Collarchat.com

Create a
Free Account
As the Collar Turns:
Collarchat.com - BDSM Forum

Home  Login  Search 
Espanol  Deutsch  Francais  Italiano  Portugues 

RE: Manipulation?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Manipulation? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 12:04:29 AM   
Dangruscurvz


Posts: 26
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline

Oh Kim... for Pete's sake put a cork in it.

You were lamenting? Come on. You were whining in the hopes of spurring some guilt-induced action against what you perceived as some mortal sin against the Holy Gorean Grail.

And it didn't work. So you got smacked on the nose by a couple of Gorean men. You were asking for it.

As one who's been there and done that more times than you can count, trust me. This stuff I know .

Taking responsibility - yes, it's a very important Gorean tenet,  but it doesn't mean that everyone who self-identifies as a Gorean has a built in obligation to correct every nitwit who swaggers in and announces "I fisted my girl in cage! Look at what a big Goreeeeeeeeeeean Mastah I am!"

You see complacency, I see it a little differently.

You know I spent some time reading these boards trying to figure out what all the fuss is about. (That's a couple hours of my time I'll never get back.) What astounded me is not why none of the men replied in that thread, but why anyone would.

Goreans don't like to waste our time and attention on people who have not earned it. When I read those threads, it seemed perfectly understandable to me that many wouldn't bother to reply. Because the crap and those perpetuating it did not merit the effort.

The larger Gorean expectation? Good Grief. Gor isn't our job. And we are not obligated to debunk every piece of idiocy that pops up.  We're not here to pass on all Gorean knowledge tied up in a nice, neat bow to the next generation of would-be Goreans. Nope, not our job.

If  a new person can't figure out what's true from what's BS, they haven't read enough yet.  Back to the Books.  Let them read and study and figure it out and fight for those truths like we did.  That's the Gorean Experience.

It's not a Gorean man's job to ride to the rescue every time a Free Woman gets her panties in a twist because some fool offended her. Nor do they have to answer to you or me or any woman for their choices.

As for accountability... well, Kim you have a golden opportunity to lead by example here. You irritated a couple of men here who have made it very clear that they didn't like the way you communicated your "laments." Regardless of your intent, from where I sit, I'd say it looks like you owe them an apology.

You see, that's the thing about accountability and Goreans. There's no wiggle room. Regardless of our intent, we are still responsible for the impact of our actions. You want the flaming to stop - be the one to take the first step.

I dare you.

~Dangrus


Those who want to learn, will - no matter how many obstacles are thrown in their paths.
Those who don't want to learn, won't - regardless of how much guidance they're offered.


< Message edited by Dangruscurvz -- 1/17/2010 12:07:28 AM >


_____________________________

"The journey is more important than the destination."

http://dangrus.blogspot.com/

(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 12:34:59 AM   
Cherylmazana


Posts: 1151
Joined: 10/4/2007
Status: offline
I have to admit I agree with Dangrus here, I looked in a while back and saw Kimveris post and sighed, so I planned in my head a long reply which is no longer needed, and in fact can be summed up quite simply.

Where in the books does it say a Gorean has to do what a anyone thinks is needed or indeed what anyone but they believes is right?

Personal accountability is not about doing what others think is the correct thing to do, it is about doing what you believe is the right thing to do in spite of what others say.

And lastly

I once believed that the only way to help people understand was to refute every piece of rubbish that came my way, over time I came to learn that instead of helping often feeding the monkeys just means you get back what you gave them covered in excrement instead. So if you ignore them they grow bored and go elsewhere to feed, often the best response is an empty thread.

Cheryl

(in reply to Dangruscurvz)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 6:21:18 AM   
Dinnardin


Posts: 368
Joined: 1/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dangruscurvz


Oh Kim... for Pete's sake put a cork in it.

You were lamenting? Come on. You were whining in the hopes of spurring some guilt-induced action against what you perceived as some mortal sin against the Holy Gorean Grail.

And it didn't work. So you got smacked on the nose by a couple of Gorean men. You were asking for it.

As one who's been there and done that more times than you can count, trust me. This stuff I know .

Taking responsibility - yes, it's a very important Gorean tenet,  but it doesn't mean that everyone who self-identifies as a Gorean has a built in obligation to correct every nitwit who swaggers in and announces "I fisted my girl in cage! Look at what a big Goreeeeeeeeeeean Mastah I am!"

You see complacency, I see it a little differently.

You know I spent some time reading these boards trying to figure out what all the fuss is about. (That's a couple hours of my time I'll never get back.) What astounded me is not why none of the men replied in that thread, but why anyone would.

Goreans don't like to waste our time and attention on people who have not earned it. When I read those threads, it seemed perfectly understandable to me that many wouldn't bother to reply. Because the crap and those perpetuating it did not merit the effort.

The larger Gorean expectation? Good Grief. Gor isn't our job. And we are not obligated to debunk every piece of idiocy that pops up.  We're not here to pass on all Gorean knowledge tied up in a nice, neat bow to the next generation of would-be Goreans. Nope, not our job.

If  a new person can't figure out what's true from what's BS, they haven't read enough yet.  Back to the Books.  Let them read and study and figure it out and fight for those truths like we did.  That's the Gorean Experience.

It's not a Gorean man's job to ride to the rescue every time a Free Woman gets her panties in a twist because some fool offended her. Nor do they have to answer to you or me or any woman for their choices.

As for accountability... well, Kim you have a golden opportunity to lead by example here. You irritated a couple of men here who have made it very clear that they didn't like the way you communicated your "laments." Regardless of your intent, from where I sit, I'd say it looks like you owe them an apology.

You see, that's the thing about accountability and Goreans. There's no wiggle room. Regardless of our intent, we are still responsible for the impact of our actions. You want the flaming to stop - be the one to take the first step.

I dare you.

~Dangrus


Those who want to learn, will - no matter how many obstacles are thrown in their paths.
Those who don't want to learn, won't - regardless of how much guidance they're offered.


Curvzzz....

Your mind has been missed.

John, AKA Dinnardin

(in reply to Dangruscurvz)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 6:29:42 AM   
Kimveri


Posts: 781
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline
Hello, Cheryl, Dang,

Everyone is so focused on the most recent tag-team, when they are little more than the latest example of a larger issue. Prodding for action, or bitching about why there's often not any, are not the same thing. I understand how some might see it as manipulation. I'm simply making clear such was not my intent.

I did apologize for the sweeping generalization. That was wrong of me & I owned it. I took accountability for not bringing issues as I see them to the notice of those who I'd hope to act. If that's not enough, then perhaps the hide button would work? It works immensely well for me. ;-)

I find it convenient that my contrition was missed, but I expect no less from my long-standing detractors. I actually appreciate their consistency. At the least, in the shifting, situational 'ethics' & 'standards' of online Gor, they remain the same! :-D

Good day, ladies,

~Kimveri


< Message edited by Kimveri -- 1/17/2010 6:30:00 AM >


_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to Cherylmazana)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 6:32:02 AM   
nephandi


Posts: 3930
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Greetings

I think that women tend to manipulate more often than men do. This have to do with women often valuing the group harmony so much that to directly go in and demand things to become the way she want it often seams wrong. Sometimes that manipulation is quite friendly, like with Aswad, neither him nor me is really that healthy with what we eat, and he is the one that usually cook, but if I cook something with vegetables he will eat it instead of making something else for himself.. In a way this is a kind of manipulation, but it is a friendly one.

However the way women talk, even amongst ourself can lead men to think we are trying to manipulate them, when in case we are not. Women tend to say things in the nicest way possible, and to move around in circles around what they really want, instead of just coming out to say it. This often annoy men to no end. But it is not manipulation, for women understand what it is we are saying to one another, it is just when there comes a man involved that there are problems. Sometimes it seams like men and women speak different languages. Let me make an example.

Our best friend often comes over to our house to play games. Now he have a lady in his life and when he leaves he often asks her if it is okey that he leaves that evening. Now if his lady had planned a romantic dinner, or just did not want to be alone, she says something like this. Fine, just go. And then expect her man to understand from her tone of voice that it is not really ok, while at the same time avoiding being demanding, the desired effect is that he is to say, are you sure, and then they will go a bit back and forth until he agrees to stay home without her asking for it. Now men see this as manipulation, but in my experience it is not, it is just the way many woman communicate, in a very non assertive way.

Man's way to communicate: I want beef and mashed potatoes for dinner to day.
Woman's way to communicate: Honey, is it not long since he had beef and mushed potatoes? Perhaps we should have that one day soon?

In Norway we have a saying, walking around the porridge, it means to hint and to speak around something instead of going at it directly. And woman very often communicate like that, and then expect men to understand us.

But as for direct manipulation. I think that is also more accepted among women than among men. Look for example at a girl and a boy being insulted. The boy will attack and fight the one insulting him, or at least directly insult him back. Girls will giggle it away and then manipulate events to get revenge. Off course this not not always the case. With my grandmother and grandfather, she was the one with the reins who controlled things in the household and got straight to the chase, while he held back and manipulated things. But generally women walk more around the porridge, setting up things in their favor instead of going at it directly, while men say directly what they want and take direct steps to get it.

I wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to Cherylmazana)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 6:42:01 AM   
Louve00


Posts: 1526
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cherylmazana

I once believed that the only way to help people understand was to refute every piece of rubbish that came my way, over time I came to learn that instead of helping often feeding the monkeys just means you get back what you gave them covered in excrement instead. So if you ignore them they grow bored and go elsewhere to feed, often the best response is an empty thread.

Cheryl



For me, its not so much a matter of ignoring them, its a matter of realizing they aren't of the same mentality as I.  You waste your time going 'round and 'round, trying to convince them of your ideas, while they insist on their ideas.  Just a big waste of time.  I've learned that people are going to believe what they believe...right or wrong...sensible or not.  And its unlikely you're going to change it.  We all have it within our power to drop or leave any mentality we believe in or not.  In other words....choose your battles wisely. 

As far as manipulation.  It is what it is.  You can point your finger at it all you want.  Being wise enough to know what it is IS all you need to know.  Proceeding from there determines whether you will or won't be.  But calling someone out on being manipulative changes nothing.  Just, perhaps, makes the one accusing feel better for letting everyone know they know what manipulation is?

 

_____________________________

For the great majority of mankind are satisfied with appearance, as though they were realities and are often more influenced by the things that seem than by those that are. - Niccolo Machiavelli

(in reply to Cherylmazana)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 7:51:01 AM   
Cherylmazana


Posts: 1151
Joined: 10/4/2007
Status: offline
Hi Kimveri

It’s ok that you can’t let a subject drop, that’s ok I tend to be that way myself, a lot of people are, but sometimes you do yourself more damage by continuing than you do by simply walking away.

I tried to put it politely but I am going to do you the favor of believing you are not a monkey and instead put it bluntly and straight.

You are acting like a mother telling her kids what to do, and then acting all disappointed when they don’t, the problem with that is men are not kids no matter how much they exasperate us and deliberately act that way (often to wind us up) and you are beating a horse that’s already been declared dead and worthless.

So its pissing you off that the men didn’t immediately run to do your bidding, well tough life isn’t always the way you want it to be, and unless you are a Dominatrix in a sub male gathering it’s likely that men won’t do what you think they should and instead go their own sweet way. After all isn’t that what Gorean women say they want?

Or is it ok for men to be men only when they are the type of men you want them to be?

Cheryl

(in reply to Louve00)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 7:58:45 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 6362
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cherylmazana

I once believed that the only way to help people understand was to refute every piece of rubbish that came my way, over time I came to learn that instead of helping often feeding the monkeys just means you get back what you gave them covered in excrement instead. So if you ignore them they grow bored and go elsewhere to feed, often the best response is an empty thread.

A lot of truth in that. I've often felt conflicted between ignoring someone, and rebutting their nonsense if only for the sake of that part of the non-Gorean audience which might really have no idea. But on the one hand that gets old, and on the other hand we have abundant recent evidence that there will always be some responders who continue to extend such threads. So I sometimes turn to a third option.

No dignity, no learning, no force of character, can make any stand against good wit. ~Ralph Waldo Emerson

Add "affectation of" after each "no". I can't say that it's always any more effective in the final analysis. But it's a lot less frustrating, and sometimes it provokes a response that pretty much seals the case.

K.




< Message edited by Kirata -- 1/17/2010 8:38:22 AM >

(in reply to Cherylmazana)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 1:48:24 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 3072
Joined: 6/30/2008
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dangruscurvz


 What astounded me is not why none of the men replied in that thread, but why anyone would.

 


that was my feeling exactly....altho i mostly lurk, and probably am ignored when i do comment because i have a sense of humor that may not make sense in the typed word (or hell any word to some-lol).

i read this forun a good bit, and i admit it makes me think a lot and sometimes shake my head.  i have come to respect the opinions of several on here, even when what they say goes against what i find to be true.

but "that" thread changed my mind about several-some for the better and some for the worst.  while i am sure no gorean cares what my opinion is, i wanted to say that sometimes sitting back and doing nothing is the right thing to do.  the old give them enough rope and they will hang their self thing yanno.

may we all find our bliss
'

_____________________________

Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue. Realize the strength; move on. ~Henry Rollins


We don't remember days, we remember moments.
Cesar Pavese

Talk to me in 20 years.

(in reply to Dangruscurvz)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 3:07:43 PM   
nephandi


Posts: 3930
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Greetings

quote:

Meanwhile, some of the reactions are confusing. It’s stated that women are manipulative because we are ‘without influence &/or power unless men decide to give us some’. How does this fit with the idea of personal merit or responsibility? Does this mean when a man does acknowledge a woman’s influence that she hasn’t earned it? She doesn’t merit it through her own actions, rather it is merely a gift of his magnanimity?


I think that a woman is not so powerless as some men like to think. I know many will disagree with me on this, but be that as it may. In the Gor books society protects men's rights to rule over women, but without that support from the law, women are not powerless, even if we usually have less power than men. However manipulation is closer to how most women communicates, more beating around the bush instead of going directly at what one want. I personally do not agree with those who seam to think that a man, any man should rule over a woman, any woman no matter that woman's merit or accomplishments, just based on the power of the penis.

I however also think that for a woman, the ones who manage to be taken seriously be men and seen as equals are the ones who do not need manipulation, and those women to see what they want and challenge the world for it and stand her own ground until she get it.

quote:

Incidents like the stranger who posted on a thread about citizenship (pretty sacred to  Goreans), stated that submissive females can’t keep their legs together & therefore can’t be good citizens.


Well I am submissive, free or slave there is no denying that fact, but I am not easy. However even if I was. This always make me wonder. If a woman who sleeps with many men are not good citizens, what then about men who can not keep her little friends in their pants? Are they unfit citizen to? And if not, if this is only apply to women, what is it about female sexuality which makes a woman unfit to be a citizen. This is a side topic off course, but I have always wondered why being a slut is negative for women but positive for men.

quote:

Perhaps, instead of flaming each other, we might discuss why these sorts of things go unaddressed, the posters not held accountable at all?


I think that if we women want such behavior addressed, then we have to address it ourselves. I once met a free man on another forum. I had told a slave that her extremely rude behavior which her Master allowed made me discredit her Master as a Gorean. This particular free man on the forum went ballistic, saying that free women where unimportant and the only thing important was slaves and that he would like to face strip me and well...he was rather rude. I told him to come try it and made it very clear I would do him bodily harm if he tried to near me, after that he never said a word more to me, and the tread as far as I know was laid to rest. If we want rude behavior towards us to stop, we need to stop it ourselves.

And while I might have gone of topic or misunderstood your post, yes I think the issues you rise are well worth discussing.

I wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Manipulation? - 1/17/2010 8:49:58 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 6618
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

I'll go over this again in hopes to help the process of understanding in as much as I feel compelled to.


Thank you. I appreciate that.

quote:

I don't believe I implied I had no responsibility in watching out for those individuals that I feel are imparting a negative influence on a subject matter I hold dear.


Ah. Mea culpa. It is much clearer now. See, I had erroneously read precisely that implication into your reply.

quote:

Did my calling her on an activity I found less than appropriate offend you?


Not at all.

quote:

So what's with your rant over my actions?


As you're fond of pointing out, sometimes it is not what, but how, which is the crux of the matter.

quote:

So you are ranting or complaining over men doing as they believed they should have.


No swinging swords here. I'm not so quick to draw one as all that. Insofar as the hand might be said to rest on the hilt, it is not men doing as they believe to be right that is the cause of any itching fingers, but rather the manner in which they did it. Let's compare it to a beheading. If one were carried out with a sword, I might note that a beheading was appropriate, and note that one was indeed carried out, yet still tell you that I found fault with how you handled the sword if your balance was off, or the stance lax. Any of those complaints are irrelevant to a headsman. But all of them are relevant to a swordsman.

My failure to read humorous intent in your reply would seem to be the most relevant fault on my end. Now, you pointed out that you do not desire feedback, so now that I have explained the reasons for my inquiries, I am done with this. Also, you know that I know that you hold yourself to your own standard, and that what standard I have come to expect from you is consequently irrelevant. Hence, I do not know why you would comment on that, even with sarcasm. Not that it matters.

Health,
al-Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 31
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles >> RE: Manipulation? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2012
Collarchat.com is a member of the Free Speech Coalition
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.359