nephandi
Posts: 3930
Joined: 9/23/2005 From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen! Status: offline
|
Greetings quote:
To nephandi, GM I think Norman's issues comes from how he writes about the subject. You can tell it is very personal to him. Some authors write some authors write from their soul- he was one of them. Really for the Gor books, except for the philosophy bits seams to be to be rather typical trashy 1960's swords and spaceships science fiction. But let us assume Norman lay his heart and soul in the writing, do that mean that every author that do that mean what he writes about is right? Take my favorite fantasy author Robert Jordan. The man cared about his books, allot. I mean he was dying from a rather nasty form of cancer and he kept writing, when he understood he had only days left to live he gathered his wife and his agent and told them the rest of the story so they could be sure his fantasy series where completed. The man where dedicated. Now Robert Jordan wrote a series of fantasy books named Wheel of Time and there happens some seriously fucked up shit there. We have rape, torture, conquest of other nations, enslavement, soul sucking vampires, betrayal, murder the list go on and on, mention something terrible and you can be sure it happens to some character in these books. Do you think that Robert Jordan thought all these things where great, he was pro murder, enslavement and soul sucking? Or let us take Bram Stoker you can not say Dracula is not written with both skill and soul, and yet we have a list of horrible things a mile long, among them rape, do you think Bram Stoker where pro rape and had a problem with women Because Dracula rape, suck the blood of, kills and makes a vampire out of Lucy? I could go on and on with authors who have put everything into their books and written masterworks but where horrible things happen, that however do not make them horrible people themselves. Shakespeare did probably not approve of teenage suicide, Arthur Conan Doyle probably did not think murder where justified. Mary Shelly where not as far as we know big into grave robbing, Tolkien where not know for his love of torture, C.S Lewis probably did not think luring children into your lair with candy and enslaving them where a good idea. And so on and so on. Yes Norman write about rape and enslavement of women, that do not mean he have a problem with women or want to rape women or that he thinks what happens in his books would be a good idea. quote:
As for him condoning rape...I know I didn't make this statement. So I won't answer it, but I will say rape is never about sex and all about power & control. Especially in real life. So you really think every rapist have the same motivation? There is absolutely no shred of evidence for your statement, it is tossed around like truth but it is refuted again and again, by study after study. There are interviews with rapists, there is common sense, but oh no let us not question this statement because off course every rapist think the same. quote:
In fantasy- force sex has rules and safewords. Real rape doesn't. Slave rape would probably fall in the category of control because a kajira can protest all she wants- she is going to get raped. It is called slave rape because in the books a slave can not give consent as she have no say in her life, making sex with her rape. It is not about control or not control, it is about the owner of a slave taking what he want for whatever reason, usually his own sexual pleasure and the slave not having anything to say in whatever it is done or not. I wish you well
_____________________________
Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad
|