CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3650
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
As Master, I am going to have to settle conflicts before they get out of control and one or the other is stomping out of the relationship. I'd like to comment very briefly on this sentence. It's been my experience, over the years, that unless the individuals who are conflicted between themselves are unable to work through the situation on their own, or cannot come up with a viable compromise, it is better, as a Keeper, to... if you'll pardon the pun keep my nose out of it. Usually, the people in conflict can work through the situation on their own, given time and incentive. If I intervene before that happens, I end up having to intervene in every little glitch that comes down the pike (and trust me -- with more people, there are exponentially greater possibilities for "glitchiness"). I would refrain from 'settling' any conflicts except for those in which the involved parties are unable to settle on their own-- it may well save your sanity. In terms of whether the 3rd person is expendable in order to resolve issues, I -never- consider my companions, on any side of the kneel, to be "expendable" -- however, sometimes people need to take a break to get their heads together... so once you're family with the House, if you need to take some alone-time, or want to explore other options, that doesn't mean you're not family and can't come home later, once you know what you want... or can't be family at a distance, if it turns out that collective living just doesn't work for you. As long as a person has invested in the family, they -are- family. There is one exception to this rule that we abide by without fail, though. If, in the process of sorting things out, one individual -intentionally- damages either another member of the family or the family as a whole, through action or inaction, through active deceit or failure to disclose, or brings damaging conflict into the household, with no thought of the problems it would cause in the House -- they're gone, stripped of their Family associations, and will not be welcomed into the house again, even as a distant associate or "friend of a friend". These decisions are made by our House Council (because we're such a large and diverse group, with in-house members and members-at-large to consider), and input is accepted and considered by everyone in the House -- no matter the side if the kneel. The decision is final and banishment is not subject to appeal. We have no mercy and do not forgive when people intentionally set out to inflict harm. We've only had -two- of these situations in the 13 years that I've been with the House, and we do our darndest to make sure that those are the -only- two... but we also recognize that, human nature being what it is, we're likely to have to deal with the scenario again, so we have a plan in place. Calla
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 3/3/2010 1:55:56 PM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|