Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/21/2008 12:47:27 PM   
Nyxmyst


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
I've claimed a lot of things in my day... truthfulness being amoung them. However, I never said I was honorable.. not by most definitions. Granted, I have my own code.. but it's rather unique.

I normally wouldn't have posted because it's just not something I do. Then again, I haven't bothered posting to anything of late. There's been little of interest and too much havoc in my own life.

If I'd instead said "A man named Michael who none of you know because he doesn't post here asked me to post" would it have made any real difference? Not that I'm saying that, of course. After all, I have an anonymous man, right?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/21/2008 2:05:54 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
No it would not have made any difference that a male named Michael asked that you be disrespectful and not honor the request of the OP. The only thing that matters is that you did not honor the request of the OP. On Collarchat you can post anywhere, within guidelines, but Goreans usually have a more strict code that we follow.

_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/21/2008 2:15:04 PM   
Nyxmyst


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

No it would not have made any difference that a male named Michael asked that you be disrespectful and not honor the request of the OP. The only thing that matters is that you did not honor the request of the OP. On Collarchat you can post anywhere, within guidelines, but Goreans usually have a more strict code that we follow.


She's a submissive female, that makes it a request.. not an order. True, I didn't respect it. I'm not required to.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/21/2008 3:33:36 PM   
MarcusofAr


Posts: 532
Joined: 3/12/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcusofAr

Ideally, the two states are constantly in effect, reinforcing one another, all the time. That would be total slavery.



The external is not necessary.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

Or the slave is arrogant and self-righteous due to a lack of effective discipline.


Which comes from where?

The external often IS necessary, obviously.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

Slavery does exist both on this earth and in the United States to who practice it, and who not only practice but are not in denial about it. There are many groups in the United States that do so and still do not get jailed.


That would depend upon one's definition of "slavery."

Illegal slavery IS practiced in the industrial west.

But voluntary (or consensual) slavery does not qualify as slavery under the law. Hence my above statement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

I equate this to taking an oath for example regarding the U.S. Constitution for the Gorean state of inequality contradicts the equality aspects of the constitution. Or are we really all equal?


Theoretically all American citizens are "equal" under the law, which is the only area to which the U.S. Consitution applies.

IWYW

_Marcus_




(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/23/2008 8:48:47 PM   
Unbuilder


Posts: 131
Joined: 7/8/2007
From: Alaska
Status: offline
Greetings Kirata
  Just for the record, I am the father of 4 daughters, who are now… 33. 31. and 25 (when they started coming in pairs… I quit trying for a son).  None of them were raised to be slaves, or to surrender self determination to *anyone*, and that includes me.  There is a fundamental difference between someone who presents themselves as a slave, and someone who is ready, willing and able to accept the accountability that accompanies the status of a free person. I have a free companion, several other men in my community have free companions, all *by choice*, and there are two females who are citizens.  While I can only speak definitively for myself, I have a pretty good reason to believe that those other men in my community are not heartbroken cause they *didn’t* get a slave
. Considering that Tarl/Bosk was on the periphery of Gorean society by virtue of the fact that he hadn’t contributed to the gene pool, hell, he spent a good deal of his time taking females who exhibited “party girl” tendencies out of the gene pool, I find it difficult to believe that the musing/mutterings of such a man could be taken seriously by anyone who wished to be anything other than a pimp.
  It strikes me that the notion that “all women are basically slaves” is a conceit that is dear to the narcissisms’ of some men, who wish they had the gonads to make it real. Course, there is a downside to that too, when my oldest was 10, the 11 year old boy across the street tried the “I can do what I want with girls” till she jacked him up with her knee… to the point that his mother and aunt came to me with concerns that he might never father children of his own….  stupidity shouldn’t be hereditary. I gave her a hug, and him a shrug.
  Perhaps you don’t have daughters, or a free companion.  Perhaps, you don’t have any children, or, perhaps you don’t give a shit what happens to them, if you do.  I don’t know and quite frankly, I don’t care to know.    To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing in Norman’s life to suggest that he would agree with your assessment that “all women are slaves, some are still waiting for their master”.  There are numerous places in the books where Norman extols Free Women, and their place within Gorean society.  If a person is gonna ignore all of that, they might just as well ignore all the talk about pirates, warriors, slavers and super heroic encounters where the hero manages to survive a swordfight with 30 some enemy swordsmen intent on sending him to the cities of dust.
  Be well, Kirata
Unbuilder

< Message edited by Unbuilder -- 12/23/2008 8:52:01 PM >


_____________________________

In an endless universe, lie infinite opportunities, *anything is possible.
I am the man that I have chosen to become, for better or worse, the credit is mine, as well as the blame.
Objectivity should be a tool with two edges, one for you, one for me.

(in reply to MarcusofAr)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/23/2008 9:49:06 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Tal Unbuilder,

Could you explain more how what you have written her correlates to Gorean Philosophy? How does biological instincts play into this? You seem to make it out that all Free always take accountability, and are infalliable, but that is not the case with humans.

In your opinion, what is the difference between slave and Free Woman, in how they go about their daily lives, when the Men are not about?

Live well,
Orion

_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Unbuilder)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/24/2008 12:27:12 AM   
MarcusofAr


Posts: 532
Joined: 3/12/2008
Status: offline
Tal, Unbuilder.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Unbuilder

It strikes me that the notion that “all women are basically slaves” is a conceit that is dear to the narcissisms’ of some men, who wish they had the gonads to make it real.



Context, Unbuilder.

All women are basically slaves, if one views the situation in a certain context.

Meaning: all women are subject, in some way or form, to the will of men.

Because in a patriarchal society wherein 90% of the means and tools of physical enforcement are held by male hands, that's simply a statement of fact.

Politically correct? Absolutely not. But then, that's not a game I choose to play, as a general rule. Fuck political correctness. Nor am I overly concerned with massaging the egos of those who choose to assign themselves qualities which may not be supported by the facts.

Norman tells us that Goreans believe, rather generally, in the above (rather simplistic) concept-- but that even among the Goreans, these matters are considered far more complex than can be embodied by such a simple statement.

So, in the correct context, it's true, and has a solid basis in historical fact.

It's only when one begins to debate the definition of the word "slave" that social pigeon-holes appear and individual personality traits become relevant.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Unbuilder

...there is nothing in Norman’s life to suggest that he would agree with your assessment that “all women are slaves, some are still waiting for their master”. 


Except for the fact that he says almost exactly those same words many times in the Gor series, in the context I've presented above.

I suspect Kirata is speaking in generalities, whereas you are defending the Gorean social construct of the Free Woman.

Free Women are still women. They are therefore subject to the same patriarchal social overlay as are their imbonded counterparts, though they function within that system in a different manner.

One might not like patriarchy, certainly. One might take a stand against it, or denounce it as pure evil, or whatever (not that I think you are doing that, Unbuilder-- but some might).

That's all well and good. Each to his or her own.

But one cannot ignore it. Or at least, it seems rather intellectually dishonest to do so.

Just a point I feel worth considering.

Context DOES matter. Always.

I wish you well!

_Marcus_



(in reply to Unbuilder)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/24/2008 4:15:56 PM   
Unbuilder


Posts: 131
Joined: 7/8/2007
From: Alaska
Status: offline
Tal Marcus

I'm theorizing and attempting to push the envelope some... seeking to extrapolate on what the books give us, and it seems not doing a very good job of it. I reckon what I need to do is take a few days to think this all thru and do a better job of explaining my thoughts.

I wish you well

Un


_____________________________

In an endless universe, lie infinite opportunities, *anything is possible.
I am the man that I have chosen to become, for better or worse, the credit is mine, as well as the blame.
Objectivity should be a tool with two edges, one for you, one for me.

(in reply to MarcusofAr)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 12/24/2008 7:45:53 PM   
MarcusofAr


Posts: 532
Joined: 3/12/2008
Status: offline
Tal, Unbuilder!

Understood. And no one is more determined to eradicate certain sweeping generalizations, when they appear, as am I. So I think I do understand your point.

I wish you well!

_Marcus_





< Message edited by MarcusofAr -- 12/24/2008 7:47:00 PM >

(in reply to Unbuilder)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/1/2009 2:05:23 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6909
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

She's a submissive female, that makes it a request.. not an order. True, I didn't respect it. I'm not required to.


What you have just done to common courtesy, a slave swearing an oath does to what the oath stands for. You are indeed not required to respect anyone, and can piss on a thread where the opinions of free men have been sought. I have no idea what purpose will be served by doing so, however, nor whose respect you hope to gain or retain by your posting and subsequent commentary. It couldn't have been mine, and it seems unlikely to be that of anyone else here.

No matter. It's "good enough for government work," I guess.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/1/2009 4:25:51 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6909
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: online
Tal, Marcus!

Glad we agree about the nonverbal aspect.

For an external party to require an oath, is for it to set forth a very serious requirement, and to give it freely is a solemn undertaking. As an example, I have long wanted to study a particular koryu art, yet refrained from doing so due to reservations about the terms of the keppan (blood oath) required to sign up legitimately. Of course, there are conditions under which one may argue that an oath can be falsely undertaken (one imagines the Assassins would do so on occasion, as do undercover agents in our own world), but it is inarguable, IMO, that such a thing is not acting in good faith. As such, I have a hard time finding any justified reason for someone to do so when not done as a part of dealing with an enemy.

When being a doctor requires swearing by the Hippocratic Oath (which nowadays should be renamed the Hypocritic's Oath, IMNSHO), as it does in most places, it is hard to argue that it is not deceitful to allow one's slave to keep practicing as a doctor, which proceeds under the assumption that such an oath is valid, freely given and the principal governing code of professional conduct. Clearly, if it is, then said "slave" is being dishonest about something else. And if it is not, then their master is sanctioning the deceit, which is hardly exhibiting respect for the home stone. One could argue that it is valid by the standards of those who expect the oath, but that seems too much like crossing the line into rationalizations for my taste. Things based in law and definition, that's different, but that's not what was discussed, methinks.

I've no idea how it works over there, but around these parts, a partnership ("marriage" is a colloquial term for a heterosexual partnership, pretty much) is a matter of two people signing a document, paying the processing fee, and updating their tax records to reflect their legal union. The suggestion that multiple people should be able to enter the same partnership has been forwarded, but not yet passed, though it undoubtedly will at some point. Either way, it doesn't require an oath to be undertaken. As such, there's the orderly dissolution of a contract instead of a violation of vows when a divorce occurs here. Now, I well understand that a man can fail. And that is what divorce amounts to, if an oath was undertaken: failing to uphold an oath, thus breaking it. Which is a serious matter that will probably have some immediate consequences, along with a number of consequences, not the least of which will be living with having broken an oath.

As you point out, there are times when two oaths may come into conflict, with no resolution that satisfies both. It's a difficult and serious occasion, that some cultures have resolved by suicide, while other cultures have favored a compromise of least infidelity, and still others favor retaining absolute fidelity to one of the oaths (as I understand, that's the option you chose). When one is aware that such a conflict may be on the horizon, such as is the case when a slave is in some profession that requires an oath to take precedence over her other concerns, it seems the obvious resolution to resign from that job (or to discuss the matter with the workplace after a disclosure of the potential conflict and the likely outcome of such a conflict).

I'm not sure that I see a disagreement here.

This would seem to be just another one of those cases where being truthful with oneself requires sacrificing comfort (i.e. having the slave resign her job), or recognizing an incompatibility of status (i.e. freeing said slave) or values (i.e. picking another way through life than this one). It wouldn't be the first time our outlook on life was somehow in conflict with the general outlook of our environs, yet most here still retain loyalty to their city, so some resolution is needed to avoid a compromise of one of the two.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to MarcusofAr)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/1/2009 5:04:38 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6909
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: online
Tal, Orion.

I wouldn't presume to answer for Unbuilder.

My own take on your questions, if you're interested, is this:

It's a choice. That's the most important similarity between what Lange set forth and what Rand set forth. The idea that it is incumbent on us to realize our full potential as humans, which includes building on some facilities that are not present in the same combination in other animals. Beavers build dams. Women and children build language and social units. Men build societies, structures and technology. And all can strive to realize their potential fully, if they so choose. If not, then the full realization of their "animal" (I am not familiar with a word that accurately conveys my meaning, so I hope the quotes make it clearer; it is definitely not an assertion that we are not animals, which we are, though a particular kind) natures is as simple as a heroin patch and robot-grown crops of nutrients/food.

Of course, inherent in the distinction between full realization of the "animal" nature and full realization of potential, is the question of direction and values, which makes their realization a priority for those who are aware of them in the necessary sense. For others, it would be adherence to those passed to them, which are ideally ones that are in tune with their instincts; hence, we have the first knowledge, n'est-ce pas?

The books do not make a distinction along the lines that Rand would have emphasized if she were writing the (otherwise) exact same thing, but rather deal with the intergender dominance trends to some extent, and Lange's rabid crusade (if you have any reservations about my description, you may find some recorded interviews to be interested viewing- this is not a man acting from a place of reason and facts... writing well about instincts isn't always easy when dominated by one, I guess). However, there is a distinction there, and some confuse a lot of distinct axes. Choice versus circumstance. Circumstance versus law. Dominance versus submission. And, finally, of course, the liberation from repression, the need for which is a distinctly male specialty these days, from what I can tell. You may find that both Goodkind (whose philosophy is based on Rand) and Rigney (whose philosophy is based on a lifetime of living with a keen eye to the world, and exposure to a wide range of reading) elucidate these topics in a manner that is far closer to biological truth than what Lange manages to convey.

As for how a slave lives when no Free are around, that's just rephrasing a Zen question.

Health,
al-Aswad.

_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 1:33:06 PM   
Nyxmyst


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
“I have a free companion, several other men in my community have free companions, all *by choice*, and there are two females who are citizens.”

No. These citizens you speak of are married and this does not qualify as free companionship within the Gorean way. Why? Marriage contradicts what a Gorean free companionship is on most if not all of the fundamental s. You are right about “by choice” because these people you speak of remain married by choice and have not converted their relationship to an actual Gorean free companionship. I like you know who these people are.

“It strikes me that the notion that “all women are basically slaves” is a conceit that is dear to the narcissisms’ of some men, who wish they had the gonads to make it real.”

Players of Gor Page 13:
"Make my maidens slaves," she said, "they are good for little else. But I am a free woman!" "Do you think you are better than they?" asked Samos. "Yes," she said. "You are no different from them," he said. "You, too are only a female."

You are right, it does take gonads.

“The external is not necessary. Ownership, when accepted and recognized, is an internal dynamic.”
“The external often IS necessary, obviously.”

Which one?

Norman tells us on this subject:
Fighting Slave of Gor Page 301:
“Woman is born to the collar and love", said Tenalion.  You have put her in a collar. And she must now, helplessly, seek the other"


...and subservient no matter what.

(in reply to Unbuilder)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 2:09:43 PM   
Camerius


Posts: 742
Joined: 9/5/2006
Status: offline

And yet, nowhere in the books does it EXCLUDE being Gorean and married to your Free Companion.
As Free Companion is just a Gorean solution to what we have here on Earth by what we call marriage. Both are identical, the solution ( as said ) is just different.

I, personally, fail to see any contradiction on this behalf either by being married to an FC or that excluding you from being Gorean by being so.

Nice try tho, but no cigar.

I wish you well,

  Camerius


_____________________________

"To Gorean morality many Earth moralities might ask, "Why so hard?" To these Earth moralities, the Gorean ethos might ask, "Why so soft?" Marauders of Gor, pg.8

(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 4:30:59 PM   
MarcusofAr


Posts: 532
Joined: 3/12/2008
Status: offline

Tal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

These citizens you speak of are married and this does not qualify as free companionship within the Gorean way. Why? Marriage contradicts what a Gorean free companionship is on most if not all of the fundamentals."


And which fundamentals would those be?

I would think that whether or not that were true would depend upon the internal workings of the marriage being discussed; despite the fact that the institution of marriage makes all (or most) such relationships equivalent under the law (for the most part, any way-- legalities vary among different jurisdictions), the obvious truth is that, WITHIN the basic legal structure dictated by law in order for one to have a legal marriage, there are as many different variations as can be imagined.

The argument that "since there is no marriage on Gor, no Gorean can be married on Earth and still be Gorean" is equivalent to the similar argument that "since there are no cars on Gor, no Gorean can drive a car on Earth and still be Gorean."

Marriage as it exists in western culture is primarily a legal agreement wherein a pair of people are legally recognized by the state as being in a formal union-- its spiritual or religious connotations are both variable and completely optional. Legal marriage is by any definition a fairly flexible institution. The fact that there is a growing social movement demanding that its parameters be expanded to include homosexual partnerships beneath its aegis is ample proof of that.

Some such unions might be entirely at odds with the particulars of Gorean Philosophy, but they need not be. In fact, most aren't. Within the institution of marriage, many different types of relationship are possible.

In recent posts, you yourself have commented upon the fact that there are some cultural examples of actual slavery in existence, flying under the radar of western society in certain religious and familial groupings; in such cases, often, the married female is (although "legally"married), for all intents and purposes, a slave. Thus, obviously marriage in that context can include slavery, which some might argue is completely anti-Gorean in all aspects, since "a slave cannot hold property" or whatever else.

But the overall legalities often have little to do with what happens WITHIN the relationship, as you yourself have previously implied.

What does Norman have to say about it?

quote:

"There is no marriage, as we know it, on Gor, but there is the institution of the Free Companionship, which is its nearest correspondent."

--Outlaw of Gor


He also tells us:

quote:

"A Gorean free woman does not change her name in the ceremony of the Free Companionship. She remains who she was. In such a ceremony two free individuals have elected to become companions. The Earth woman, as a consequence of certain mating ceremonials, may change her last name. The first and other names, however, tend to remain constant."

--Explorers of Gor


Married women upon Earth are not required to legally change their surnames, though many do, taking the male "gens" surname (as Norman discusses in Magicians of Gor). Most married women on Earth do NOT change their first name, though-- such would be considered by many to be unthinkable. Which it typically would be, to a Free Gorean.

Since many Goreans of low caste have only one given name, attached via a connector to the name of their father (usually with the identifier "ho," meaning "son of," yet such individuals can and do enter into the Free Companionship, the point becomes somewhat moot.

The main factors which identify Gorean Free Companionship seem to be based upon the simple fact that it is a contractual relationship entered into by Free Goreans. Among those of immense wealth or High Caste, a dowry or bride-price is often involved (as it was in the past, in many Earth cultures) but that doesn't seem to be a requirement. Especially in the case of recently-freed slaves, who would have no material property at all:

quote:

"I noted that the girls who had been once their slaves, captured enemies, now wore no longer their collars of gold, but instead stood at their sides as Free Companions."

--Assassin of Gor


Too, though Gorean Free Companionships (like Earth marriages) are sometimes contracted between families, the Gorean Free Companionship can also be entered into freely at the wish of the female involved, as is the case in most modern Western marriages:

quote:

"Surprisingly enough, a woman who is bought from her parents, for tarns or gold, is regarded as a Free Companion, even though she may not have been consulted in the transaction. More commendably, a free woman may herself, of her own free will, agree to be such a companion."

--Outlaw of Gor

Thurnus stood up again. "I ask this free woman," said he, indicating Sandal Thong, "for whom I muchly care, to accept me in free companionship."
There was a great cry of pleasure from the villagers.
"But Thurnus," said she, "as I am now free do I not have the right to refuse?"
"True," said Thurnus puzzled.
"Then, noble Thurnus," said she, evenly, calmly, "I do refuse. I will not be your companion."

--Slave Girl of Gor

"Drink with me the cup of the Free Companionship," said Relius, rather sternly.
"Yes, Master," said Virginia, "yes!"
"Relius," said he.
"I love you!" she cried. "I love you, Relius!"
"Bring the wine of Free Companionship!" decreed Marlenus.
The wine was brought and Relius and Virginia, lost in one another’s eyes, arms interlocked, drank together.

--Assassin of Gor


Free Companionship is formally celebrated by having the two parties interlink their arms to drink wine, as is often done in Western Earth marriages. There are many various rituals involved with the wearing of, and ritual lifting of, veils worn by the female (as also exist in marriage ceremonies on Earth); and the companioned females often wear flowers in their hair, again as it is often done in Earth marriage ceremonies:

quote:

In certain cities, in connection with the free companionship, the betrothed or pledged beauty may wear eight veils, several of which are ritualistically removed during various phases of the ceremony of companionship; the final veils, and robes, of course, are removed in private by the male who, following their removal, arms interlocked with the girl, drinks with her the wine of the companionship, after which he completes the ceremony. This sort of thing, however, varies considerably from city to city. In some cities the girl is unveiled, though not disrobed, of course, during the public ceremony. The friends of the male may then express their pleasure and joy in her beauty, and their celebration of the good fortune of their friend.

--Slave Girl of Gor

A crown of talenders was often worn by the girl at the feast celebrating her Free Companionship.

--Outlaw of Gor


Gorean Free Companionship seems to require only the following: that the two parties who enter into it are legally free, that they interlink their arms and drink wine at the companionship ceremony, that they formally agree to repeat that action every year on their anniversary and decide at that time whether or not to continue the relationship or end it, and that during the course of that relationship both parties remain free-- legal enslavement ends the companionship immediately.

Marriage isn't always like that on Earth-- but it can be. And if it is, I see no reason why an Earth marriage can't be functionally and practically identical to a Gorean Free Companionship. After all, the particulars of an Earth marriage are mostly dependent upon the wishes of the married parties. Though technically, it might be more accurate to say that a Gorean Free Companionship can exist WITHIN a legal marriage, according to the philosophical wishes of those involved.

Further, if one doesn't live in a joint-property state (in the U.S, anyway) then the two parties maintain ownership of all of their property individually. Though one might want to look into that, if one were considering entering into a Gorean Free companionship within a marriage.

Frankly, Norman uses the Gorean Free Companionship as an analogy for Earth marriage so often in the Gor books that it is pretty obvious that the two relationships bear striking similarity. The greatest departure between the two being the fact that a Free Companionship lapses if not renewed, whereas a marriage does not. Unless those involved decides that it does.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

“The external is not necessary. Ownership, when accepted and recognized, is an internal dynamic.”
“The external often IS necessary, obviously.”

Which one?


The external IS often a necessary requirement.

If a woman is naturally a slave, but falls under the command of a weak master, and decides that she is therefore NOT a slave... is that not an example of the missing "external" component (in that case, an excellent Mastery)?

If she decides that she must be a Free Woman, therefore... but later meets an excellent Master and realizes that she was mistaken-- and that she IS actually a natural slave, but could only learn it at the feet of masterful male-- is that not equally an example of the necessary external component completing her internal process?

Gorean M/s is about the relationship between the Master and the slave. Without the presence and input of the other, each is an incomplete part of the equation. One cannot be a slave to oneself-- the impetus comes from the relationship, and the relationship must come from somewhere outside of herself.

IWYW

_Marcus_



(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 4:46:40 PM   
Nyxmyst


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
“And yet, nowhere in the books does it EXCLUDE being Gorean and married to your Free Companion.”

It is excluded by way of the fundamental beliefs of being Gorean and what a Gorean Free Companionship is verse what Marriage is.

“As Free Companion is just a Gorean solution to what we have here on Earth by what we call marriage. Both are identical, the solution ( as said ) is just different.”

Both are not identical.

Marriage is not renewed yearly as a Gorean Free Companionship is. You can have a yearly renewable contract between Free Companions that can be crafted to suit even in today’s world. You may say we have “renewed” when renewing vows, the lack of renewal of vows does not terminate a marriage. The lack of renewal of the Free Companionship does terminate companionship. Unlike Free Companionship Marriage demands certain property divisions which are different. In Marriage the spouses are considered equal unlike in a Free Companionship when the Man is to be in charge.  In Marriage either spouse is responsible to each other-especially their when debt is involved unlike a Free Companionship.

“Nice try tho, but no cigar.”

I wonder sometimes if anyone has ever actually read the books.

(in reply to Camerius)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 5:01:40 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7329
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

“And yet, nowhere in the books does it EXCLUDE being Gorean and married to your Free Companion.”

It is excluded by way of the fundamental beliefs of being Gorean and what a Gorean Free Companionship is verse what Marriage is.

“As Free Companion is just a Gorean solution to what we have here on Earth by what we call marriage. Both are identical, the solution ( as said ) is just different.”

Both are not identical.


I agree they are not identical, but they are similar.

quote:


Marriage is not renewed yearly as a Gorean Free Companionship is.


Who says that it is not renewed each year? If two are married, and on their anniversary address whether to continue or not, is that not a renewal?

quote:


You can have a yearly renewable contract between Free Companions that can be crafted to suit even in today’s world.


What about the division of property? Should that be addressed every year? You keep saying contract, but could you show me how the legalities of a FC contract would be applied to the legal system in the US or similar?

quote:


You may say we have “renewed” when renewing vows, the lack of renewal of vows does not terminate a marriage. The lack of renewal of the Free Companionship does terminate companionship. Unlike Free Companionship Marriage demands certain property divisions which are different. In Marriage the spouses are considered equal unlike in a Free Companionship when the Man is to be in charge.  In Marriage either spouse is responsible to each other-especially their when debt is involved unlike a Free Companionship.


The actual renewal can be verbal, upon the anniversary. Why can this not be used? Free Companionship does not demand property division? So who owns what during the FC contract? What of those things purchased together? Actually in marriage they are not consider equal, but have joint ownership.

quote:


“Nice try tho, but no cigar.”

I wonder sometimes if anyone has ever actually read the books.



Pretty fucking condescending words to use there. Are you sure this is the tact you wish to take?

I wonder sometimes if some people can separate reality from fantasy, as well as custom from philosophy.


Orion

_____________________________

Die die glauben fordern keinen Beweis. Denen die zweifeln genuegt kein Beweis.


(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 5:12:02 PM   
Camerius


Posts: 742
Joined: 9/5/2006
Status: offline

No, Nyxmyst, it's ONLY excluded by the PERSON that holds that belief of it being against Gorean Free Companionship, nothing else. You seem to see it that way, I on the other hand don't.

Why? Because it's the SAME thing, it's a form of marriage, again, the solution for it is different. Marcus has already pointed out and in length gone into why there is this difference between a Gorean Free Companionship and a Earthly marrige arrangment and too what it's based on. But in the end it is the same, the solution chosen is as I wrote different but the meaning and intent is the same, so is the reasoning behind it.

Again, I fail to see where it excludes someone from being Gorean and married to your Free Companion. And I still maintain that they ARE the SAME, whether you agree or not, since we have it from John Norman's own hand, and which have been cited by Marcus above this post.

Yes, marriage CAN mean that and embrace/include that which you mention, but it too can do so with a lot of other things you haven't mentioned or included. And such, yes, it does include being married to your Free Companion or a slave for that matter. Sometimes it even includes nothing at all to be married besides that you happen to love some one very deeply and let that count for all. Again, doing this does NOT exclude someone from being Gorean.


As to me having read the books, well, I'll that statement stand on it's own.


Nice try, once more, but no cigar.


I wish you well,

  Camerius







_____________________________

"To Gorean morality many Earth moralities might ask, "Why so hard?" To these Earth moralities, the Gorean ethos might ask, "Why so soft?" Marauders of Gor, pg.8

(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 5:36:08 PM   
MarcusofAr


Posts: 532
Joined: 3/12/2008
Status: offline

Tal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nyxmyst

It is excluded by way of the fundamental beliefs of being Gorean and what a Gorean Free Companionship is verse what Marriage is.


"What marriage is"?

According to who?

Marriage is a legal contract of familial partnership, recognized by a society as being such, between two individuals.

So is a Gorean Free Companionship.

One can speak of "fundamental beliefs" all day long regarding what marriage is or isn't, but those vary widely.

Some people have "open" marriages. Some marry in name only, and don't even live together. Some include polyamory within their marriages. And so on.

Sure, someone could have a lawyer draw up a legal contract between two individuals regarding property division and the like. It might be called a "Free Companionship." Or it might equally be called a "pre-nuptial agreement."

But it WOULDN'T fulfill one major requirement of Gorean Free Companionship-- it wouldn't be accepted by Earth society as being a bond of familial partnership between a committed couple. In Earth society, that role is filled primarily by marriage.

So, in the best of both worlds, a philosophically committed Gorean would want to have both-- a socially and legally recognized marriage, with a Free Companionship within it.

If that is the case, then one should simply do that.

The argument that Earth law bestows legal rights upon the married spouse which would not exist upon Gor is no different than the argument that Earth society bestows legal rights upon the female slave which she would not have upon Gor. And both may well be true.

Whether or not one exercises those rights, however, is another matter. And an important one.

Just because a marriage does not automatically legally end if it is not re-pledged each year on the anniversary doesn't mean that it might not voluntarily be ENDED if not formally re-pledged, with the divorce being a mere formality. So if that's the totality of your argument against Free Companionship within marriage, I must say I disagree.

Since none of us currently live under Gorean law, we have no choice but to function under Earth legalities, some of which make different provisions than would exist upon Gor.

So, we adapt. Whether it is adaptation to support consensual Gorean slavery, or in support of a Gorean Free Companionship.

Same argument, either way.

IWYW

_Marcus_


(in reply to Nyxmyst)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please - 1/3/2009 6:27:10 PM   
Nyxmyst


Posts: 58
Joined: 5/22/2004
Status: offline
“And which fundamentals would those be?”

Some of those fundamentals are answered in my response to Camerius and out of not wanting to be redundant I will not repeat them.

“I would think that whether or not that were true would depend upon the internal workings of the marriage being discussed; despite the fact that the institution of marriage makes all (or most) such relationships equivalent under the law (for the most part, any way-- legalities vary among different jurisdictions), the obvious truth is that, WITHIN the basic legal structure dictated by law in order for one to have a legal marriage, there are as many different variations as can be imagined.”

Each marriage is just that a marriage no matter what the internal workings are. You state the law makes it so because it is endowed by the law. The jurisdiction does not matter since each marriage is recognized by each place as a marriage even if you marry outside where you originally were married.

“The argument that "since there is no marriage on Gor, no Gorean can be married on Earth and still be Gorean" is equivalent to the similar argument that "since there are no cars on Gor, no Gorean can drive a car on Earth and still be Gorean."

This falters and is self subscribed since free companionship is a defined relationship and is quite clear. I have mentioned some of the differences already. If you are married you and do not follow the ways that are Gor then how can you be Gorean?

“Marriage as it exists in western culture is primarily a legal agreement wherein a pair of people are legally recognized by the state as being in a formal union-- its spiritual or religious connotations are both variable and completely optional. Legal marriage is by any definition a fairly flexible institution. The fact that there is a growing social movement demanding that its parameters be expanded to include homosexual partnerships beneath its aegis is ample proof of that.”

Marriage is both a legal and a religious institution. Marriage was in the world before the formal law existed. This also begs the question in what religion were the people were married in? Does that religion contradict Gor?

Marriage is not as flexible as you are making it out to be. You are literally tied to the other spouse unlike Free Companionship. You in marriage must abide by the various martial laws which in my response to Camerius contradict most of the fundamentals of Free Companionship. A good example of this is the yearly renewable aspect of Free Companionship and the lack of that in Marriage.

“Some such unions might be entirely at odds with the particulars of Gorean Philosophy, but they need not be. In fact, most aren't. Within the institution of marriage, many different types of relationship are possible.”

You are right such unions are entirely at odds with the particulars of Gorean Philosophy. You cannot have a marriage while maintaining the Gorean Philosophy because you by having that Marriage as the State would endow each party rights that are not consistent with Free Companionship. You would be agreeing to one set of rules then turning around and then to turn your back on the same set in favor of others.

“In recent posts, you yourself have commented upon the fact that there are some cultural examples of actual slavery in existence, flying under the radar of western society in certain religious and familial groupings; in such cases, often, the married female is (although "legally"married), for all intents and purposes, a slave. Thus, obviously marriage in that context can include slavery, which some might argue is completely anti-Gorean in all aspects, since "a slave cannot hold property" or whatever else.”

Then why not have an actual Free Companionship verse Marriage? You take away the excuses of many to be married and then turn around and claim to be Gorean or to be living by the Gorean Philosophy. There is no need to be married not even for tax purposes since Married folks have what is called the marriage penalty.

"A Gorean free woman does not change her name in the ceremony of the Free Companionship. She remains who she was. In such a ceremony two free individuals have elected to become companions. The Earth woman, as a consequence of certain mating ceremonials, may change her last name. The first and other names, however, tend to remain constant."
--Explorers of Gor
--Married women upon Earth are not required to legally change their surnames, though many do, taking the male "gens" surname (as Norman discusses in Magicians of Gor). Most married women on Earth do NOT change their first name, though-- such would be considered by many to be unthinkable. Which it typically would be, to a Free Gorean.”

You are pointing out a difference between Marriage and Free Companionship. In Free Companionship the female does not change her name. In Marriage the female may change her name at her option. I missed this difference between marriage and free companionship. Thank-you for pointing this out to support what I have said.


"I noted that the girls who had been once their slaves, captured enemies, now wore no longer their collars of gold, but instead stood at their sides as Free Companions."
--Assassin of Gor”

Other differences.  Why? The status of marriage does not change. Free Companionship status does change if a female is freed or if a Free Comparison (the female) falls slave-unlike in marriage.
“Too, though Gorean Free Companionships (like Earth marriages) are sometimes contracted between families, the Gorean Free Companionship can also be entered into freely at the wish of the female involved, as is the case in most modern Western marriages.”

Yes Free Companionship can be arranged but that does not make the Free Companionship into marriage or equal to marriage. How the Free Companionship or Marriage comes about is not at issue rather the Free Companionship and Marriage is what is being discussed not if it is arranged or not.

“Gorean Free Companionship seems to require only the following: that the two parties who enter into it are legally free, that they interlink their arms and drink wine at the companionship ceremony, that they formally agree to repeat that action every year on their anniversary and decide at that time whether or not to continue the relationship or end it, and that during the course of that relationship both parties remain free-- legal enslavement ends the companionship immediately.”

I mention this. This is another difference between marriage and free companionship.

“Frankly, Norman uses the Gorean Free Companionship as an analogy for Earth marriage so often in the Gor books that it is pretty obvious that the two relationships bear striking similarity.”

That is an opinion. The books clearly make a difference between Free Companionship and Marriage. You have stated so.

The external IS often a necessary requirement.

If a woman is naturally a slave, but falls under the command of a weak master, and decides that she is therefore NOT a slave... is that not an example of the missing "external" component (in that case, an excellent Mastery)?
If she decides that she must be a Free Woman, therefore... but later meets an excellent Master and realizes that she was mistaken-- and that she IS actually a natural slave, but could only learn it at the feet of masterful male-- is that not equally an example of the necessary external component completing her internal process?
Gorean M/s is about the relationship between the Master and the slave. Without the presence and input of the other, each is an incomplete part of the equation. One cannot be a slave to oneself-- the impetus comes from the relationship, and the relationship must come from somewhere outside of herself.”

I believe Norman addressed this clearly.

“Fighting Slave of Gor Page 301:
“Woman is born to the collar and love", said Tenalion.  You have put her in a collar. And she must now, helplessly, seek the other"


Renegades of Gor Page 273
“The condition of slavery does not require the collar, or the brand, or an anklet, bracelet or ring, or any such overt sign of bondage. Such things, as symbolic as they are, as profoundly meaningful as they are, and as useful as they are for marking properties, identifying masters, and such, are not necessary to slavery. They are, in effect, though their affixing can legally effect imbondment, ultimately, in themselves, tokens of bondage, and are not to be confused with the reality itself. The uncollared slave is not then a free woman but only a slave who is not then in a collar. Similarly a slave is still a slave even if her brand could be made to magically disappear or, if she has been a made a slave in some other way, if she had not yet been branded. Indeed, some masters, somewhat foolishly, I think, dally in the branding of their slaves. Indeed, some, perhaps the most foolish, do not brand them at all. Such girls, however, when they come into the
keeping of new masters, usually discover that that oversight is promptly remedied. The slave who lies about her slavery," I said, "is not thereby the less a slave. It is only that she is then a lying slave."

----

“Who says that it is not renewed each year? If two are married, and on their anniversary address whether to continue or not, is that not a renewal?”

Vows are renewed not the Marriage.

“What about the division of property? Should that be addressed every year? You keep saying contract, but could you show me how the legalities of a FC contract would be applied to the legal system in the US or similar?”

I recently learned through a Co-Habituation Agreement? (Which does not qualify as a Marriage in any respect.)

----

“Because it's the SAME thing, it's a form of marriage, again, the solution for it is different. Marcus has already pointed out and in length gone into why there is this difference between a Gorean Free Companionship and a Earthly marrige arrangment and too what it's based on.”

The differences have been pointed out.

“Yes, marriage CAN mean that and embrace/include that which you mention, but it too can do so with a lot of other things you haven't mentioned or included.”

Not legally under the Marriage laws as already pointed out and even stated by Marcus himself the when you get married prevents it.

----

“Sure, someone could have a lawyer draw up a legal contract between two individuals regarding property division and the like. It might be called a "Free Companionship." Or it might equally be called a "pre-nuptial agreement."

You are still subject to the marriage laws and most people fight pre-nuptial agreements.

“Just because a marriage does not automatically legally end if it is not re-pledged each year on the anniversary doesn't mean that it might not voluntarily be ENDED if not formally re-pledged, with the divorce being a mere formality. So if that's the totality of your argument against Free Companionship within marriage, I must say I disagree.”

Then you disagree as to what Norman states what a Free Companionship is. The Free Companionship is quite different. The differences are in black and white. The differences are clear.

“Since none of us currently live under Gorean law, we have no choice but to function under Earth legalities, some of which make different provisions than would exist upon Gor.”

Muslims live their way.
The Hindu live their way.
The Polygamists live their way.
---All despite Earth Legalities and in the United States.

The difference is that they have actually chosen to live by their philosophy no matter what the consequence may be.

"The argument that Earth law bestows legal rights upon the married spouse which would not exist upon Gor is no different than the argument that Earth society bestows legal rights upon the female slave which she would not have upon Gor. And both may well be true."

I am sure the above groups would disagree. Why? These groups actually live what they state no matter what the law says. They keep to themselves and do not cause a problem outside their own world.

I can understand the vigor in disagreeing since many are married and do not change their actual relationship more consistent to what Gor is yet claim to live the Gorean philosophy. It is by choice they do not change. You do not live something you do not practice despite...

(in reply to MarcusofAr)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Oaths and Professions: Gorean Men Only, Please Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.719