SixMore2Go
Posts: 190
Joined: 7/1/2009 Status: offline
|
Ah I understand now, I see where we differ. You, to my mind, have fallen into the all too common error of mistaking the tale for the message. The ethical systems portrayed in the books is not intended to be a model to be emulated, but rather as an example of how such an ethical system could have developed given the underlying individualism of the philosophy. The concentric nature of the ethical system is truly only applicable to the society for which it was invented. Now, it can be used as an example, but it is not a model, attempting to adapt it to this world, is fruitless, as it simply was never intended for such. It is just a literary device to make the imaginary more real. Too many, again, in my mind, fall prey to this. They forget that as well as having a philosophical message, the books are primarily literature, albeit not overly well executed literature, designed to entertain. Now, in order to do that, the reader must be able to suspend his disbelief, and in order for the reader to be able to do so, the tale must have a consistency, it must be, for the most part believable, so that the truly fantastic aspects can be accepted. And that is the purpose of the vast majority of the culture of Gor described in the books. The society of Gor described in the books is but only incidental to the philosophy, it is not Norman's idea of the ideal society, it is but his idea of a society that could develop under his overarching philosophy.
_____________________________
|