OrionTheWolf
Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006 Status: offline
|
Greetings Zarath, quote:
ORIGINAL: SirZarath Tal Orion, I didn't mean to mess up things with terminology, but still our difference in use of words leads to some thoughts on my side. It's interesting that you speak of Good *owners* and Bad *owners* in stead of Good and Bad Masters. An *owner* is defined by the fact that he owns something, in this case a slave. And of course the mere fact of *owning* a slave, a state of affairs that could theoretically be reached by the mere act of purchasing one, can lead to the situation that the owner is indeed a bad one. We are in complete agreement here. Many Goreans have owned slaves, and then realize that either they no longer want a slave, they prefer the Free Companion route, or that they are not very good owners. The word Master for Gorean is either 1) denotes an owner of slave/s or 2) an address a slave uses when speaking to a Free Man. quote:
But this is something different than what I meant. I was not using the word *owner* but in stead the word Master. And here is where the confusion arises I think. As in Gor, all Free men are addressed as 'Master' by the kajiri, the term Master gets an entirely different meaning than in the BDSM, D/s and M/s lifestyles, where one is only entitled to the term "Master" by deserving it first or in some other circles, the term is only used by the owned slave towards his/her owner and not towards other dominants (yes, noun again). From this perspective it is possible to speak of true and fake Masters, but I can understand that in Gorean terms this leads to confusion. On the BDSM side it still can be somewhat muddied, as different and standards can apply. I think we can universally use "bad people", to describe either. Also, my study of various Eastern philosophies has taught me that mastering ourselves is an ongoing process as we continue to grow. quote:
Another thought that comes up here is that in the Earthly D/s and M/s circles, consensuality plays an important part and a slave is never 'taken' and rarely 'purchased'. Now, knowing the BDSM lifestyle but the Gorean scene only from on-line environments (where I witnessed things as capturing, force-collaring of slaves etc.), I wonder how in the Gorean lifestyle a slave becomes the slave of a Gorean Free Man. Wouldn't there need to be some sort of consensuality be involved or else the ownership of a slave easily meet legal borders? Believe me it is just the online uber Gorean Masters that believe in force collarings and such. The slaves I have owned, have begged of me to place a collar on them. The D/s side is seen slightly different from a Gorean perspective as well. Submission is not a gift, it is something that a Man draws forth from a female by just being himself. The female does not usually even see it as a choice, they feel compelled to act naturally and submit. There are still some discussion and disagreement, but I think I have offered the basics and general ideas. quote:
Your warning to use ones mastery to help a girl through emotional issues is a very valid one and helping a girl with issues like this should not be taken lightly at all. And I certainly did not want to imply that using mastery to help is necessarily always beneficient, but it *can* be if one knows what ones is doing. Live well, Zarath I didin't really object to what you said, just wanted to add the warning in there. I used to believe that I never failed unless I gave up, that was until I tried using my Master to help a slave with some emotional issues she was having. It ended horribly and the effects are still felt till this day. I would say that therapy combined with Mastery would work well, but I am now of the opinion that anyone that gets involved in any kind of relationship, should first get themselves taken care of. Live well, Orion
_____________________________
Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.
|