RE: my take on financial domination

RE: my take on financial domination (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Lynnxz -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/27/2008 6:51:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dollenburg It's not prostitution as long as sex isn't the ONLY thing that is exchanged for money. Wait... what? So someone could get away with prostitution, as long as they gave a blowjob AND a muffin?

colouredin -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/27/2008 7:00:19 AM)
to be fair you could go into all the neuances about the differance between prostitute and escort but it does boil down to a very similar thing. People who pay for Domination are doing so for erotic pleasure no differant from paying for a prostitue or even paying for porn, we only frown on it because we still (despite what we may thnk) are not so open minded about sexuality as some of us claim to be.

persephonee -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/27/2008 7:46:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lynnxz quote: ORIGINAL: dollenburg It's not prostitution as long as sex isn't the ONLY thing that is exchanged for money. Wait... what? So someone could get away with prostitution, as long as they gave a blowjob AND a muffin? As long as we're putting in orders, id like to exchange the fellatio for cunnilingus...and i prefer blueberry.

TheLadyConstance -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/29/2008 4:57:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl may want to reconsider that, Constance many things could be placed beneath the umbrella of BDSM, many can state its just a kink... some are saying that about ums.. yet that is illegal... just because its a kink or a fetish, doesnt mean it should have free reign... necrophilia is another kink... not supported by law or society You are aware that prostitution is not illegal everywhere, right? And also that prostitution requires that there be sexual contact between the parties? Financial domination does not always equal sex for money. You are making generalizations based on a personal bias. quote: when we all smile, and swallow what we feel is wrong, for the sake of "getting along" then we devlope into something we dont recognize anymore Someone else receiving money for domination doesn't cause me to develop into anything. It's their game, not mine. How does it affect you, I wonder?

crxmale -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/30/2008 8:53:34 AM)
To Mistress Venatrix I bid $1,000,000............but can you take an IOU??????

rick19 -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/30/2008 9:45:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl There is a great debate when it comes to the subject of Financial Domination. To some its veiwed simply as thievery( per a profile i read earlier) and/or prostitution(as read in many others). In MY opinionI believe those opinions give the submisive a way to top from the bottom.( for those that dont know what t In the true nature of submission, the submissive is required to be obidient and never question the desires of his Owner. Anytime the submissive is awarded the valuble time of a Dominant he/she should treat it as the honor it is. Gifts/tribute is only a way for a slave to show his appreciation for even being taken on as a submissive in the first place. I think what most people have the issue with is how a lot of these Financial "Dommes" present themselves. Almost every single one I have seen comes across as bitchy and has a total hatred for men in general, which I can assume will turn off many.

tazzygirl -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/30/2008 1:36:00 PM)
your original post quote: ORIGINAL: TheLadyConstance It's amazing to me that we're completely open and supportive of each other's kinks as long as they fall within a certain range. Step outside that range and we all start throwing stones. How about let's all just let our BDSM neighbors go on about their business and let's go about ours? my follow up with your comments quote: ORIGINAL: TheLadyConstance quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl may want to reconsider that, Constance many things could be placed beneath the umbrella of BDSM, many can state its just a kink... some are saying that about ums.. yet that is illegal... just because its a kink or a fetish, doesnt mean it should have free reign... necrophilia is another kink... not supported by law or society You are aware that prostitution is not illegal everywhere, right? And also that prostitution requires that there be sexual contact between the parties? Financial domination does not always equal sex for money. You are making generalizations based on a personal bias. quote: when we all smile, and swallow what we feel is wrong, for the sake of "getting along" then we devlope into something we dont recognize anymore Someone else receiving money for domination doesn't cause me to develop into anything. It's their game, not mine. How does it affect you, I wonder? you were discussing kinks... a blanket generalization... never specifying which kink or kinks you were referring too. my reply was based upon what i saw as a general statement referring to all kinks. yes, the thread is about financial domination... not prostitution. now, i have a follow up of my own.. sort of a "what if" situation if the man, or woman, who is making tributes to you, suddenly becomes broke and is financially no longer to make such tributes, do you walk away from them? if so, does that make you a domme for hire? and what would happen if the IRS obtained such information? im a curious girl ~smiles

Coupleofwhats -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/30/2008 3:27:30 PM)
My first issue with Financial Domination is generally the same problem I have with the screamy stomper dommes: it operates from a position that implies weakness or inadequacy on the part of the submissive. It also involves a lot of cajoling and such, which has never felt dominant to me. The day I have to raise my voice is the day you are dismissed. My second issue is that it often never leaves the realm of finances. You never so much as sit in the same room with these guys. I don't get where the kink is on the part of the dominant: EVERYONE likes money.

secund2nun -> RE: my take on financial domination (10/1/2008 6:26:59 PM)
Agreed! I hate the concept of financial "domination". Basically the women is just trying to take your money, and as you said she will stop seeing you if you run out of your money. I'd never do it in a million years and can't understand why someone would accept money from a stranger like that. I would feel guilty accepting it.

Dmon -> RE: my take on financial domination (12/15/2008 11:22:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl where u misunderstand my take on it and the beliefs of others..i simply feel its a stronger form of submission that only the most submissive can give A responsible Mistress/submissive relationship involving money, won't break the bank. Mistressbadgirl simply wants a sub that is truly invested in her happiness. That sub will cater to her wants and needs: physically, emotionally, financially, and always subserviently.... Mistressbadgirl isn't trying to drain a sub dry (at least I hope not), but she expects him to "want" to spend money on her. SSC means that a sub has to give consent. If a sub wants to spend money on a Domme, I say let them. If a responsible kind of financial domination helps said subbie ahcieve a greater submission, I say good for them. In the mean time I'll "playa hate from the side lines". I want free stuff too : P Still wondering what I"m doing! J

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

2.929688E-02