (when this is what we are all about) and, (if anything) the fact that Mr. Townsend publically and privately 'walked the walk' (vice simply writing about it) should be reason for a celebration of his life, rather than consternation and condemnation about his "proclivities'.

This is rather a specious basis for the decrying someone, their writings, and their life's work.


quote:

I think that your need to potray him as the latter betrays a certain insecurity, though, and says more about you than it does about him.


LOL.... nice twist to the personal epitaph in order to sully the waters; but, no dice.

I am stating facts and asking for positive correction of anything that is not true. If you have some sort of proof (in writing, in print, on the internet, by historical note, etc.) - I would be more than happy to retract anything I have written here or anywhere else.

History is part conjecture... but, that conjecture is based on certainty as provided by proof. I am always interested in accuracy.

If what you surmise and state is true - please provide something to demonstrate it.

quote:

quote:

'The Story of O' is a definitvely the quintessential book on the subject (as fiction) that has been read by millions more than the Gor series... and, is still in popular print and read today as a 'classic'.


Some people think so. Some others hate the book (especially the part where the protagonist agrees to be killed). Some people like the marketplace series, or the Gor books, or the Beauty series, or even the bazillion "bodice rippers" that get published each year that are pervaded with themes of sexual domination and exploitation. Is the "Story of O" quintesential? It certainly became synonymous with SM erotica for a generation in the popular lexicon, but by that standard, is Deep Throat is the quintesential porn flick? Depends on who you ask, I guess.


Well - I am sure it is found in more libraries than the Gor series - and, has earned the title of "classic' - so, I suppose that (despite the detractors) there is a consensus by people who are more astute than either of us

quote:

quote:

Then we should agree that this discussion as a competition should never have taken place.. albeit.. we are talking about historical inference into a lifestyle that was in 'full gear' before the influnce of Mr. Lange's writings.


Depending on who you ask, the scene that Townsend was writing about was already in decline when the Gor books took off.


I am not about to give you a history lesson - but, suffice it to say that this is untrue.

All movements evolve.... and, Larry was one portion of the history of leather that has pervaded the psyche of generations since.

As far as heterosexual movements - you might consider the history of The Mattachine Society, TES, Janus, PeP as a few of the organizations that were/are prevalent in the American heterosexual/pansexual scene that predate the influence and/or writings of 'Gor" - and, are based in the cultural movements of the times they were established and exist(ed) in.

quote:

You can't really say that we're talking about "a lifestyle".


I know of millions of people who would legitimately argue with this point. For you we might not belong to a 'lifestyle' - but then, for they you probably are associating yourself with books who's original purpose was to keep pubescent teens in thrall while a publisher raked in some dough and the author was paid a pittance for the effort.

But, who is to say?

Depends upon whom you speak with... and, the actuality of the proof available.

I am exceptionally willing to be proven incorrect in order to learn more for our common history.

~J

(in reply to edana)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 11:34:59 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

If you can provide some sort of proof of this, I would be more than happy to retract the statement - however, the earliest inference I can find to Gor was a personal's advertisement in a 1989 Chicago magazine for a "Gor-like relationship" that was desired by the correspondent.


Had to laugh when I saw this. Yeah, I'm afraid that I don't have any 20 year old copies of the L.A. Weekly lying around to offer you as proof.

quote:

And, I have been on the internet since the use-net groups, et al - and, have not seen anything about this in their postings and/or in their arvchives.


Really? Your memory must not be as long as mine. The Gor books and their influence were fairly regularly mentioned on a.s.b. (both positively and negatively) pretty much from its inception. Here's a typical example from 1991:

After all, how many people have been (to a greater or lesser extent) influenced by the "Gor" novels, if ONLY to the fact it gave them ideas or kept 'em going? -- Posted by Bill Blanton from Berkeley.

Unfortunatley, asb only goes back to 1989, and in its early days the folks who used it were over-represented by computer geeks. Not the place where you'd find lots of the "slave bitch on the back of my scooter" types. Neither, for that matter, are ads in personals rags. You might say that a.s.b wasn't very influential in "the scene", but you before you do, you might want to consider that terms like BDSM and TPE were coined there. Sorry I can't give you more. I do know that inquiring minds like to know.

quote:

Well - I knew who he was... and, although I would not state that he was common - he was better known than Mr. Lange in association with leather/BDSM.


Never said that you didn't know who he was. Then again, you claim to be pretty big in the NLA don't you? It would stand to reason that you would.

quote:

Well - apparently you have never read it... so, I would not expect you to know about this... Please do read it and note the ability of the information to trancend genders....


Huh? Are you trying to say that it's not a primer for those wanting to partake of the gay leather scene? Have you read it? I'm not disputing that if you give it enough thought that you couldn't find things of value even if you're not a gay man, but "the first how-to for modern BDSM relationships" it ain't. Imaginative Sex was written for folks who had never considered anything more adventurous than the missionary position. That's who bought it. Larry's book was written for gay men who wanted to get into the leather scene without spending gobs of time cruising before they finally met the "knowledgable people". Both books had influence with their intended audiences, I'm sure. It's hard to argue that one audience isn't just a tad larger than the other, though.

quote:

I consider everything to be BS without solid proof...


As is your right. You must have me confused with someone who is trying to convince you.

quote:

But, insulting someone's 'proclivities' (when this is what we are all about) and, (if anything) the fact that Mr. Townsend publically and privately 'walked the walk' (vice simply writing about it) should be reason for a celebration of his life, rather than consternation and condemnation about his "proclivities'.


The only proclivity that I was referring to was Larry's proclivity to have his entire life revolve around the scene and his writings about it, and, possibly, Dr. Lange's proclivity to prefer to be a philosophy professor. I don't think that it's more a tribute to Larry's success that he is still selling books, rather, that he decided to make it his life's work. Maybe Dr. Lange wanted to also, and failed, and maybe not. I don't know, and your assertions notwithstanding, neither do you.

quote:

I am stating facts and asking for positive correction of anything that is not true. If you have some sort of proof (in writing, in print, on the internet, by historical note, etc.) - I would be more than happy to retract anything I have written here or anywhere else.


I see. So the game goes that when you say something it's a fact, and I need to prove you wrong, and when I say something it's bullshit and need to prove to you that I'm right? Do excuse me if I excuse myself from that game. You made some statements of "fact" about Dr. Lange that you would only be in a position to know if you knew him pretty damned intimately. Have you any proof, or are you the only one that gets to demand that?

quote:

Well - I am sure it is found in more libraries than the Gor series


Hmmm... when I search the public library system in my town, I get both the Story of O and 10 of the Gor books. Is this another one of your provable facts?

quote:

I am not about to give you a history lesson - but, suffice it to say that this is untrue.


According to you. Jay Wiseman has written that about that time (the late 60s) organizations like Janus were slowly seeing more heterosexuals, and that the "Old Guard" of gay leathermen were already complaining along the lines of "there goes the neighborhood". The highly ritualized "bottoms never approach tops first, and switching is not allowed" culture of the post-war biker scene was fading and moving toward the "anything goes" BDSM culture that you see today. Yes, you can spare me the history lesson, unless you were there, and I don't think you're that old.

quote:

I know of millions of people who would legitimately argue with this point.


Damn you're popular. I think it's be a stretch to say that I know hundreds of people, and I really get around (I'm writing this from London).

quote:

For you we might not belong to a 'lifestyle' - but then, for they you probably are associating yourself with books who's original purpose was to keep pubescent teens in thrall while a publisher raked in some dough and the author was paid a pittance for the effort.


What I was saying is that there isn't a lifestyle. There are many, each with influences of their own. I know that it's attractive to you to attribute much of the scene today to influence of the leather culture, but in point of fact it doesn't have much influence on not only folks like me, but others who simply never were around that culture.




< Message edited by Leonidas -- 11/4/2005 12:14:42 PM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 12:38:11 PM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

Had to laugh when I saw this. Yeah, I'm afraid that I don't have any 20 year old copies of the L.A. Weekly lying around to offer you as proof.


No, but they exist.. so, it would be a boon to find such proof offered when a claim is made.

quote:

Really? Your memory must not be as long as mine. The Gor books were and their influence were fairly regularly mentioned on a.s.b. (both positively and negatively) pretty much from its inception. Here's a typical example from 1991:

After all, how many people have been (to a greater or lesser extent) influenced by the "Gor" novels, if ONLY to the fact it gave them ideas or kept 'em going? -- Posted by Bill Blanton from Berkeley.


Would you provide a link for this, please. As it does not post date the advertisement I mentioned... it is not especially of interest - but, it is good information.

quote:

Unfortunatley, asb only goes back to 1989, and in its early days the folks who used it were over-represented by computer geeks. Not the place where you'd find lots of the "slave bitch on the back of my scooter" types. Neither, for that matter, are ads in personals rags. You might say that a.s.b wasn't very influential in "the scene", but you before you do, you might want to consider that terms like BDSM and TPE were coined there. Sorry I can't give you more. I do know that inquiring minds like to know.


A lot of the usenet boards go back to about 1986 - a check of them did not reveal anything akin to Gor.

quote:

quote:

Well - I knew who he was... and, although I would not state that he was common - he was better known than Mr. Lange in association with leather/BDSM.


Never said that you didn't know who he was. Then again, you claim to be pretty big in the NLA don't you? It would stand to reason that you would.


I never claimed to be "anything" associated with the NLA... and, the inference is in need of an explanation.

Please, do explain why you have an issue with things that are considered to be gay oriented or the NLA in particular. It would prove interesting to know why there is a specific prejudice in your writing about leather history.


quote:

quote:

Well - apparently you have never read it... so, I would not expect you to know about this... Please do read it and note the ability of the information to trancend genders....


Huh? Are you trying to say that it's not a primer for those wanting to partake of the gay leather scene?


I am saying it was the archetype for such manuals and has a lot of information and means that are still in use today... and - you did not read it - so, exactly where would you get your information about it. (nice try to deflect the issue of your lack of knowledge about it).

quote:

Have you read it?


Yup... and, I have several copies so you might finally find out what you are talking about in this regard.

quote:

I'm not disputing that if you give it enough thought that you couldn't find things of value even if you're not a gay man, but "the first how-to for modern BDSM relationships" it ain't.


If you read it we could both have a good chuckle about this.

quote:

Imaginative Sex was written for folks who had never considered anything more adventurous than the missionary position. That's who bought it.


Interestingly, "The Joy of Sex" was published in 1972 - so apparently Mr. Lange was following up on its popularity of the time.

quote:

Larry's book was written for gay men who wanted to get into the leather scene without spending gobs of time cruising before they finally met the "knowledgable people".


Yup - and emulated by generations of various sexualitied (is that a word) writers since that time...

quote:

Both books had influence with their intended audiences, I'm sure. It's hard to argue that one audience isn't just a tad larger than the other, though.


Never said it was or did - simply stated that Mr. Townsend made his living from writing... Mr. lange did not... and, that is good evidence of populatrity and influence.

quote:

quote:

I consider everything to be BS without solid proof...


As is your right. You must have me confused with someone who is trying to convince you.


Nope - you are - and, everyone else reading along. As I said - I am willing to be disproved... and, you are not apparently here to do that.

quote:

quote:

But, insulting someone's 'proclivities' (when this is what we are all about) and, (if anything) the fact that Mr. Townsend publically and privately 'walked the walk' (vice simply writing about it) should be reason for a celebration of his life, rather than consternation and condemnation about his "proclivities'.


The only proclivity that I was referring to was Larry's proclivity to have his entire life revolve around the scene and his writings about it, and, possibly, Dr. Lange's proclivity to prefer to be a philosophy professor. I don't think that it's more a tribute to Larry's success that he is still selling books, rather, that he decided to make it his life's work. Maybe Dr. Lange wanted to also, and failed, and maybe not. I don't know, and your assertions notwithstanding, neither do you.


Nice - however, you are the one who demeaned an author based on his life and life choices.... and, again - it does not wash that 'because' someone has had their entire life 'revolve around leather' this is a "bad thing".... as mentioned... he did more than talk or post on a board about it.

quote:

quote:

I am stating facts and asking for positive correction of anything that is not true. If you have some sort of proof (in writing, in print, on the internet, by historical note, etc.) - I would be more than happy to retract anything I have written here or anywhere else.


I see. So the game goes that when you say something it's a fact, and I need to prove you wrong, and when I say something it's bullshit and need to prove to you that I'm right?


No - it is not a game... if you have proof of your assertions, I would love to see them. Other than that... you are simply 'blowing smoke' up our collective rears and trying to manipulate the conversation away from the original subject by making it personal.

quote:

You made some statements of "fact" about Dr. Lange that you would only be in a position to know if you knew him pretty damned intimately. Have you any proof, or are you the only one that gets to demand that?


Please provide specific statements I made about Mr. Lange, and and I will review them and provide you with the information. These are all things that have been researched this past summer - and, I am sure it is still available

quote:

According to you. Jay Wiseman has written that about that time (the late 60s) organizations like Janus were slowly seeing more heterosexuals, and that the "Old Guard" of gay leathermen were already complaining along the lines of "there goes the neighborhood". The highly ritualized "bottoms never approach tops first, and switching is not allowed" culture of the post-war biker scene was fading and moving toward the "anything goes" BDSM culture that you see today. Yes, you can spare me the history lesson, unless you were there, and I don't think you're that old.


I never stated anything about Jay except that he is not gay. Janus was started as a pansexual organization as was TES. The whole "bottoms never approach a top" idiom you provide was never stated by me. All of the things I mentoin are well documented.. And, I do not know where the rant came from.

quote:

quote:

For you we might not belong to a 'lifestyle' - but then, for they you probably are associating yourself with books who's original purpose was to keep pubescent teens in thrall while a publisher raked in some dough and the author was paid a pittance for the effort.


What I was saying is that there isn't a lifestyle. There are many, each with influences of their own. I know that it's attractive to you to attribute much of the scene today to influence of the leather culture, but in point of fact it doesn't have much influence on not only folks like me, but others who simply never were around that culture.


But, then you repeat yourself. And, relativism and the rhetoric associated with it to escape a discussion is not unique, original, or a compelling way to end a discussion

~J


(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/4/2005 1:38:00 PM   
edana


Posts: 594
Joined: 10/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Would you provide a link for this, please. As it does not post date the advertisement I mentioned... it is not especially of interest - but, it is good information.


I took it directly from the a.s.b (alt.sex.bondage) archieve. I understand that DejaNews is still around though. If you do a little poking, I'm sure you can find it. If not, let me know and I'll probably be able to dig up a link to the thread somehwere on the web for you.

quote:

A lot of the usenet boards go back to about 1986 - a check of them did not reveal anything akin to Gor.


Some of them go back even further, but you won't find a lot of scene related information on them in an accessible way before a.s.b. started in '89.

quote:

Please, do explain why you have an issue with things that are considered to be gay oriented or the NLA in particular. It would prove interesting to know why there is a specific prejudice in your writing about leather history.


Seems to me that you said that you and Rover both belonged to the same "National Organization" and he mentioned the NLA. Am I mistaken? At any rate, what issue do you think I have with it? I said that, as an NLA member you'd be more familliar than the average kinkster with a book about the leather scene. If I said that as a communist you'd be more likely to be familliar with the works of Marx, would you be similarly offended?

quote:

Interestingly, "The Joy of Sex" was published in 1972 - so apparently Mr. Lange was following up on its popularity of the time.


Yeah, it was, and no, he wasn't. So that's Conan and The Joy of Sex. Are there any other books that you'd like to say he tried to capitalize on? He does discuss food in his books, and I think that there was a Betty Crocker cookbook pubished just the year before. Hmmm... yeah, I think he was rippin' off Betty too. You must know him far more intimately than I do. I didn't happen to be there when he was discussing these things with his publisher. He did do a cliff-hanger ending to one of his novels the same year that JR got shot. Hey, you hang around this thread long enough, I'll give you something to knock about him for free. Happy?

quote:

Never said it was or did - simply stated that Mr. Townsend made his living from writing... Mr. lange did not... and, that is good evidence of populatrity and influence.


Alright, here's one of those assertions. How the hell do you know he never made a living from it? For all you know, he made a dollar fifty for every dime Townsend ever made from his books, stuck it in a trust for his kids, and went back to being a philosophy professor. Alright, you've asked me to challenge one of your assertions. There you go. Fish, or cut bait. Can you prove this statment or are you, as you said, blowing smoke?

quote:

Nope - you are - and, everyone else reading along. As I said - I am willing to be disproved... and, you are not apparently here to do that.


You're doing a good enough job all on your own, skippy. You said that there was nothing about Gor on the usenet, and that it had no influence on the scene before the mid-nineties. I showed you where that just ain't so. People were discussing it on the Usenet as an influence in the scene years before that. You keep making these assertions about Gor and the author of the Gor books like you know everything about it, when really, you know about jack.

quote:

I never stated anything about Jay except that he is not gay. Janus was started as a pansexual organization as was TES. The whole "bottoms never approach a top" idiom you provide was never stated by me. All of the things I mentoin are well documented.. And, I do not know where the rant came from.


Ok, try to stay with me here. I said that the scene that Towsend was describing in his circa '72 book was (according to some) already in decline at the time that the Gor books started getting popular. You said that wasn't so (though you weren't going to give me a history lesson). Somebody who was there (Jay) thought otherwise, and wrote it down, as I said (I'd be happy to send you the article). Are you really not following the conversation here, or are you just wiggling?

quote:

But, then you repeat yourself. And, relativism and the rhetoric associated with it to escape a discussion is not unique, original, or a compelling way to end a discussion


Yeah, ok, should have known better. Always ends up this way with you, doesn't it? Alright, that'll be enough. C'ya.

< Message edited by edana -- 11/4/2005 2:01:12 PM >


_____________________________

In service,

edana

"Discipline turns talent into ability"

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/9/2005 8:38:44 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: edana

I took it directly from the a.s.b (alt.sex.bondage) archieve. I understand that DejaNews is still around though. If you do a little poking, I'm sure you can find it. If not, let me know and I'll probably be able to dig up a link to the thread somehwere on the web for you.


I am not finding this at all.... if you would.

quote:


Seems to me that you said that you and Rover both belonged to the same "National Organization" and he mentioned the NLA. Am I mistaken?


You are mistaken. I never stated anything of the kind on this board.

quote:

At any rate, what issue do you think I have with it?


I do not know - but, every time something from leather history is mentioned you (figuratively) 'skeeve' - and try sliding the conversation away from this and any inference assoiciated with it - as though the gay community were either moot to the history of leather and/or is dissociated (in some vague way) from who we are today.

I find it odd, but as a predictable element of your conversations out here - it interests me to know what goes on in your head when these things are mentioned. Hence the question.


quote:

I said that, as an NLA member you'd be more familliar than the average kinkster with a book about the leather scene.


The correlation in this is silly.

I know people who support the arts who are ignorant of anything about art at all.. they do it because it is in vogue.

No matter what organization I belong to, it does not educate me... I read - everyting I can get my hands on.

Give it a try... Amazon has the Leatherman's Handbook for 13.99$US


quote:

Yeah, it was, and no, he wasn't. So that's Conan and The Joy of Sex. Are there any other books that you'd like to say he tried to capitalize on?


Nope - although my inference to Conan (as through the writings of Howard) is my own.. that is what his books are like to me, as when I finished reading the Conan series in the 1960's/early 70's I tried picking up the Gor series...

Most people compare him (as apparently he compared himself) to Bourroughs' teenaged boy aimed "Barsoom series" of books.

And, because I point out other books that are similar and definitively had a greater impact on society, culture, and/or sales than Mr. Lange's does not demean him as an individual or an author )no need to be touchy about his lack of sales).


quote:

You must know him far more intimately than I do.


Well - we are deinfinitively not 'butt buddies'... and, I am not a soul mate by any stretch of the imagination; but I have looked into him pretty intensively as an icon of a sub-movement in this sub-cuclture.. so, I know a bit about him. Thank you for noticing.

And, - how well do you know him?


quote:

I didn't happen to be there when he was discussing these things with his publisher.


I did not imagine you were... wait a minute... you are trying to be funnily sardonic in order to sway the conversaqtion about your lack of knowledge about leather history - aren't you. (I do catch on at times)

quote:

He did do a cliff-hanger ending to one of his novels the same year that JR got shot.


Would you provide the link for this.

quote:

Hey, you hang around this thread long enough, I'll give you something to knock about him for free.


Actually - I have not "knocked him at all" - just your interpretation of he and his writings, and your statements that have no bearing on reality relative to history, historical data and books. And, then I have been very gentle.

quote:

Happy?


Pretty much all the time (the drugs help)

quote:

Alright, here's one of those assertions. How the hell do you know he never made a living from it?


You stated that "No one can ever know whether he was more popular a writer than Mr. Townsend" (paraphrase)- I made the point that this was not his primary income (he is an associate professor at a college... and, he has stated that he started writing for suplemental income for his family) - whereas, Mr. Townsend has earned a living through his writings.... (it seems pretty obvious without this repetitious explanation - but, then - and, again - rhetoric seems to be the objective here).

If I am wrong, please do show me where.


quote:

For all you know, he made a dollar fifty for every dime Townsend ever made from his books, stuck it in a trust for his kids, and went back to being a philosophy professor. Alright, you've asked me to challenge one of your assertions. There you go. Fish, or cut bait. Can you prove this statment or are you, as you said, blowing smoke?


Please, read the above and then read along carefully -

... Mr. Lange is an associate professor at a community college and an author...

and, Mr. Townsend simply writes and is an author for his bacon...

What is there to prove here?


quote:

Nope - you are - and, everyone else reading along. As I said - I am willing to be disproved... and, you are not apparently here to do that.


quote:

You're doing a good enough job all on your own, skippy. You said that there was nothing about Gor on the usenet,


No - I said I have not seen anything about them on the usenet. Try to read more carefully, Spanky (are these the pet names we will use to scene with?).


quote:

I saoid there was nothing sifn and that it had no influence on the scene before the mid-nineties.


No - I said it gained popularity in the mid-ninties (hey - but, read what you want... want some of my 'happy' drugs'?

quote:

I showed you where that just ain't so.


I stated that I would like a link... and, you have not sought to provide that... so I ain't been shown nuttin honey... ('Damned Myrna - that there is a twister!!')

quote:

People were discussing it on the Usenet as an influence in the scene years before that.


Then show us the 'money honey'.... you can say this over and over again... but, 'That dog don;t walk if it ain't got legs'


quote:

You keep making these assertions about Gor and the author of the Gor books like you know everything about it, when really, you know about jack.


Um - I am not making assertions.. simply pointing things out.. please - and again - what suppositions have I made that have offended you so deeply (you are a sensitive sort of warrior, aren't you?')


quote:

Ok, try to stay with me here. I said that the scene that Towsend was describing in his circa '72 book was (according to some) already in decline at the time that the Gor books started getting popular. You said that wasn't so (though you weren't going to give me a history lesson). Somebody who was there (Jay) thought otherwise, and wrote it down, as I said (I'd be happy to send you the article). Are you really not following the conversation here, or are you just wiggling?


Wow - you need to go back and re-read the thread.

quote:

Yeah, ok, should have known better. Always ends up this way with you, doesn't it? Alright, that'll be enough. C'ya.


Um - yeah.. you are definitvely on the 'high road' here.

As always - a sincere pleasure to have an intellectual conversations with you.

~J

(in reply to edana)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/9/2005 11:14:27 AM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I am not finding this at all.... if you would.


Sure, always happy to come to the rescue of the 'net challenged. Here you go:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sex.bondage/browse_thread/thread/bcc2da7829af30e1/36723f4484be6641?lnk=st&q=Gor+group:alt.sex.bondage&rnum=127&hl=en#36723f4484be6641

It looks like Google bought DejaNews, so you'll probably be able to search all of the a.s.b. archieves. You'll find lots of mention and discussion about the Gor books back as far as the group goes ('89-'90 timeframe). There is lots of generally good stuff in there if you have time to sift through. It was a good group until it got spammed out of existance. Have fun.

P.S. Something caught my eye while I was finding this for you that I'd forgotten about. Eric Raymond once wrote an analysis of the premises behind the Gor novels in a.s.b. You may not know who Eric is, but anyone involved with open source software would. He wrote the seminal book on the subject titled "The Cathedral and the Bazaar". Like I said above, a.s.b. was pretty heavy on computer geeks in those pre-www days.

< Message edited by Leonidas -- 11/9/2005 11:30:47 AM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/10/2005 7:26:38 AM   
LordODiscipline


Posts: 995
Joined: 6/28/2004
Status: offline
Thank you - I appreciate this sincerely...

If anyone has (or, knows of) references to Gor previous to this (inference into the subculture), it would (also) be greatly appreciated.

Commentary: Although this link demonstates a consideration of Gor's influence over people's lives within the context of BDSM, it is not something that is more than that.

Much like the aforementioned personal's advertisement in a Chicago magazine dating from 1989 (which talks about "Gor like" desire to the relational dynamic), there is little evidence that Gor was incorporated as a philosophy within the context of it at an earlier time.

It is however, important - as it demonstrates an evolutionary thought process that (might have?) contributed to the development of 'Gorean' means.

Allegations of this nature have been made by many people within our subculture and present a lot of speculation about their veracity. As such, I (and, many others) deeply desire to know where "Gor" (as a philosophy and exemplar of personal ethos within our common history) originated from.

I would really appreciate any information that someone might have (in print, on the net, or through magazine articles, letters, journals, et al) provably dated prior to such known influence in order to establish both time lines and peoples that are associated.

As I mentioned, I am sincerely a historian (of little note, mind you) who is seeking all information about our subculture's history so we might 'know who we are' now and going forward.

It might not be important to most people - but, it is very important to those of us who sincerely care about where we are going from here.

Thank you for your time.

~J

(in reply to Leonidas)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/10/2005 11:49:03 AM   
submissivesilk


Posts: 154
Joined: 1/30/2005
Status: offline
hmmm sorry about that, guess i didn't read the fine print on the site.

< Message edited by submissivesilk -- 11/10/2005 6:37:07 PM >

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Knowing John Norman - 11/10/2005 1:57:25 PM   
Leonidas


Posts: 2078
Joined: 2/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Commentary: Although this link demonstates a consideration of Gor's influence over people's lives within the context of BDSM, it is not something that is more than that.

Much like the aforementioned personal's advertisement in a Chicago magazine dating from 1989 (which talks about "Gor like" desire to the relational dynamic), there is little evidence that Gor was incorporated as a philosophy within the context of it at an earlier time.


Did someone around here say that it was? I said that it's impossible to estimate the influence of the Gor books on the scene. You said that they weren't much discussed before the late 90s. I showed you where that just isn't so. By the time those posts were made in the early 90s, the books had already been out of print a few years. If that same group had started up 5 or 10 years before, I have absolutely no doubt that there would have been far more discussion of what was to be found in the Gor books, not less. I have no doubt, having been around a while, that the Gor books had a considerable influence, both in terms of exposing large numbers of people to the notion of D/s sexuality and giving them "ideas" as that post said.

Those who profess to follow a Gorean code or philosophy outside the context of M/s relations (as opposed to someone who just read the Gor books and got interested in lifestyle M/s because of them and drew ideas about lifestyle M/s from them) is a different proposition altogether. Those folks don't have much influence on "the scene" because, like me, they've never really been a part of "the scene", and don't care to be. Our philosophy about both M/s and life in general is incompatable with that of the BDSM mainstream, which suits both us and the BDSM mainstream just fine. Throughout this thread you seem to be trying to protect the bragging rights of the leather scene for being the philosophical underpinning of the BDSM scene that exists today. I'm more than happy to conceed those bragging rights. Way, way, more than happy. Most of the men that I know who would claim to hold by a Gorean philosophy would tell you the same.

< Message edited by Leonidas -- 11/10/2005 2:00:44 PM >


_____________________________

Take care of yourself

Leonidas

(in reply to LordODiscipline)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> Knowing John Norman Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.344