|
tazzygirl -> RE: ACORN pimp gets busted! (1/30/2010 5:01:12 PM)
|
lol... anyone else.. especially with democratic ties.. who tried this with a republican senator would have been strung up to hang. This is such a joke! He enters a senators office, plays around with phone lines, admits he had intentions of interrupting the service there to "prove" there was nothing tying them up, and he got caught...
yes, lets pat him on the head, smile and whisper.. now be a good boy, k?
but... just out of curiosity...isnt one of the fellas with him is the son of a US district attorney?
According to the affidavit by Steven Rayes of the FBI...
http://www.politico.com/static/PPM145_new_012610.html
They were in violation of the US Code, Title 18, section 1036, 1362 and 2
1036
§ 1036. Entry by false pretenses to any real property, vessel, or aircraft of the United States or secure area of any airport or seaport
How Current is This? (a) Whoever, by any fraud or false pretense, enters or attempts to enter—
(1) any real property belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;
(2) any vessel or aircraft belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;
(3) any secure or restricted area of any seaport, designated as secure in an approved security plan, as required under section 70103 of title 46, United States Code, and the rules and regulations promulgated under that section; or
(4) any secure area of any airport,
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is—
(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if the offense is committed with the intent to commit a felony; or
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both, in any other case.
(c) As used in this section—
(1) the term “secure area” means an area access to which is restricted by the airport authority, captain of the seaport, or a public agency; and
(2) the term “airport” has the meaning given such term in section 47102 of title 49.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001036----000-.html
1362
§ 1362. Communication lines, stations or systems
How Current is This? Whoever willfully or maliciously injures or destroys any of the works, property, or material of any radio, telegraph, telephone or cable, line, station, or system, or other means of communication, operated or controlled by the United States, or used or intended to be used for military or civil defense functions of the United States, whether constructed or in process of construction, or willfully or maliciously interferes in any way with the working or use of any such line, or system, or willfully or maliciously obstructs, hinders, or delays the transmission of any communication over any such line, or system, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
In the case of any works, property, or material, not operated or controlled by the United States, this section shall not apply to any lawful strike activity, or other lawful concerted activities for the purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual aid and protection which do not injure or destroy any line or system used or intended to be used for the military or civil defense functions of the United States.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1362.html
Section 2
Under criminal law, a principal is any actor who is primarily responsible for a criminal offense.[1] Such an actor is distinguished from others who may also be subject to criminal liability as accomplices, accessories or conspirators.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_(criminal_law)
Taking into consideration that these are not stupid men, that they are all in college, with what has been described as exceptional intelligence, this was a very stupid move. And, even if they do get off, can anyone truly say they have not broken the federal laws here with their admitted actions?
|
|
|
|
