Trevelyan
Posts: 528
Joined: 6/12/2006 From: Mountain View, CA Status: offline
|
Tal Bull, On a personal note you might be interested in: I am doing some business with an older gentleman. As we were doing our business he said "so you were a soldier once, weren't you? So was I." I asked him when he had been a soldier. January 1942 thought January 1946. I asked him what unit he was in. C/1/505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division! He is quite proud of the fact that it was still June 5th, 1944 when he landed in Normandy. Turns out he is mentioned by name in The Longest Day. Pretty cool, eh! Ok. Gorean Freedom. I think that Norman's central thesis in his books is that nearly everyone in modern day North America is unhappy, unhealthy, and unfulfilled because they try to live their lives in accordance with (IAW) politically correct fictions about how human beings are, rather that IAW with the truth of our nature. Norman presents the Free Gorean, in several different Gorean cultures, as the epitome of humans who do live IAW the way people actually are. What are the characteristics of a free Gorean: - They are sovereign in their personal territory - They identify with, love and are allegiant to their community - They identify with and take pride in the work that they do, and perform that work eithically and excellently. - They subscribe to a particular notion of right and wrong: * they assume that people are not equal, not the same, but quite different in many ways. * they are bent toward conquest and defiance * they strive to exhibit honor, courage, hardness and strength * they agree with the statement "We are not equal; we are not the same; become equal to me; then we will be the same." * they also agree with the statement "Be strong, and do as you will. The swords of others will set your limits." Someone in the books who meets those characteristics is considered to be free. If someone in the books does not meet those characterisics, they are either an outlaw or a slave. This is true in all of the various cultures Norman presents (Torvaldslanders, Red Hunters, Red Savages, etc.) in addition the the dominant Gorean culture of the cites. Perhaps expressed a little differently, but still present. (I should throw in here that I am making these assertions after long study of the books, and I can back up any of the points I am making with book references. I am just skipping it here because I am on my lunch break.) Norman is telling us that if we live in accordance with these characteristics we will be happier, healthier and more fulfilled because we will be living in accordance with the truth about what makes people happy, healthy and fulfilled. Now, does this mean just do anything you want? Well, within the parameters of the characteristics, yes. But, if you choose not to work, or not to be part of your community, for example, then no. Gorean freedom is freedom within the characteristics, not absolute freedom. Although this has generated a sometimes contentious but I think productive discussion, I feel that free Goreans "dispise" slaves because they do not live up to the characteristics of a free Gorean. I think part of the reason for the disagreement here is the way most of us think of the word "dispise." I think the best way to understand this word is as the opposite of the word "respect." If I am a Gorean in the books, and I meet another man or woman who displays the characteristics of a free person, I will "repect" them, and consider them to be at least roughly my equal. If I meet a slave, they will not display the characteristics; I will not respect them or consider them my equal. Instead I will consider them to be inferior and I will "dispise" them. One other note about dispising slaves - If I am a Gorean free man, I will despise slaves, male and female. However, lets say I own a female slave. If I am any kind of a Gorean, I will ensure that she is absolutely obedient and exquisitely pleasing to me. Since she is my possession, I will want to know all about her, be facinated with her and perhaps even be proud of my possession of her. I may even fall in love with her. But I will not "respect" her as an equal, I will despise her. This is why so many of the male characters in the books (Rask, Clitius, etc.) become so upset when they realize they are falling in love with a slave. It seems like a contradicition to us, but a Gorean can despise a slave because she is a slave, and still be crazy with desire and love for her. (Bull, I know that one of your favorite characters is Jason. Mine too. Remember how much trouble he had mastering Beverly? The reason is that he had been so deeply conditioned by Earth culture that he had to respect her. As long as he respected her, he could not master her. He could master other girls, but not her, because he respected her. It was only when he learned to despise her rather than respect her that he could master her, and they could both be fulfilled.) A slave who has accepted their slavery does not meet the characteristics of a free Gorean. There are several characters in the books who are enslaved at one point or another, but because internally they still embody the "free" characteristics, they inevitably become free. (for example Tarl, Jason, Fish, Rim, Verna) Now, regarding females and slavery - a biological truth that Goreans accept and incorporate into their lives is the order of nature - humans are part of nature, a species of animal, and the human species is male-dominant. When a man dominates a woman he isn't being kinky, he is behaving in accordance with his biological programming. And women are biologically programmed to behave submissively towards men. In the books, Norman says repeatedly that inside every woman is a free woman seeking her companion, and a slave seeking her master. I know this is going to raise a ruckus, but on Gor a woman is free because men allow her to be free, or she is slave because men have made her a slave. Again, lots and lots of examples in the books. And, unlike men, because of the order of nature, most women can find fulfillment as a free woman or as a slave. One great example of that from the books is Dina of Turia. Great slave, foolishly free though by Tarl, who becomes a strong and courageous free woman of the bakers. That is another good point to cover - you mention someone with a "slave nature." What is that? Where does it talk about it in the books? If I recall some of your earlier postings, someone with a slave nature is someone who has a hard time here on Earth living as a "free" person - they make poor decisions, don't like responsiblity, etc. Is that the kind of woman that the slavers look for, either on Gor or on Earth? NO! They look for women you are intelligent, proud, strong and spirited - because those women make the best slaves! Now, of course, they also look for women who are richly feminine, but they are not looking for wimps. And, once they are mastered by a strong man, these intelligent, strong, spirted women become exquisite slaves - because of the reality of the order of nature. Gorean slaves are not "free" as you suggest. Men are not fulfilled in slavery. Those who should be free eventually become free. Those who are too weak to be free eventually die as miserable slaves. Women; if strong, intelligent and spirited; can be fulfilled as Free women or as slaves because of the Order of nature. A different kind of fulfillment, perhaps, but both can be fulfilled. But a kajira, though fulfilled, is in now way free. One last quick thing - the slavers who took him had not identified Jason as being weak and only fit to serve as a slave (at least no more so than any Earth male); he just happened to get into the taxi cab with Beverly and got trapped along with her. Once on Gor, he proved he was no slave. I wish you well my friend Trevelyan
_____________________________
"In short the differences between the men of Earth and those of Gor were almost certain to be primarily cultural, and not physiological." Mercenaries of Gor
|