Kirata
Posts: 6362
Joined: 2/11/2006 From: USA Status: offline
|
Tal Leonidas, Since we've moved off-topic to a related issue, and probably the central issue, nobody, including me, would argue that Gor, in its culture and laws, isn't what it is. But if that's where we stop, we've neglected to answer some questions. We all know what Gor is, but what does it all mean? If there is something there, something the books are seeking to convey, something the books seek to direct our attention to, then the stories are a means to an end. And if part of what they seek is to direct our attention toward the truths of our nature as Nature has made us, then everything changes. The books aren't about Gor anymore, they're about us. The salient fact of female human nature, then, becomes exactly what the books say it is, namely, that in every free woman there is a slave girl, and in every slave girl there is a free woman. And in that context, Gor's fictional slave girls and free women take on allegorical quality. Fictional customs and laws, crafted to support an allegory that points to something beyond itself, something within our nature, do not trump the reality which is that nature. That is why I do not "get" elevating them above that reality. For in reality, women are women, whether free or slave, and our natural response is to save them. Your favorite poster-child, Kirata
< Message edited by Kirata -- 1/23/2009 10:53:29 PM >
|