barelynangel
Posts: 6233
Status: offline
|
So i take it she either hid her profile or she deleted it as its not found anymore. Lord love the faint of heart. This isn't to me about a slave having loyalty. Its about why slave's exist as well slaves. They exist because some need is demanding to be fed and they seek it until it starts being fed. As long as that need is being fed than all is well. If a woman decides to STAY with a Man out of loyalty, then how is that in any way being a slave -- to me that is being self-determining which is what FW do. A slave has some responsibility to stay with a Man whom is the facade of a Master to her? She has some responsibility to hold herself in slavery for a Man incapable of doing so? Umm no. Sorry that is way to complex for what slavery is. If you are his wife or have kids with him okay maybe -- but that is beyond the scope of slavery. IF that is why they stay with one man instead of following their reactions and instincts to another, than that is self-determined. HOWEVER, most men who own slaves do so by HOLDING the slave. The leash she is on through his mastery and enslavement will overcome most of her urges to follow another, why? Because she is being fed in the mastery of her current owner. Yeah, sorry folks, slavery is not a til death do us part sentiment. While its nice to strive for, the concept doesn't belong in slavery of Gorean. Why? Because to achieve same because of that sentiment, a self-determination of the woman then comes into play. And there is a determination of compromise that she must adhere to because of some concept of loyalty. NOW, do many slaves feel loyalty to their owners -- yep. BUT if that is what is KEEPING HER as his slave when her reaction is to follow another, to me its re-evaluation time because its HER holding herself to him. Slaves don't have honor, not in the concept many want to place upon this concept. A slave does not have the freedom to DEFINE what she lives by and therefore, she does not have the ability because she doens't have the freedom to adhere to a concept of honor. She is a slave. To try and place HONOR upon a slave is to me someone who is too afraid of slavery and want the slave to maintain the concept of FW. Honor needs self-determination and the freedom to execute the determinations of self. Sorry, within GOR, a slave doesn't have that ability. Yeah it kinda sucks and seems wrong to many, but if you understand slave within the concept of Gorean, this would not seem wrong but simply what is based on the slavery. A slave knows what she deems right from wrong, a slave is usually intelligent enough to determine same. These have no bearing on the concept of honor or loyalty. There is no right or wrong for a woman who is slave to STAY with a Man who cannot hold her in his mastery. TO ME, its wrong for her to remain and use herself to hold herself in slavery to a Man incapable of doing so. Those slaves who are firmly held, who are snug in their figurative leashes -- have no need to worry about figuring out if she should be loyal to her Master or honorable in remaining -- she doesn't have to think that hard for her Master has already set the environment and atmosphere wherein she simply is held by him and HIS determinations for her -- not someone elses for her. No honor or loyalty needed. Its really that simple. The complexity comes in when people try and place FREE concept on slaves and try and make situations as the OP stated into a concept SLAVES DON'T DEAL WITHIN. Sometimes people make slavery so damn complicated with trying to make sure women who are slaves have the dignity of concepts like honor and loyalty, when in fact they don't. But gee we really don't want to see slaves to be that way. We want to make sure they have all the attributes FW live within because it gives the slave some pride in our society. This issue has nothing to do with the slave but is an issue between Men -- one an owner, one who wants to own. angel
< Message edited by barelynangel -- 2/9/2010 3:49:44 PM >
_____________________________
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. R.W. Emerson
|