CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3650
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Shylahgirl If you are in a poly D/s or M/s relationship and a second, third, fourth, or what ever number of girl comes into to the relationship as a 24/7 live in service sub/slave, should there be a ranking? Say the "number one girl" has been there for a year... Master has trained her and most of the time her service is flawless should the "number one girl" then hold a rank higher then others who come in latter no matter the others age or past experience outside the relationship? What is your opinion? Shylah Our household is hierarchical, so new servants do hold a lower rank in the household. New free members are also vetted, over time, before they're given status as Keepers. However, once the vetting period is over, the leadership positions in the household aren't divvied up according to how long someone has been in the household -- leadership positions are handled as "promotions" in any other organization would be. Those who show leadership potential are gradually given more opportunities to express that talent, as trainers, section overseers, and eventually, as either Head Butler or Chatelaine. These roles, however, are -earned-, by exemplary performance, excellent communication skills, talents in bringing out the best in their colleagues, etc. One thing that it is important to note is that leadership roles among our household's servants are not "privilege" positions -- in fact, they are often challenging roles, with additional responsibilities above and beyond those required of a non-leadership servant. Our Keepers expect a lot from those who act as our hands and voices when we can't be there. All of our servants are cherished for what they bring to the table. We have some wonderful servants who really don't -want- to be trainers or head servants, but they are cherished just the same for what they -do- bring. Leadership, at least for us, isn't a bargaining chip based around who is "better" or has been around longer -- it is a talent, that we nurture in those who show an aptitude... and they, in turn, take on greater responsibility not to garner favor, but because they thrive under the experience. Sometimes, you'll find someone who seems like xhe'd do well in leadership, but when the chips are down, xhe just can't evoke a positive response in those xhe's supposed to lead -- for someone in that situation, we'd have no issue whatsoever with doing the necessary counseling, and removing hir from the leadership role if necessary. Someone unsuited to leadership is not going to thrive when forced to try to function as a leader, so it is a mark of caring to make sure that those who -do- provide leadership roles are suited to be able to find and evoke the best in themselves and those they lead. Dame Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|