AnimusRex
Posts: 2104
Joined: 5/13/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth My view is that good, healthy love strengthens a bond rather than weakening it. Truer words were never spoken. There is a line of thinking that I view with skepticism- it occurs in both BDSM and Gor. Mostly it goes along the lines that love is somehow a threat or detriment to Mastery, that love becomes a problem to be solved. The corollary to this is that true, actual Mastery (not the sort that posers and fakes have) is something deeper, something far more intense and grand and exotic, superior to the mundane Mr. & Mrs. Vanilla stuff. The problem I have with this, is that by making this thing we call Mastery into something strange and exotic and superior, it elevates the bar to success to impossible levels. Does Mastery really need to be this bizarre Svengali state of psychic bond? Is the relationship really so absolute, so dramatic as to be equal to a science fiction novel? That sounds more like a teenage romantic notion of Prince Charming and My Perfect Wedding Day, than a real person who lives a real life. We have had a few threads about the silly girls who put up profiles that breathlessly gush about how they want to be "absolute 24/7 TPE slaves" with "no rights, no limits, no escape" and how they will do ANYTHING, yes ANYTHING no matter how sick, how bizarre, that My Lord and Master wants! Except of course, she won't do housework, and won't tolerate a second girl. I can only speak from my own life experience- but I believe that love can be the engine that drives a level of servitude that goes deeper, further, to more extremes than any kink. BDSM is for the most part based on the fantasies of the Marquis de Sade, and The Story of O. It is meant to be kinky, strange and exotic. Gor, by contrast is based on reality; it isn't a fantasy dreamed up out of whole cloth, but has real predecessors, real case studies we can look at and draw from. Ancient Rome, the Native Americans, Scandinavian Vikings, etc. were the models that formed the basis of the books. Unlike BDSM, Gor is not a kinky version of "Lets play harem slave and Sultan". It is something you can actually live, day in and day out. I live next door to an Afghan family. They live in the traditional Patriarchal way, where the women are veiled, and literally the property of their husbands. I would argue they are living as true and absolute a Gorean life as anyone reading this. Yet the Patriarch of the family clearly loves his wife and children, and has no trouble expressing it. He doesn't seem to have any of this psychic conflict, he doesn't seem to sit around navel gazing and pondering "did she fetch my coffee because she loves me, or because she is compelled by a force beyond her will?" People like this are the model for how Kim and I live, and it is what draws me to Gor in the first place. I don't really see the advantage in turing so natural and normal a thing as servitude and ownership into something strange and exotic, accessible only to a select priesthood.
|