CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3650
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
Actually, after 30 years of poly participation, it seems to me that what it takes to hold a poly household together is really -flexible- human beings, who genuinely want to be with one another. Poly is like any other relationship -- sometimes, it just isn't pretty. In fact, sometimes, it's pretty damned messed up... and unlike dyadic relationships, there is no 'mess' that can be mutually ignored or conveniently closeted, because things that aren't resolved seem to get dug up and re-exposed over and over again when you're in a greater-than-dyadic group. The household I'm in currently started out without D/s in the mix. What held it together through the rough spots wasn't some domineering individual with buttloads of rules. In the previous poly situations I was in, there was -never- a D/s dynamic involved, and the same thing held those together... the fact that the people in the relationship wanted to be there, and were -all- committed to doing what it took to keep the relationship healthy and strong. I've been fortunate, in some ways. I've never had a poly relationship 'decay'. The ones that have ended have ended because of external demands (jobs that meant people moving in different directions, death, etc.), and they ended with affection and respect for one another still intact. I think that the reason this is the case is because beyond anything else, the people -in- the relationship have wanted to be there, and have wanted to share themselves with the other folks to whom they were connected--enough so that they made the household a commitment, not because it was -compelled- that they did so, but because they -wanted- things to work. You can't compel a relationship into being. You can't compel a household into staying together. You can order someone to do something or be somewhere, and they may obey, but a command or a rule won't make them -want- that thing (or want to participate in a healthy way in that thing). The thing that holds it together is the desire of the members for it to be what it is. That's true whether you're talking about a poly household or a dyad, a family-of-choice or a family-by-blood. Trying to make it a big old ego-stroke, and taking away the communal responsibility for the health of the household won't -protect- that household... it will weaken the foundations that would hold it in place when things get rocky. If everyone involved does not believe that xhe is vested in the health and well-being of the relationship, xhe will have no incentive to work towards resolution. Rules won't provide a foundation for a healthy poly home. Honest affection, time, committment, and active, mutual problem-solving and crisis resolution are the only things that will work over time.
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|