RE: my take on financial domination

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: my take on financial domination

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: my take on financial domination

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/27/2008 6:51:58 AM

Lynnxz

Posts: 4813
Joined: 10/3/2006
From: Atlanta
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dollenburg

It's not prostitution as long as sex isn't the ONLY thing that is exchanged for money.

Wait... what?

So someone could get away with prostitution, as long as they gave a blowjob AND a muffin?

_____________________________

HBIC

(in reply to dollenburg)

Profile

Post #: 141

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/27/2008 7:00:19 AM

colouredin

Posts: 4279
Joined: 2/2/2007
Status: offline

to be fair you could go into all the neuances about the differance between prostitute and escort but it does boil down to a very similar thing. People who pay for Domination are doing so for erotic pleasure no differant from paying for a prostitue or even paying for porn, we only frown on it because we still (despite what we may thnk) are not so open minded about sexuality as some of us claim to be.

_____________________________

Resident Lime(y) Tart
There would be no gossip without secrets
I don't want to be anything other than what I've been trying to be lately

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELvfMJoKDAk

(in reply to dollenburg)

Profile

Post #: 142

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/27/2008 7:46:56 AM

persephonee

Posts: 5089
Joined: 12/15/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lynnxz

quote:

ORIGINAL: dollenburg

It's not prostitution as long as sex isn't the ONLY thing that is exchanged for money.

Wait... what?

So someone could get away with prostitution, as long as they gave a blowjob AND a muffin?

As long as we're putting in orders, id like to exchange the fellatio for cunnilingus...and i prefer blueberry.

_____________________________

You be the Captain; i'll be no one.

And You can carry me away....if You want to. ~Kasey Chambers

E*Whore, extraordinaire....

Nothing is exactly as it seems~Nor, is it otherwise.

(in reply to Lynnxz)

Profile

Post #: 143

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/29/2008 4:57:50 AM

TheLadyConstance

Posts: 40
Joined: 8/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
may want to reconsider that, Constance

many things could be placed beneath the umbrella of BDSM, many can state its just a kink... some are saying that about ums.. yet that is illegal... just because its a kink or a fetish, doesnt mean it should have free reign... necrophilia is another kink... not supported by law or society

You are aware that prostitution is not illegal everywhere, right? And also that prostitution requires that there be sexual contact between the parties? Financial domination does not always equal sex for money. You are making generalizations based on a personal bias.

quote:

when we all smile, and swallow what we feel is wrong, for the sake of "getting along" then we devlope into something we dont recognize anymore

Someone else receiving money for domination doesn't cause me to develop into anything. It's their game, not mine. How does it affect you, I wonder?

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 144

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/30/2008 8:53:34 AM

crxmale

Posts: 55
Joined: 9/23/2006
Status: offline

To Mistress Venatrix

I bid $1,000,000............but can you take an IOU??????

(in reply to Venatrix)

Profile

Post #: 145

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/30/2008 9:45:57 AM

rick19

Posts: 98
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl

There is a great debate when it comes to the subject of Financial Domination. To some its veiwed simply as thievery( per a profile i read earlier) and/or prostitution(as read in many others). In MY opinionI believe those opinions give the submisive a way to top from the bottom.( for those that dont know what t In the true nature of submission, the submissive is required to be obidient and never question the desires of his Owner. Anytime the submissive is awarded the valuble time of a Dominant he/she should treat it as the honor it is. Gifts/tribute is only a way for a slave to show his appreciation for even being taken on as a submissive in the first place.

I think what most people have the issue with is how a lot of these Financial "Dommes" present themselves. Almost every single one I have seen comes across as bitchy and has a total hatred for men in general, which I can assume will turn off many.

(in reply to mistressbadgirl)

Profile

Post #: 146

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/30/2008 1:36:00 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

your original post

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLadyConstance

It's amazing to me that we're completely open and supportive of each other's kinks as long as they fall within a certain range. Step outside that range and we all start throwing stones.
How about let's all just let our BDSM neighbors go on about their business and let's go about ours?

my follow up with your comments

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLadyConstance

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
may want to reconsider that, Constance

many things could be placed beneath the umbrella of BDSM, many can state its just a kink... some are saying that about ums.. yet that is illegal... just because its a kink or a fetish, doesnt mean it should have free reign... necrophilia is another kink... not supported by law or society

You are aware that prostitution is not illegal everywhere, right? And also that prostitution requires that there be sexual contact between the parties? Financial domination does not always equal sex for money. You are making generalizations based on a personal bias.

quote:

when we all smile, and swallow what we feel is wrong, for the sake of "getting along" then we devlope into something we dont recognize anymore

Someone else receiving money for domination doesn't cause me to develop into anything. It's their game, not mine. How does it affect you, I wonder?

you were discussing kinks... a blanket generalization... never specifying which kink or kinks you were referring too. my reply was based upon what i saw as a general statement referring to all kinks. yes, the thread is about financial domination... not prostitution.

now, i have a follow up of my own.. sort of a "what if" situation

if the man, or woman, who is making tributes to you, suddenly becomes broke and is financially no longer to make such tributes, do you walk away from them?

if so, does that make you a domme for hire? and what would happen if the IRS obtained such information?

im a curious girl

~smiles

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheLadyConstance)

Profile

Post #: 147

RE: my take on financial domination - 9/30/2008 3:27:30 PM

Coupleofwhats

Posts: 280
Joined: 6/4/2008
Status: offline

My first issue with Financial Domination is generally the same problem I have with the screamy stomper dommes: it operates from a position that implies weakness or inadequacy on the part of the submissive. It also involves a lot of cajoling and such, which has never felt dominant to me. The day I have to raise my voice is the day you are dismissed.

My second issue is that it often never leaves the realm of finances. You never so much as sit in the same room with these guys. I don't get where the kink is on the part of the dominant: EVERYONE likes money.

_____________________________

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fm6JgZ35w8w

(in reply to zakkan)

Profile

Post #: 148

RE: my take on financial domination - 10/1/2008 6:26:59 PM

secund2nun

Posts: 1
Joined: 10/30/2007
Status: offline

Agreed! I hate the concept of financial "domination". Basically the women is just trying to take your money, and as you said she will stop seeing you if you run out of your money. I'd never do it in a million years and can't understand why someone would accept money from a stranger like that. I would feel guilty accepting it.

(in reply to DomDolf)

Profile

Post #: 149

RE: my take on financial domination - 12/15/2008 11:22:33 AM

Dmon

Posts: 82
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl

where u misunderstand my take on it and the beliefs of others..i simply feel its a stronger form of submission that only the most submissive can give

A responsible Mistress/submissive relationship involving money, won't break the bank. Mistressbadgirl simply wants a sub that is truly invested in her happiness. That sub will cater to her wants and needs: physically, emotionally, financially, and always subserviently.... Mistressbadgirl isn't trying to drain a sub dry (at least I hope not), but she expects him to "want" to spend money on her.

SSC means that a sub has to give consent. If a sub wants to spend money on a Domme, I say let them. If a responsible kind of financial domination helps said subbie ahcieve a greater submission, I say good for them.

In the mean time I'll "playa hate from the side lines". I want free stuff too : P

Still wondering what I"m doing!

J

_____________________________

Wondering what I'm doing... Always.

Joker AKA. Mr. J

(in reply to mistressbadgirl)

Profile

Post #: 150