RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh.

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh.

Page: << < prev 12 13 14 15 [16]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 9:02:49 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Panda, Well the chappy didnt come back yet, so Im holding my breath:) so the weirdnesss is all good:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)

Profile

Post #: 301

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 9:14:28 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MarsBonfire

Does anyone else find it a bit odd that people on a BDSM site would complain about an arts grant to Robert Mapplethorpe? But they would, in all probability condone such funding going to some anti-sex religiously based art instead?

Curiouser and curiouser...

I find it a strange thought, true enough, but then I've seen people arguing in favour of censorship on horror messageboards as well. No idea how that one works, either.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to MarsBonfire)

Profile

Post #: 302

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 9:15:12 AM

kittinSol

Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

This isnt going to end well is it
Lucy

It's turned extremely weird, actually.

Slightly surreal, but incredible fun :-) .

_____________________________

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)

Profile

Post #: 303

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 11:47:46 AM

rulemylife

Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

since Ballistas came from before muskets can I have a ballista? Can I have one, unca Rushbutt, can I can I huh?

I would like one of those canons I keep hearing so much about, but I"m pretty sure those don't shoot anything.

(in reply to HatesParisHilton)

Profile

Post #: 304

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 12:09:29 PM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

I want a Trebuchet dammit. To heck with a musket

(in reply to rulemylife)

Profile

Post #: 305

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 2:06:50 PM

SpinnerofTales

Posts: 1586
Joined: 5/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

Barrista Ballistas! we shoot snotty drama student bitches serving lattes in black plastic framed elvis costello glasses and skinnyfit jeans at Obie Wan Bama worshippers for being UNAMERICAN!

and we paint swastikas over their trampstamps!

First Kate Bush, now Elvis Costello....I'm impressed. If reading your posts didn't make me feel a little like listening to nadstadt (It was me and my three droogs enjoying the old miloko plus and getting ready for a bit of the old ultraviolence real horrorshow), we could have a great conversation.

(in reply to HatesParisHilton)

Profile

Post #: 306

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 6:55:10 PM

thornhappy

Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingAZ
Or in other words, if you don't have health insurance why the hell are you even able to post here ? Certainly health insurance is a more important responsibility than Internet connectivity (or cell phone, cable, or car payment, ad infinitum).

Go out and price it, compadre. Especially if there's been a gap in coverage and you have any (at all) pre-existing conditions. Or just a gap in your coverage. Add a few kids for fun.

I can see where cars are more important than health insurance (no car, no job in most places).

BTW, I have insurance, so I guess I'm permitted to post.

thornhappy

(in reply to SeekingAZ)

Profile

Post #: 307

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 8:49:54 PM

tazzygirl

Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

I was sent this... thought it could make for interesting reading, though i dont believe it deserves its own thread. Almost makes me feel... pity...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/02/opinion/02brooks.html?_r=3&scp=2&sq=david%20brooks&st=cse

"It is a story as old as “The Wizard of Oz,” of grand illusions and small men behind the curtain."

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thornhappy)

Profile

Post #: 308

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 10:13:16 PM

HatesParisHilton

Posts: 3513
Joined: 12/27/2006
Status: offline

OKAY, spinner, ala stand up, will you PLEASE inform Mr . "I find it a strange thought, true enough, but then I've seen people arguing in favour of censorship on horror messageboards as well. No idea how that one works, either" and the goodly man who thought I was bagging Maple Syrup* on a censorship level that I was actually doing my Mad TV "mock the conservatives" schtick? Like Richard Pryor or Fliop Wilson mocking an uptight Bostonian banker?

good god, it feels like only you, me, and kitten are the only folks in this thread whom have actually PAID MONEY to see good anti-establishment stand-up.

I mean, I paid for TREE, man, remember him, in the early 90's?

I actually answered one of his rhetorical questions he poses in his act (he left the pregnant pause too long, so too bad) and made the audience roar and HE laughed too, breaking out of character and breaking the Fourth Wall.

THAT was a good moment. But, help me out here. Maple Syrup's rights RE censorship, I was never discussing except satirically, but I have to be honest and not defend the artistic "quality" of his work if it is limited.

BTW, moonhead, I am not in favour of censorship and I've probably drawn more NASTY horror stuff tan you could shake a stick at, including Mortician students (around 20 years old) fucking madly ontop of a GRAVESTONE in a revered cemetary.
But see, that was written by GOOD writer, and Maple Leaf is a BAD artist.

* as in the fluid he used to use to Toss the Salad, god bless him.

_____________________________

I am (now) "Hiltie", hear me ROARRRRR! And have a cuffy cake, they're nice.

(in reply to tazzygirl)

Profile

Post #: 309

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/2/2009 11:08:21 PM

thornhappy

Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If the right to bear arms thing was going to reflect the circumstances when the country was founded, presumably it shouldn't cover anything besides smoothbore muskets?
(Also, my understanding was that the notion of an armed population was seen as preferable to a standing army, as is is the situation in Switzerland. The 'States has had quite a big army for a long while now, so it's a redundant amendment under the terms it was set up on.)

From what I've read, gun ownership was rare at the time of the revolution. There was no mass production at the time, and there were no standardised weapons in the revolutionary army.

I wonder what the 2nd amendment authors would think of the assortment of weapons available today.

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 310

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/3/2009 5:41:00 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HatesParisHilton

OKAY, spinner, ala stand up, will you PLEASE inform Mr . "I find it a strange thought, true enough, but then I've seen people arguing in favour of censorship on horror messageboards as well. No idea how that one works, either" and the goodly man who thought I was bagging Maple Syrup* on a censorship level that I was actually doing my Mad TV "mock the conservatives" schtick? Like Richard Pryor or Fliop Wilson mocking an uptight Bostonian banker?

good god, it feels like only you, me, and kitten are the only folks in this thread whom have actually PAID MONEY to see good anti-establishment stand-up.

I mean, I paid for TREE, man, remember him, in the early 90's?

I actually answered one of his rhetorical questions he poses in his act (he left the pregnant pause too long, so too bad) and made the audience roar and HE laughed too, breaking out of character and breaking the Fourth Wall.

THAT was a good moment. But, help me out here. Maple Syrup's rights RE censorship, I was never discussing except satirically, but I have to be honest and not defend the artistic "quality" of his work if it is limited.

BTW, moonhead, I am not in favour of censorship and I've probably drawn more NASTY horror stuff tan you could shake a stick at, including Mortician students (around 20 years old) fucking madly ontop of a GRAVESTONE in a revered cemetary.
But see, that was written by GOOD writer, and Maple Leaf is a BAD artist.

* as in the fluid he used to use to Toss the Salad, god bless him.

Chill, effendi. I thought you might be on the wind up, and I just mentioned that as another example of the bizarre double standard you mentioned and rightly have a problem with, okay?
(Mapplethorpe isn't a very good artist, but he did do some very good photography when he was still doing commercial work. He managed a few very good album covers, Marquee Moon in particular.)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to HatesParisHilton)

Profile

Post #: 311

RE: Glen Beck and rush Limbaugh. - 10/3/2009 6:36:34 AM

HatesParisHilton

Posts: 3513
Joined: 12/27/2006
Status: offline

Oh, yeah, the Marquee Moon cover still stands up. and I like effendi, I think it's a lovely word that should be used more often. Stan the Man used it back in the 60's, in fact.

which makes me wonder why Kevin Smith didn't swipe it as an homage motif. Hm.

Of course I have to admit that when it comes to horror art , Basil Golgos will ALWAYS be the King. He is the Elvis of Horror painting.

Now, spinner, c'mon, I mean ~ "If reading your posts didn't make me feel a little like listening to nadstadt (It was me and my three droogs enjoying the old miloko plus and getting ready for a bit of the old ultraviolence real horrorshow), we could have a great conversation"...

But of course, mon ami. That's what posting is FOR, yet one more expressive enterprise. I don't paint to merely illustrate, I never write to merely communicate, I EVOKE, baby, I evoke.

I also INVOKE but that's a whole 'nother kettle of fish.

But as you and I share a mescal milk while we waltz in our bowler hats down Kubrick luvviin' memory Lane, might I spike your nasty-nice-nice with a hallucinogenically-treated spritz of Matt Johnson, particularly the albums Infected and the one after that, JUST because we know how much Sanity and Heretic would utterly grind their teeth to the concepto-groove of the Mightily Masestic The The?

Now MATT, HE was a true "we ain't gonna let the Cons steal our bread and souls" guy.

_____________________________

I am (now) "Hiltie", hear me ROARRRRR! And have a cuffy cake, they're nice.

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 312