eponavet
Posts: 406
Joined: 8/18/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
Tal and greetings all, I am opening this topic for the reason expressed in the title. Simply for people to ask questions and hopefully some of the great men and women around here will be kind enough to answer. It is an invitation to those new people around here, those lurkers, those people just passing by, to ask a question without having to start an entirely new subject. I know, I can already here the groans, about if they seriously wanted answers they would take the initiative to start the topic... I simply remind these folks that others are afraid to be pounced upon, by the "brutal, elitist, Goreans". So in a good faith effort, I open this up for any and all questions, only asking that you remember to use a bit of common courtesy. I wish you all well, Thadius hi....i am respectfully writing this as a sincere inquiry from someone who is naturally submissive, but who doesn't follow this core philosophy. I am hoping that my questions will be seen for what they are - my own thoughts as they spiral tangentally from one topic to the next. I read a lot of this thread, as well as some of the other threads, and i am quite sure that what i ask may have been discussed and i just haven't found the posts yet. So i apologize if my inquiries are in any way intrusive or ignorant. Where does someone like a female medical doctor (or veterinarian) fit into these core beliefs? For me, i may be naturally submissive, and part of that is caring for others...but it also has inhibited me from being a 24/7 sub...or slave etc. because i am on call and if work calls in the middle of playtime, or chores or what have you...it comes first. Where would that fit into a Gorean household? Would a woman like that automatically be considered a FW, even though she is submissive by nature? Obviously, in my own pesronal case, i am not owned property, so it is not a personal dilemma, but my mind wanders to the "what if" realm rather quickly. It also begs the next question of me being naturally submissive, but also of having to be Dominant in certain work related scenarios and how to balance that and why i absolutely LOVE being able to run away from those Dominant moments when work is done. But i love my work. And then, i wondered about children. From reading about the Gorean philosphies and the Natural Order of things as seen by people who subscribe to this system, how would you deal with a gay child? I know every situation is unique, and there is no one rule that applies to all, but again, my mind wandered down that path and i didn't see it addressed, so....i ask. I don't have children - can't have them - and i am not gay, i jsut start thinking of obscure scenarios and like the little 5 year old, keep asking "why?" "why?" "why?" I hope my initial inquires will lead to me being able to ask more...i am new here, and i have a different perspective, but i am a seeker...and i always like to learn about other views, lifestyles etc. I read somewhere that non-Goreans are considered "enemies of Gor" or something to that effect, but...i hope to make friends here, with similar views as mine as well as different ones. i thank everyone in advance for reading...and this quote was helpful as well: quote:
I see no men have spoken to this latest in the question recently posed by Missturbation and then again in a slightly different context by MsJssk. So I'll pose my three cents so as to at least demonstrate that the ideas and content of what is Gorean principle is not constructed or organized by women but it is they rather that follow, but yet often enough inspire the men they so trust to remain steadfast, noble and honorable as personal nature will allow. It is not that all women are committed personally to a single man, but all free are pledged to a community or a homestone unless determined to be of a rogue nature. In this pledge of loyalty that is of utmost importance to the Gorean free we find belonging and community, fellowship and prosperity. Gor or to be Gorean is to simply being a free person set to understand and apply the principles and philosophies that are defined within the lives of the characters in the novels. No different than other books that use storied traditions and parables to impart social and personal wisdoms onto succeeding generations the books of Gor have become guides to the collective framework of the Gorean individuals and communities at large. To be free is a simple term, even to the Gorean. There may be those that would intend to elevate a simple phrase to hold a much more significant meaning, but the term free is simply that, free men or women are un-owned; they have no “master”. The slave is that, the man or women that has been in today’s societal tolerance a mastered person. I love the idea of owning a beautiful wench, naked at my feet in a legal sense, but I am a law biding American male, faithful to the laws of my Home Stone, unless speeding be considered. I plead the fifth on that. Not to diminish the significance of freedom I’ll elaborate on my idea of what the Gorean Free Man and Woman are. As I said, if you are not owned human property, you are free; this would be the case with a Ubar (a King) or a she urt (a homeless river tramp) on the canals of Port Kar. It is in fact the personage or the community that elevates the station of ones individual status as free. Marlenus of Ar is deemed Ubar of Ubars by his hand and the acceptance of this notion by his fellow man. Hence, his personal accountability and credibility have elevated his status as a free man. It is no different with the free woman; it is her own personal merits that hold her as either a Lofty Gorean Free Woman or a she urt simply existing through her days. (An urt is indecently is actually the Gorean term referring to a rat like creature, so I would suppose that you might be able to better understand the common reference) I suspect that when you pass through the Gorean sections of message boards across the web it wouldn’t take long to determine who might be viewed as lofty free men and women and who might simply be free as a moment happenstance. Take the women Angel, she is attempting to find her feet as a free at this point in time, I believe it is certain her internal nature is suitable for that of a slave yet she has yet to be properly claimed and conquered by a man. Look at the woman Kimveri, she is without doubt a women that would be seen as a Lofty Gorean Free Woman. Her demeanor and personal pride and character ooze forth with the vision of freedom claimed. The Gorean experience is certainly only within the throws of its infancy; we are just now debating on the meaningful ideas and agendas that will hopefully rebuild nobility from forgotten cultures and hatch new venues and understanding for the course of what is our vision of humanity. No being a Gorean is not the “one true” answer and at this time it certainly isn’t for everyone. But it may be what many of us see as the human condition gone right, when personal nature, responsibility and accountability are not only accepted but cherished. So you see why Goreans may because of our acceptance of the M/s dynamic often be called kinksters and BDSMer’s we are not all that simply labeled. Many of us may in fact enjoy kinks that would be seen as BDSM in nature but these pleasures are not that which ultimately define us. I would imagine that most labeled as BDSMer’s should not ever be so quickly named. I have a valued friend that is a very respected Leatherman and I simply call him a friend. JL may be a sadistic SOB, but he is so much more than that. Philosophies seem to be found in the most unique of places. Wouldn’t you say? I hope this adds to the perspective of what is a Gorean free… I’m sure that more will soon follow.
< Message edited by eponavet -- 1/12/2009 11:31:22 AM >
_____________________________
~ You are a child of the Universe, no less than the trees and the stars. You have a right to be here, and whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the Universe is unfolding as it should ~
|