Aswad
Posts: 6619
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mitzie she should not battle what is terminal but accept it How do you square this with defiance, as opposed to resignation and acceptance ? This being the Gorean subforum and all. I certainly don't mean to be insensitive to Jill's situation; I'm asking you. Once you stop fearing death, you can come out of terminal illness with a stalemate or better. The illness can kill you, but not break you, because death is an option you can choose, in a time and manner of your choosing. In that defiance, a partial victory can be achieved by denying "the enemy" a complete victory, and by going out as you are and wish to be at the end. One can argue that this is winning by changing the premise of victory, of course, but I would rather say it is anthropomorphizing, if anything. It's related to what has been said elsewhere about death before enslavement. That said, I'm not about to second Rule's approach, but yeah, there are actually ways to attack the cancer that the docs are not going to do, for the simple reason that it's as likely to kill you as your illness. Do no harm and all that. If death truly isn't feared, though, it can certainly be reasonable to go for an all-or-nothing approach, depending on how one is wired, as well as the options available. Killing off a whole cell line throughout the body makes little sense if the cancer is fully undifferentiated, or the cell line is a neuron type. Experiments with gallium compounds makes more sense when the cancer cells cluster. Modified rabies only makes sense for glioblastomas and the like. Lethal radiation levels are lots less pleasant than nearly lethal ones. Polonium pellets are usually hard to obtain without shielding. Radon gas tends to cluster in the lungs. Etc. Etc. When your back is to the wall and the enemy is advancing from in front of you, the only question is ... ... will you soar through them or die trying, or will you wait for them to close the distance and run you through? Finally, Rule does have one good point: the recorded cases of spontaneous remission from severe cancers are almost universally the consequence of sudden and massive immune response, such as after a nearly fatal infection, or when the immune system needs to kill legitimate cells by the boatload for some reason, or when some accidental or intentional act causes the cancer to be killed in a process that would normally kill the rest of the body (e.g. radiation poisoning), in that order, pretty much. I can certainly see the point of trying to make the most of the time she has left. Just pointing out that the alternative isn't invalid, either. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|