Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: home birth in chains


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: home birth in chains Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 3:04:27 AM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

my general feeling is "the woman who's pushing a watermelon out of her fucking body gets to be chained if she fucking wants to".


Damn right. It's her body, right?

Oh! It's a watermelon! I thought we were talking about a baby...

Never mind.

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 3:06:02 AM   
thursdays


Posts: 143
Joined: 7/28/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

my general feeling is "the woman who's pushing a watermelon out of her fucking body gets to be chained if she fucking wants to".


Damn right. It's her body, right?

Oh! It's a watermelon! I thought we were talking about a baby...

Never mind.


I think it was more of a metaphor!

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 5:41:50 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I disagree.
I've many many times see kinksters use chains with carabiners and eye hook clasps.

Even if you were worried he might use locks, it is more productive to point other options out to him, than to chastise him about how dangerous the lock you don't even know if he was planning to use might be.


Which I did.

quote:

And as a nurse I wouldn't expect you to do anything less than point out potential dangers... but I consider it more productive to point out various alternatives he may use to make the situation safer, instead of chastising the all the possible options he may choose to use when possibly unaware of other options.


How about scarves around her wrists and ankles to simulate bondage?
How about he hold them himself?
How about just leather cuffs with no metal attachments?

There are many options. Had he truly been interested, he would have asked about other options.

I went with worse case since he brought up shackles here and gave him the acceptable hospital option of soft restraints so that IF medical personnel were called in, the questions would be lessened a bit.

The part I am waiting to hear is how, in the middle of all the pain, the pushing, the noise of chains, ect, she suddenly turns "Exorcist woman", grabs his balls and tells him "Get these fucking chains off me NOW!"

But, of course, we wont hear about that because the slaviest slave of the year wouldnt do that, would she.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 9:18:12 AM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
Congrats on the Newborn grandkid, I have seen a number of deliveries, including my own son, and every one, as rough as some of them were, is a miracle:)

I have training, and have assisted in a childbirth and done one myself (not claiming I am otherwise that well trained, just from first aid training on a rescue squad). I have to say, while I respect the right of someone to do what makes them feel comfortable, I would be concerned about having the chains on, too, strictly from a safety standpoint. If the midwife is okay with it, they are in charge, and I would never second guess someone like that, talking about myself. While generally, with the kind of pre-natal exams they do these days, there is a pretty strong indicator if a childbirth is going to have issues and where home childbirth is not as much of a risk as it might have been years ago, there is still always the possibility of something going wrong. When my sweetie was in labor, we were in a birthing room, and every time she started to push, the babies heartrate fell, which is not a good sign. Eventually, she was moved to a delivery room and they had a decision to make when they found the cord was wrapped around his neck, whether to do s C section or a low forceps delivery, both posed risks where he was located at the time. When they decided my wife was in distress, it was incredible how fast they moved, it was mind boggling (and me struggling to get into my scrubs) and how fast it happened (ended up low forceps, it was scary as hell because his first APGAR was a 1, after a team of pediatricians worked on him, his second was a 10...and he is a very tall,healthy young man, going to college in the fall:).

The point is that risk is always there, and if homebirthing, I assume something can go wrong and make sure nothing stops steps needed to let is happen (that on top of the usual during childbirth, the mom moving, getting her to stand up, go into certain positons, and yes, her potentially thrashing, too....). From what I know of homebirths, midwives have emergency plans, they have some local hospital or birthing center on call, a doctor they can get fast and so forth, with plans to transport the patient if need be. It just seems to be that full born chains would be in the way, and might take precious time to get rid of if things go wrong. You can put quick release on standard chains, to, have them tied on with thread that can be ripped away fast, but soft restraints might be better anyway IMO......again, talking as myself only on the safety issue, based on my (admitted) limited experience and so forth.


As far as kids being exposed to different things, when it comes to any aspects of sexuality, I am of the school that if the kid accidentally sees something, that it isn't going to hurt them, this crap about everything is going to hurt children is idiotic, and it is has hurt kids in some ways (there is evidence, for example, that these days, kids aren't exposed to germs and such early in their lives, that parents keep them 'sterile' in the idea that is healthier, and as a result, the allergies and asthma rates may be indicative of kids immune systems not building right......). So know if the kid sees mommy and daddy having sex or whatever, it isn't bad.

Nudity isn't the same as sexuality (which is part of the problem in this country, the puritan ideas of the filthiness of the body, combined with the prudish nature of the Catholic Church that formed here, warped people), and there are a lot of people who are nude around their kids. You go to nudist parks, nude beaches (happens to be there is a neat nude beach here in NJ), and it is no big deal, because people don't make a big deal about it. Guys despite popular myth don't go around erect, people simply are there in their full glory. You see it all, attractive people, older, middle aged people with more then a few extra pounds, you name it, and it is no big deal. The whole sexualization nonsense with nudity is overblown, if a kid sees a mom suckling her son, it is natural, it is prurient like the fucktards think who get upset with mom's nursing in public.

On the other hand, I do think exposure to sex and sexuality, which BD/SM play is part of, is inappropriate for young kids, because they simply can't process what it is. If a young kid sees their mom nude, and ask what her breasts are, you can tell her that is how babies are fed; if they ask about her vagina, you can tell her that is part of how kids come about (without going further), and a penis is part of that, too, and leave it at that. I think that exposure to it causes problems, and I have seen the result of it up close and personal. My son went to a private school, talking the kind of place where the tuition in grade school was >20k (where we could scrape that up, but barely), and the kids there were unbelievably fucked up. Families wee well off, they went to switzerland for winter break to go skiing, etc.......by the time they were in 4th or 5th grade, these kids were hypersexualized, shockingly so, the girls were wearing stuff they shouldn't have been, padded bras, makeup, clothing that would be called 'junior slutwear' and the like, the boys were saying and doing things they obviously knew nothing about, like talking about feeling up girlfriends.. (how do I know? because we had to answer our son's questions about what he heard....btw neither I nor my sweetie are prudes or puritans, we have talked about sex with our son from the time he was old enough to start understanding, in age appropriate fashion)..some of it was vile, like a boy grabbing my sons nipple area and twisting them...that is not normal 10 year old behavior, even these days. I am pretty certain I understand why, these kids had cell phones with text on them (before smartphones), they had computers in their own rooms with no kind of controls on them, probably had cable tv in their bedrooms with open boxes on them (their parents were that clueless), and they were exposed to crap they shouldn't be. On the other hand, when my son moved to another school for middle school, the kids were pretty normal, as I remembered them.

With the OP, I am not sure seeing mommy wearing chains would be an issue (and I say that genuinely, I don't know). I would probably not do it in my own life, being cautious, but I also respect other's rights to live as they wish. What I would recommend to someone is to talk to a professional, one who is kink aware, about what they thought, and maybe could suggest ways that the wife could feel what she wished to feel while minimizing risk for the kid..and yes, they exist:). I am sensitive to this, because I went through this when I was in transition, and it was more and more evident that a)I was changing and b)I was spending more time as Lauren, and there had to be a time when our S was told. Conventional wisdom would be that he would be scarred, seeing his dad changing, and so forth...on the other hand it was happening, and we were a family....and the point is, I worked with a therapist (obviously), and we did it in an age appropriate way..and he survived (and also survived when I through a series of circumstances had to revert back......). So I understand what it is like to balance out things like my needs versus a childs.

One thing we did tell our son that might help the OP, and that is we were clear with him once he knew about me that it was something not to be talked about outside our family, not because it was shameful, but because others don't necessarily understand and such. Our S was older when the time came, 6 or 7, so it was different then little kids.....but if I was to give advice on that, assuming the OP's wife needs that, then it would be to deal with it in an age appropriate way. I wouldn't explain about how to mommy that showed her loyalty to daddy or anything complicated, simply say that mommy likes to wear those, that it makes her feel better or some such (like I said, a kink aware professional may be better at this). I wouldn't make a big deal about it, and if you tell the kids they shouldn't talk about it with outsiders, don't make it "we don't talk about that to outside people because they will do bad things" and the like, simply tell them that all families have things that are important to them and are no one else's business. If your child has something that is their secret, like a 'secret friend', tell them it is like that.......if you make it all hush hush and somber, the kid is going to pick up that and it will be the first thing they want to blab, if you make it in the realm of it is a family thing, and don't make it seem like the end of the world, they will accept it, least based on my experience.

All I can hope for and wish is that the child is healthy and happy, after that, it is all up to the OP and his family:)

< Message edited by njlauren -- 3/23/2013 9:19:49 AM >

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 11:19:50 AM   
searching4mysir


Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline
quote:

combined with the prudish nature of the Catholic Church that formed here


Considering all the nude artwork, the Catholic Church could hardly be considered prudes.

_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 5:32:49 PM   
SacredDepravity


Posts: 270
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

As far as showing her submissiveness, I think that happens in many ways all the time.


In my opinion, the best way to show it is simply... Yes Master.


Amen!

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 6:54:21 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The part I am waiting to hear is how, in the middle of all the pain, the pushing, the noise of chains, ect, she suddenly turns "Exorcist woman", grabs his balls and tells him "Get these fucking chains off me NOW!"



If she's anything like me, I don't think that will happen. And that's got nothing to do with being the "slaviest slave" but everything to do with the fact that bondage -any bondage- centers me, calms me down, soothes me, and makes me feel better.
The pressure, and confinement is reassuring to me. The "noise" of the chains that several people on this tread have commented about relaxes me. I've slept in chains often, as well as used them extensively during the day, and I've never even considered the idea that the rattle of a chain could register as "noise" to anybody. It registers as quite the opposite to me.

Have you ever heard of Temple Grandin's hug machine? Bondage has a similar effect on me.

Had I thought about the idea of using bondage during delivery, I would have used it myself. I'm absolutely sure that it would have made me feel tons better. And that's got nothing to do with "slaviness" or submission even, but everything with how bondage by itself affects my headspace.

_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 7:10:21 PM   
calamitysandra


Posts: 1682
Joined: 3/17/2006
Status: offline
While I would not want to be restraint from moving freely during labour in any way, I believe it is possible to do so safely.

Most important would be the ability to get the restraints of immediately. A good deal of options fo that have already been pointed out.
Heeding the advice of your midwife during labour is also crucial. If she wants the mother to move around, the restraints have to come of, if she is happy about it or not.
If you have chosen your midwife well, I do not really see a problem.

Now, one thing I wonder about is a possible negative psychological feedback if her restraints have to come of during birth. If she is as attached to them and their symbolism in your relationship as wanting to wear them during childbirth implies, how is she going to feel if they need to be removed. Will the distraction from that have a negative impact on the rest of her labour or even longer?
I think you need to discuss how you will deal with the possibility of her "dream delivery" evaporating mid-labor. But that is something every pregnant woman should spend time thinking about. While it might not be giving birth in chains, going from the planned, drug free water birth to emergency c-section has thrown more than one woman for a loop.


Wearing chains around the kids is an iffy subject. While I do feel it can be explained to children in a way that will not cause trauma, I do see some risk should CPS or the police become involved.
But being chained is not being chained. While dragging a heavy, rusty, and short chain around with her is in no way safe, I can not really see the problem if it is a rather delicate chain, long enough to not hinder her movement in any way if she wears it bound up with a shawl as the op states.


There was something else in this thread that made me do a double take though.
While there is often put emphasis on the point that "the lifestyle" is not solely about sex, as soon as something happens that a majority does not agree with, in this case the OPs wife wearing chains, many people assume that the act they do not agree with is about sex, about somebody getting their jollies.
Funny how the mind seems to go: I think this is bad/wrong, so it has to be about sex.
As I said, wearing the chains around the kids is iffy, but I do not see anything that would lead me to assume that she is doing so for sexual reasons.


< Message edited by calamitysandra -- 3/23/2013 7:17:44 PM >


_____________________________

"Whenever people are laughing, they are generally not killing one another"
Alan Alda


(in reply to SacredDepravity)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 8:12:03 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

combined with the prudish nature of the Catholic Church that formed here


Considering all the nude artwork, the Catholic Church could hardly be considered prudes.


Really? First of all, I was talking about the US Catholic Church, which in many ways adopted the prudishness of the puritans and ran with it. If you think the church is somehow enlightened on the human body I suggest you do a little search about the church and smut, including insisting that statues have their 'naughty bits' covered up, or censoring movies or art they considered 'scandalous'...look up a gentleman by the name of Anthony Comstock, and see to what levels the church stooped to, it isn't exactly an enlightened position..and the church today is not exactly a paradigm of enlightened sexuality, their basic teaching on sex is that it is about producing babies, despite all the flowery language they have put around it.

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 8:41:35 PM   
searching4mysir


Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

combined with the prudish nature of the Catholic Church that formed here


Considering all the nude artwork, the Catholic Church could hardly be considered prudes.


Really? First of all, I was talking about the US Catholic Church, which in many ways adopted the prudishness of the puritans and ran with it. If you think the church is somehow enlightened on the human body I suggest you do a little search about the church and smut, including insisting that statues have their 'naughty bits' covered up, or censoring movies or art they considered 'scandalous'...look up a gentleman by the name of Anthony Comstock, and see to what levels the church stooped to, it isn't exactly an enlightened position..and the church today is not exactly a paradigm of enlightened sexuality, their basic teaching on sex is that it is about producing babies, despite all the flowery language they have put around it.



It isn't nudity that the Church has a problem with. It is the dehumanization and objectification that it has a problem with. The Catholic Church believes that contraception objectifies human beings and dehumanizes them. That's why they had issues with Comstock.

Sex IS about producing the next generation of the human race. Duh! That's why it is called sexual reproduction. That isn't its ONLY purpose (nor does the Catholic Church claim that it is...otherwise they would insist people stop having sex after menopause), but it, biologically speaking, IS the main purpose.

< Message edited by searching4mysir -- 3/23/2013 8:44:24 PM >


_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM


(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 8:55:16 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

And I'm also curious as to what will happen when the kids mention that mommy's chained up all day. Highly inappropriate.


I imagine the kindergarten teacher or some other parent making a phone call to CPS is what will happen. I doubt that a consensual relationship involving "unconventional jewelry" that don't impede her from doing her parental duty is something that would actually result in OP losing the kids for good. But I could see the investigation being an uncomfortable hassle, and maybe the kids being temporarily put in foster care.

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 9:06:05 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir
but it, biologically speaking, IS the main purpose.

Well yeah. But in that same vein "reproduction" is the purpose for life. It isn't just sex. "Breathing" would count also.


_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 9:09:14 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren


quote:

ORIGINAL: searching4mysir

quote:

combined with the prudish nature of the Catholic Church that formed here


Considering all the nude artwork, the Catholic Church could hardly be considered prudes.


Really? First of all, I was talking about the US Catholic Church, which in many ways adopted the prudishness of the puritans and ran with it. If you think the church is somehow enlightened on the human body I suggest you do a little search about the church and smut, including insisting that statues have their 'naughty bits' covered up, or censoring movies or art they considered 'scandalous'...look up a gentleman by the name of Anthony Comstock, and see to what levels the church stooped to, it isn't exactly an enlightened position..and the church today is not exactly a paradigm of enlightened sexuality, their basic teaching on sex is that it is about producing babies, despite all the flowery language they have put around it.



It isn't nudity that the Church has a problem with. It is the dehumanization and objectification that it has a problem with. The Catholic Church believes that contraception objectifies human beings and dehumanizes them. That's why they had issues with Comstock.

Sex IS about producing the next generation of the human race. Duh! That's why it is called sexual reproduction. That isn't its ONLY purpose (nor does the Catholic Church claim that it is...otherwise they would insist people stop having sex after menopause), but it, biologically speaking, IS the main purpose.


They didn't have issues with Comstock, he was on their side, Anthony Comstock was the head of some "Catholic League for Decency", that was involved in book banning censorship and the like (George Bernard Shaw coined the term "Comstockery" after him, that for example, *gasp*, women showed their ankles in a movie. A magazine was literally shut down by the post office, because Comstock filed a complaint, because the magazine had an ad for a book that talked about birth control.......I think you meant they had issues with Sanger, not Comstock:).

The basic position of the church is that sex is for procreation, they call it being 'open to life', but it amounts to the same thing, because it reduces sex down to being about producing children. Leaving out unmarried couples, a married couple is basically supposed to have only vaginal sex, that manual stimulation, oral sex, anal sex and any kind of sex outside putting it in the vagina is immoral, even for a married couple, because to them it is all about babies. They can wrap it in terms like 'objectification', but the reality is exactly as I stated. Yes, sex at its root comes from the need to reproduce, it is a form of biological bribe, but the problem with their stance, as any member on this board can attest. is human beings long ago went beyond procreation, sexuality in human beings is not tied to heat cycles, not bound by pheromone responses, and has a variety of meanings to people in their relationships, that help define who they are, and leaves out that human beings are no longer the hunter/gatherers, living in a brutal world with little there but to survive and breed. BTW, they aren't fighting against objectification, as a church and political body, they are looking for the faithful to produce numbers, because numbers=power (don't believe me? When they talk about any religion, first thing they mention is numbers). Human sexuality is a major factor in who we are, yet in effect, they have reduced it to the levels of the lowest animals.

As far as people past menopause having sex, it was pretty common until the 1970's, when the vatican issued new guidelines on sexuality (that admitted the church historically had an almost psychotic reaction to sex, that it was needed for procreation, but that they also saw it as dirty, lustful, whatever, even in married couples) that finally said it was part of the basis of a firm and loving marriage, for priests to tell married couples past menopause that they should seriously think of not having sex, I have heard that from a lot of older Catholics, and from priests of the era, to make me think it was pretty widespread. One of the hypocrisies of the church is that they claim that sex has to be open to life, that artificial aids cannot be used, but they are okay with viagra, as long as the sex involved in not recreational and is 'open to life'...yet, it is more likely for a man past the age of menopause to need viagra, and what they are in effect saying is that since it is for the man, well, then it is okay, if they are hyped up to being open to life, then viagra for a man past child having age shouldn't be using it, since all sex between a married couple past menopause is recreational *shrug*.

On top of everything else, besides the fact that their teaching on sexuality and birth control has zero basis in scripture (for married couples alone, yes, but the rest of it...nope), it also leaves out the complexity of sex, what they call lust and objectification is in fact part of the reason loving couples stay together, if I lust after my spouse because I find them sexy and hot, well, I do.......I also wonder about taking advice on sexuality, morality and relationships from a bunch of men who supposedly are celibate, how the hell would they know?

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 9:09:18 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
Have you ever heard of Temple Grandin's hug machine? Bondage has a similar effect on me.

There appears to be widespread consensus on how you react to bondage so you must be wrong about yourself. You read it on the internet.


_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 9:34:10 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
I was actually announcing that my comment was completely off topic, not commenting on hers.

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: home birth in chains - 3/23/2013 11:08:48 PM   
SacredDepravity


Posts: 270
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
Let's see, it is not about chains equalling sex. It is about chains equaling a decreases mobility in a parent who is primary caretaker to small children. It is a safety thing.

It is not about how one responds to bondage. Heck, I respond similarly. It is about being able to respond in the quickest manner possible should severe complications arise. Again it is a safety thing.

I have left the subjective matters to others to hash around. We could argue that until the cows come home. I really did think there was fairly widespread agreement on the idea that obedience makes a slave, not collars, chains, or any other thingie or do-dad. If she wants the thingie, there are safer ways to keep it part of the birthing process. Why not a length of chain in her hand long enound to hold, wrap around a body part, and maybe even shake or thump on the floor? We here just want a healthy mom and baby here. Truly, that's all.

SD

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: home birth in chains - 3/24/2013 12:37:12 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The part I am waiting to hear is how, in the middle of all the pain, the pushing, the noise of chains, ect, she suddenly turns "Exorcist woman", grabs his balls and tells him "Get these fucking chains off me NOW!"



If she's anything like me, I don't think that will happen. And that's got nothing to do with being the "slaviest slave" but everything to do with the fact that bondage -any bondage- centers me, calms me down, soothes me, and makes me feel better.
The pressure, and confinement is reassuring to me. The "noise" of the chains that several people on this tread have commented about relaxes me. I've slept in chains often, as well as used them extensively during the day, and I've never even considered the idea that the rattle of a chain could register as "noise" to anybody. It registers as quite the opposite to me.

Have you ever heard of Temple Grandin's hug machine? Bondage has a similar effect on me.

Had I thought about the idea of using bondage during delivery, I would have used it myself. I'm absolutely sure that it would have made me feel tons better. And that's got nothing to do with "slaviness" or submission even, but everything with how bondage by itself affects my headspace.


And I have seen laboring women act completely out of character as the pain intensifies. I didnt say she would 100% do what I suggested, but I have seen women become violent during that process and listened as partners expressed dismay at the change.

The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that there would be some kind of documentation of other women having given birth, consensually, in shackles or some kind of restraints. I realize many here have said they never thought about it. But I find it extremely hard to believe no one has and never asked. Coupling that with the anti shackling laws that are still new in many areas and I find it hard to fathom a midwife entertaining this idea.

This is all sounding more and more like a fantasy someone dreamed up just to see how much of a rise they could get out of people here.. and it worked.. myself included.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: home birth in chains - 3/24/2013 12:56:56 AM   
FrostedFlake


Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009
From: Centralia, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

I was actually announcing that my comment was completely off topic, not commenting on hers.


Oops.

_____________________________

Frosted Flake
simul justus et peccator
Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube

"... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: home birth in chains - 3/24/2013 1:06:59 AM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

SacredDepravity post 136: Let's see, it is not about chains equalling sex. It is about chains equaling a decreases mobility in a parent who is primary caretaker to small children. It is a safety thing [sic].

No. . . At least half the negative posters are opposed to what the kids SEE. Only the other half of the negative posters, are opposed to the mobility. Some both.

But OK, LETS TALK ABOUT MOBILITY AROUND THE HOUSE. For God sake, she can do YOGA in them. There's so much slack, that she sometimes ties them up with scarves at the waist. These are SYMBOLIC. She doesn't "wear them" (OPs term) all the time. That means she can take them off !!

There's been ample time for the family to adjust, just like a handicapped family would. But she's not an immobile woman. Get it? And it comes from her. That means she wouldn't tolerate something, which is near as confining as the hysterics fear.

Plus the thing has been described. It's not confining for around the house. She's not chained TO anything. It probably doesn't even technically qualify as bondage, because it's neither immobilizing nor confining. IE not bound or caged.

BTW are we sponsoring legislation to have children removed from parents who are in wheel chairs???? The fact that there are alternatives to chains, does not, repeat not, prove her lifestyle choice wrong for her.

OP signed up for CM to ask one question only: Does anyone else here have experience with chains in child delivery. Only Inghammar Post 18 and UllrsIshtar Post 82 have come close to answering that.

_____________________________

BDSM operates on submission. Not on love, fairness, or convention.

The way to a Dom . . is to follow his karma, wallow in his grime, Swim in his heart.©

Yeah, fantasy is not reality. That's how it gives direction to the truly gifted.

(in reply to SacredDepravity)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: home birth in chains - 3/24/2013 1:34:47 AM   
Extravagasm


Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004
Status: offline
! ! ! ! * * * THIS * * * ! ! ! !
quote:

njlauren from Post124: One thing we did tell our son that might help the OP, and that is we were clear with him once he knew about me that it was something not to be talked about outside our family, not because it was shameful, but because others don't necessarily understand and such. Our S was older when the time came, 6 or 7, so it was different then little kids.....but if I was to give advice on that, assuming the OP's wife needs that, then it would be to deal with it in an age appropriate way. I wouldn't explain about how to mommy that showed her loyalty to daddy or anything complicated, simply say that mommy likes to wear those, that it makes her feel better or some such (like I said, a kink aware professional may be better at this). I wouldn't make a big deal about it, and if you tell the kids they shouldn't talk about it with outsiders, don't make it "we don't talk about that to outside people because they will do bad things" and the like, simply tell them that all families have things that are important to them and are no one else's business. If your child has something that is their secret, like a 'secret friend', tell them it is like that.......if you make it all hush hush and somber, the kid is going to pick up that and it will be the first thing they want to blab, if you make it in the realm of it is a family thing, and don't make it seem like the end of the world, they will accept it, least based on my experience.

ONCE AGAIN, njlauren, you add one of the most kind and useful additions from your obvious knowledge and experience. Way back on page 2 (when the OP was still posting) he acknowledged need for what you said:
quote:

wintermaster from Post23: As far as the appropriateness of exposing children to her bondage, she simply tells them that they are her jewelry that daddy gave her (no different than the ornate bracelets, necklaces and ankles that many women wear). She wears normal clothes and mostly long skirts which make them less obvious. Yes, we may have to sit down and talk to the children about our lifestyle someday but how is that different than a same sex couple having to discuss their lifestyle to adoptive or biological children.

Because of phrasing, or perhaps because of the ill-mood of some our respondents, it created a brief firestorm from some of our armchair authoritarians.

Your generous thoughts in particular, round out that circle, favorably. The matter of what children know of their parents lifestyle came up repeatedly at our kink munches. IMHO your approach is by far, the most safe and secure.

Cautionary fear of CPS is legitimate. But what a mistake, to assume kids will spill family knowledge mainly when parents are open with them. More likely the other way around: kids unwittingly spill secrets when they are left to DISCOVER them.

I hope those CM shushers who cringe at the thought of OP's children knowing, have a secure vault for their own apparatus, rubber suits, videos, lifestyle friends, thoughts, etc. And plausible deniability for what the vault is for.

The OP once said that he and his wife have read the site together. I'll remind everyone that they've come back to read as recently as today.

_____________________________

BDSM operates on submission. Not on love, fairness, or convention.

The way to a Dom . . is to follow his karma, wallow in his grime, Swim in his heart.©

Yeah, fantasy is not reality. That's how it gives direction to the truly gifted.

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: home birth in chains Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.508