NoCalOwner
Posts: 241
Status: offline
|
I'd be interested in hearing whether this came before the justice system because the bottom changed their mind, and really wanted to get the hell out of there. "No limits" is usually problematic. Having no safe word/limits with someone you've exchanged a few emails with is, in my opinion, idiotic and dangerous for all concerned. Remember folks, a BDSM contract is, almost without exception, non-binding, void, and not worth the paper it's written on as far as any court is concerned. "Meretricious consideration" (any contract term which involves sex) will nullify any contract except for marriage, anything in the contract which sounds illegal will void it, any misunderstanding between the parties as to what they're agreeing to kills it too. There are tons of ways for contracts to go wrong, and I've yet to see one which would offer anybody any legal protection at all. But it may well be used to try to convince a jury that there, in your own handwriting, is proof that you're a "perverted sicko."
|