sirssubk2008 -> RE: Male vs. Female Dominance (My 1st thread) (5/28/2011 11:30:56 AM)
|
Hi Heather, nice topic choice[;)] I agree with you to a point. I agree that men's dominance may have a more physical element to it, I'm not sure that I agree that it's because of of their strength. I wonder how much of that stems from the fact that men are more visually stimulated than women and therefore, the sight of a particular act or position actually turns on the mental side of their dominance. For me at least, I don't look at the physical strength of a partner because it's all about the mental. If a Dom can't turn on my mental submissiveness, then I don't care if they can pick up a loaded F-250, there is no way I could submit to them. I'm not sure if that makes any sense to you, but I can't figure out another way to word it. quote:
Take for example rimjobs. I'm pretty sure most would consider this a very submissive act, and few would consider it dominant in any way (if they'd even consider doing it), and I agree, when I do it, I am put into a very submissive headspace. To her it is a very dominant thing to do, to have me do it to her. But it works the other way around too, when I am flipped over and tongued just because she wants to, well I feel very submissive, and quite dirty for "allowing" it. So, from this, its clear that the same act can be both dominant and submissive, it depends on the reason for the act and how it is done. I agree that alot of times the same act can be both dominant and submissive. Another point in favor of mental versus physical, if a Dom/Domme can make you enter the proper headspace, they can accomplish much more than just using physical dominance.
|
|
|
|