Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: The role of the US in the world


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The role of the US in the world Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 8:37:01 AM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


In addition to the list of territories that we directly control, like Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Samoa, one could argue that every American state that we did not pay for was taken by brute force- New Mexico, Arizona, California, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, either taken from the Native Americans or Mexico.

But we are an Empire not just because of the territories we directly control. We currently have about 1,000 military bases around the world. ONE THOUSAND military posts scattered around the world, from Greenland to Diego Garcia, from Japan to Germany.

It is hard for Americans to understand this, but there was a time when this was not so; there was a time when we stayed within our own borders and American soldiers were asked to die for America, not Helmand Province in Afghanistan.

I would ask Americans to consider how hateful and destructive it is to keep occupying armies on other people's country; Imagine for a moment if you were to wake up tomorrow and see German fighter jets screaming across the Manhattan skyline; if you saw British tanks rumbling down the streets of Chicago; if you went to a bar and it was crowded with Italian soldiers;

No matter how much we like our foreign allies, it would make my blood boil to see foreign troops parading through my town- so what makes us think others don't feel that way?
How much hatred and anger are we generating by being an occupying Empire, who maintains an army on nearly every bit of foreign soil on earth?

There was a time when American leaders did not sit around casually discussing which governments of the world we should allow to exist, and which ones we should topple; when we did not insist on treating the entire globe as a chess board on which to play the Great Game of political intrigue.

We are following exactly the pattern of the British Empire- the same Empire that people like Washington shed blood to get rid of.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 9:20:45 AM   
elegantcdgoddess


Posts: 47
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain

It has to do with money. Like starting the war in Iraq to get oil in order to keep the United States economy lubricated.



noooooo, you killed my dream, it was for poor innocent people of Iraq to bring them peace and freedom, and Coke and Big Mac.....

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:20:09 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


In addition to the list of territories that we directly control, like Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Samoa, one could argue that every American state that we did not pay for was taken by brute force- New Mexico, Arizona, California, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, either taken from the Native Americans or Mexico.

But we are an Empire not just because of the territories we directly control. We currently have about 1,000 military bases around the world. ONE THOUSAND military posts scattered around the world, from Greenland to Diego Garcia, from Japan to Germany.

It is hard for Americans to understand this, but there was a time when this was not so; there was a time when we stayed within our own borders and American soldiers were asked to die for America, not Helmand Province in Afghanistan.

I would ask Americans to consider how hateful and destructive it is to keep occupying armies on other people's country; Imagine for a moment if you were to wake up tomorrow and see German fighter jets screaming across the Manhattan skyline; if you saw British tanks rumbling down the streets of Chicago; if you went to a bar and it was crowded with Italian soldiers;

No matter how much we like our foreign allies, it would make my blood boil to see foreign troops parading through my town- so what makes us think others don't feel that way?
How much hatred and anger are we generating by being an occupying Empire, who maintains an army on nearly every bit of foreign soil on earth?

There was a time when American leaders did not sit around casually discussing which governments of the world we should allow to exist, and which ones we should topple; when we did not insist on treating the entire globe as a chess board on which to play the Great Game of political intrigue.

We are following exactly the pattern of the British Empire- the same Empire that people like Washington shed blood to get rid of.



Rex, agreed. we keep hearing from the powers that be that, "we have "interests" in S. Korea."
Oh, is that so? What "interests" and exactly who has them?
We've had Troops in S. Korea for going on 60 years now! When are we going to bring them home?
If it's big corporations that have "interests" in S. Korea then let *them* pay for their own security needs not the Taxpayers!
And we need to stop all this adventurism and imperialism in foreign countries.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:30:23 AM   
Anarrus


Posts: 475
Joined: 11/8/2005
Status: offline
An interesting watch...
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/10/hoodwinked_former_economic_hit_man_john

15 minutes but worth it.

< Message edited by Anarrus -- 11/10/2009 10:38:48 AM >


_____________________________

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."...Goethe
"Send lawyers, guns and money" ..Warren Zevon

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:33:21 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

the US being the last made country,


I doubt Australians and Canadians would agree with you on that.

quote:

then maybe the US being a conglomerate of the world's peoples now seek to right the wrongs in the lands of their ancestors, effectively become the nation that polices the world.

I wonder how much ancestry plays a part in the U.S.'s interactions abroad ?



A cursorary reading of American History shows a saga of Expansionism and Empire beginning into the Northwest Territories, followed by the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, and then the race westward between the Slave Power and the Industrial Power to take land from Mexico, Hawaii, Russia, and finally the Philippines. not to mention excursions into Canada, Central America, and China.

We have still not gotten out of the habit of meddling in other nations' affairs. Used to be called neo-colonialism. today it is called neo-conservativism.

Respectfully, I think your speculation of benign meddling in the name of ancestrial justice is naive.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to Aneirin)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:38:38 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


In addition to the list of territories that we directly control, like Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Samoa, one could argue that every American state that we did not pay for was taken by brute force- New Mexico, Arizona, California, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, either taken from the Native Americans or Mexico.

But we are an Empire not just because of the territories we directly control. We currently have about 1,000 military bases around the world. ONE THOUSAND military posts scattered around the world, from Greenland to Diego Garcia, from Japan to Germany.

It is hard for Americans to understand this, but there was a time when this was not so; there was a time when we stayed within our own borders and American soldiers were asked to die for America, not Helmand Province in Afghanistan.

I would ask Americans to consider how hateful and destructive it is to keep occupying armies on other people's country; Imagine for a moment if you were to wake up tomorrow and see German fighter jets screaming across the Manhattan skyline; if you saw British tanks rumbling down the streets of Chicago; if you went to a bar and it was crowded with Italian soldiers;

No matter how much we like our foreign allies, it would make my blood boil to see foreign troops parading through my town- so what makes us think others don't feel that way?
How much hatred and anger are we generating by being an occupying Empire, who maintains an army on nearly every bit of foreign soil on earth?
There was a time when American leaders did not sit around casually discussing which governments of the world we should allow to exist, and which ones we should topple; when we did not insist on treating the entire globe as a chess board on which to play the Great Game of political intrigue.

We are following exactly the pattern of the British Empire- the same Empire that people like Washington shed blood to get rid of.



Give em hell, Rex!

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:39:19 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


Late in the 19th Century, American policymakers forgot the principles of the Founding Fathers and decided that we should become an Empire, not a Republic.



ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


You can start with this, but a good history book might be beneficial.


Important Quotations from Downes v. Bidwell


The Spanish-American War, ignited by the February 1898 explosion of the USS Maine and ending with the December Treaty of Paris (signed Dec. 10, 1898; came into force April 11, 1899), was a short-lived event with dramatic repercussions.

By the terms of the treaty ending the war, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Cuba, and Guam. The United States then found itself in the novel (for Americans) position of becoming a world power with overseas territories, in the tradition of Britain, France, and Spain.




A weak attempt, even for you. The Spanish American war had nothing to do with empire building. Cuban's wanted independence from Spain and their concentration camps. McKinley tried to stay out of it until the sinking of the Maine.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:41:27 AM   
MstrPBK


Posts: 573
Joined: 1/2/2008
Status: offline
Side Comment: The USA is not the most recently established Country. A number of countries in Africa, Asia, and in the Pacific Ocean have been been established since the conception of the USA in 1776.

MstrPBK
St. Paul, MN USA

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/10/2009 10:43:15 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


In addition to the list of territories that we directly control, like Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Samoa, one could argue that every American state that we did not pay for was taken by brute force- New Mexico, Arizona, California, Oregon, Colorado, Utah, either taken from the Native Americans or Mexico. you cant build an empire before youre a country.

But we are an Empire not just because of the territories we directly control. We currently have about 1,000 military bases around the world. ONE THOUSAND military posts scattered around the world, from Greenland to Diego Garcia, from Japan to Germany. miltary posts do not make the country they are located in part of our empire.

It is hard for Americans to understand this, but there was a time when this was not so; there was a time when we stayed within our own borders and American soldiers were asked to die for America, not Helmand Province in Afghanistan.

I would ask Americans to consider how hateful and destructive it is to keep occupying armies on other people's country; Imagine for a moment if you were to wake up tomorrow and see German fighter jets screaming across the Manhattan skyline; if you saw British tanks rumbling down the streets of Chicago; if you went to a bar and it was crowded with Italian soldiers; I would have no problem if they were invited their for our defense and protection

No matter how much we like our foreign allies, it would make my blood boil to see foreign troops parading through my town- so what makes us think others don't feel that way?
How much hatred and anger are we generating by being an occupying Empire, who maintains an army on nearly every bit of foreign soil on earth? none, since we arent an occupying empire

There was a time when American leaders did not sit around casually discussing which governments of the world we should allow to exist, and which ones we should topple; when we did not insist on treating the entire globe as a chess board on which to play the Great Game of political intrigue.

We are following exactly the pattern of the British Empire- the same Empire that people like Washington shed blood to get rid of.


(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/11/2009 7:31:16 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
Our role is to promote world peace by spreading the religion of windsurfing and keg parties.

Lap dancing maybe.

(in reply to NewOCDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/11/2009 8:05:41 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

A weak attempt, even for you. The Spanish American war had nothing to do with empire building. Cuban's wanted independence from Spain and their concentration camps. McKinley tried to stay out of it until the sinking of the Maine.


Well, let's try to see if we can make some sense of this Willbeur.

You asked:

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


And I answered:

By the terms of the treaty ending the war, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Cuba, and Guam. The United States then found itself in the novel (for Americans) position of becoming a world power with overseas territories, in the tradition of Britain, France, and Spain.

So tell me what part seems to be confusing you and I'll do my best to help out.



(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/11/2009 9:40:04 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

A weak attempt, even for you. The Spanish American war had nothing to do with empire building. Cuban's wanted independence from Spain and their concentration camps. McKinley tried to stay out of it until the sinking of the Maine.


Well, let's try to see if we can make some sense of this Willbeur.

You asked:

ORLY, and exactly what territories have we conquered and taken over?


And I answered:

By the terms of the treaty ending the war, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Cuba, and Guam. The United States then found itself in the novel (for Americans) position of becoming a world power with overseas territories, in the tradition of Britain, France, and Spain.

So tell me what part seems to be confusing you and I'll do my best to help out.





You appear to be the confused one. We didnt conquer and take over PR and Cuba which was my question. They revolted against Spain and then we (reluctantly) helped them. When those revolutions succeeded with our help, Spain ceded them. Phillipines and Guam I dont know enough about and dont give a shit. Your claim of empire building is vapor, period.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/11/2009 11:44:40 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

You appear to be the confused one. We didnt conquer and take over PR and Cuba which was my question. They revolted against Spain and then we (reluctantly) helped them. When those revolutions succeeded with our help, Spain ceded them. Phillipines and Guam I dont know enough about and dont give a shit. Your claim of empire building is vapor, period.


How interesting.

So, let's summarize, yet again.

I'm wrong because you "dont know enough about and dont give a shit".

So how about you come back and talk to me when you do know enough about and give a shit about the topic you are trying to discuss?

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/11/2009 12:12:09 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
After reading the last two postings.....I have come to a decision,in an attempt to not become willbeurised(caught posting about a topic I don't give a shit about)I pledge to only post on those topics I do give a shit about.
Yep...thtas my new policy......of course due to factors beyond my control this policy can not be enforced retroactively.My apoligies made for any posting that might have been posted proir to this new giving a shit policy.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/12/2009 7:14:34 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

You appear to be the confused one. We didnt conquer and take over PR and Cuba which was my question. They revolted against Spain and then we (reluctantly) helped them. When those revolutions succeeded with our help, Spain ceded them. Phillipines and Guam I dont know enough about and dont give a shit. Your claim of empire building is vapor, period.


How interesting.

So, let's summarize, yet again.

I'm wrong because you "dont know enough about and dont give a shit".

So how about you come back and talk to me when you do know enough about and give a shit about the topic you are trying to discuss?




When you come back and admit that your PR and Cuba examples have 0 to do with empire building. Ie on the 12th.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/12/2009 7:15:37 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

After reading the last two postings.....I have come to a decision,in an attempt to not become willbeurised(caught posting about a topic I don't give a shit about)I pledge to only post on those topics I do give a shit about.
Yep...thtas my new policy......of course due to factors beyond my control this policy can not be enforced retroactively.My apoligies made for any posting that might have been posted proir to this new giving a shit policy.


And there you go again, either failing reading comprehension 101 or deliberately misstating someones post. Youre back on ignore.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/12/2009 10:28:22 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


When you come back and admit that your PR and Cuba examples have 0 to do with empire building. Ie on the 12th.


Empire building was never what I responded to.

I responded to your erroneous claim that the U.S. had never conquered any other territories.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/12/2009 6:33:46 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


When you come back and admit that your PR and Cuba examples have 0 to do with empire building. Ie on the 12th.


Empire building was never what I responded to.

I responded to your erroneous claim that the U.S. had never conquered any other territories.



wow. new depths, even for you. The original post from animus rex was about empire building. I responded asking what territories we conquered and took over..ie the definition of empire building by force.

And to preempt more semantic horseshit from the master (or at least the masters best apprentice), we did not conquer Cuba and PR, we supported their revolt against Spain, so even this weak retort is wrong.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: The role of the US in the world - 11/12/2009 9:27:00 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:



ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

wow. new depths, even for you. The original post from animus rex was about empire building. I responded asking what territories we conquered and took over..ie the definition of empire building by force.

And to preempt more semantic horseshit from the master (or at least the masters best apprentice), we did not conquer Cuba and PR, we supported their revolt against Spain, so even this weak retort is wrong.


The only one playing semantic horseshit is you.

We went to war with Spain.

The result of that war was we gained several Spanish territories.

We did not get those territories by buying them, trading for them, or any means of peaceful negotiation for them.


conquer

1. to acquire by force of arms; win in war: to conquer a foreign land.

2. to overcome by force; subdue: to conquer an enemy.

(Dictionary.com Unabridged)

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 79
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The role of the US in the world Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125