|
kajjirus -> RE: Great Stone Couches (8/4/2009 4:14:45 AM)
|
Master: Since the books are based on Earth-type slavery (especially Greek and Roman), this one imagines that the word "couch" is to be interpreted as it was in the old days: that is, any even vaguely bench-like object that a person could sit or sleep on. The "couch" was stone, perhaps, and heaped with furs in the books, instead of a mattress. Slave rings were places on the couch so that the slave could be properly restrained and often, after use or if not needed, the slave would be chained to the foot of the couch, sleeping on the floor. One does not believe, Master, that Master John Norman meant a couch of the soft type that most of us are familiar with. It was essentially a sign of affluence and status: the rich and powerful used couches, most often in ancient and medieval times and the poor curled up on the floor in the kitchen or wherever they could find a spot. One also imagines, if it pleases Master, that the couches were seldom used for sitting, in those days; one imagines the Gorean Free sitting as Master has described.... Though, too, it is possible that there are scenes with the Free reclining at meals.... Well wishes, ketil quote:
ORIGINAL: Nephilim What exactly Is a stone couch anyway? The books also mention round stone couches. Where did John Norman get this (did Romans sleep on some sort of stone couch)? Did he have something against mattresses? Also, most warriors sat cross legged "as a warrior sits", did other castes recline against each other while at the tables? Sure, slaves kneel, but if all free people sit cross legged, isn't that what he would have said?
|
|
|
|