Aswad
Posts: 6619
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: online
|
Hey, Mitzie. I am intimately familiar with terminal illness and the associated issues. As you may or may not remember, I was there when my mother reaffirmed her decision to terminate life support upon waking from her coma. I buried her myself, and performed a funeral rite as a lay priest. And I was one of those who discussed her preferences with her between the two first rounds of chemo. As such, the matter is not just theoretical to me. Dismissing out of hand the legitimate decision that some make (that they would rather die as a consequence of their own actions during the course of pursuing a "victory or death" aesthetic, instead of allowing things to run their course and taking the safe bet on a reasonably well known amount of time to make the best out of in relative comfort), however, is a thing I simply cannot consider particularly respectful. As I said elsewhere in the thread, by my aesthetic, dying well is dying on your own terms. Whether those terms are taking the time one has left and letting the illness run its course, to end it before its time, or even to fight when there is no realistic chance of victory (an act of defiance, a Gorean virtue, I would argue), I still hold that to die on one's own terms is the measure of dying well for someone with terminal cancer. To give up and resigning oneself to what is to come, rather than making a conscious decision, however, is not- IMO- dying on one's own terms. And, really, resignation does not strike me as a particularly Gorean virtue. Marauders has some commentary on resignation that you might wish to review. Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|