amelliagrace
Posts: 1792
Joined: 8/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Every girl is different, and every girl has different circumstances. Hence, whether to keep her isn't a matter of good or bad, but an appropriate match or not given both the girl and the particular man. Something that factors in along with Tim's statement above, is that infamous, ever raging, and likely never-to-be-laid-to-rest debate of where "submissive girlfriend" leaves off, and "slave" begins. The answer to that little riddle, of course, varries exponentially from one man to another, one relationship to another. So far with regard to the discussion at hand, it seems there is general agreement that such decisions must be made carefully and with considerable thought, that being responsible and mature are key elements on both the Master and slave sides of this, that what is best for UMs is a totally different matter from UMs being placed in the place of preiminence in the day to day of a household. What has not been said here, in so many words, is that not all men want to have you-know-whats around. Fewer still want those who sprung from the loins of another. It is a reality no different from that faced by nilla singles. And even though it often goes unmentioned, single men face the exact same challenge as single women. "Masters" being "men", those same two factors greatly limit the number of potential Masters who will consider taking on a girl with ums, since there are far fewer potential Masters than males to begin with. Even in the best of circumstances, finding a good mate or partner or whatever, is challenging. Even then, longevity is an issue. While most in this forum will, I'm sure, acknowledge that "till death do us part" relationships are not the only happy ones, most healthy people I know do seek longevity. Seriously, how manyof you personally know of long term (as in ten years or longer) M/s relationships? How many of those have you, personally, seen? "Compromise" is not a word heard often in this Gorean forum. The truth remains that there are always necessary choices to be made in life, and many of those choices constitute either short or long term compromises. Bare with me for a moment here... Perhaps if there was less seeking of "Masters" and "slaves", and more emphasis on seeking compatibility on philosophical, spiritual, and practical levels, more individuals would wind up with that they seek - and in long term relationships. Labels are but sometime useful trappings. I'd wager most if not all of us have known "slaves" that weren't, and girlfirends or spouses who were slave in everthing but lable. JMO, and a non-Gorean one at that, I personally prefer substance over trappings. Can't find a "Gorean" Master or slave who wants your personal bag of responsibilities? Seek out a good match, a fine individual, who shares your basic views on the most important stuff of life. You just might find that regardless of what it is called, you've discovered what you sought. Heck, they might even be Gorean or slave or Master, and not even know it. You might even discover that their not being so turns out to be a moot point, if the fit is a fine one. My apologies if this post is seen as a too tangentical or a derailment. Grace
< Message edited by amelliagrace -- 7/3/2008 7:08:03 AM >
|