Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Progressive Education


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Progressive Education Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:14:55 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

so if I am reading you rightly, you would have conservative posters have to do what---hunt up the newspaper source from the town the story originates from?

its far too convenient to dismiss stories as not being credible simply because someone doesn't like their sources. it (seemingly but not really) absolves people from having to deal with the actual material of the post.


Or it allows shit breathers to make extraordinary claims without foundation, and allows them, rather than deal with actual factual reality, deal with the material of the hallucinatory post, which of course is what the debate in our country should be, hallucinatory paranoia, and whether or not someone makes 'tough' speeches without the actual doing of anything.

Cuz thats what makes America great.

So, you have tried severl non-sequiturs that have no basis in reality (credible sources do not report on small matters), maybe a conspiracy (rather than slobbering idiots), and so far have been demonstrated --- no, that's not it. But the only ideas here is how to defend the hallucination, rather than find credible citations that these are indeed true facts, and argue them. We require an assumption that they are accurate and true because some absolutely laughable shiteating blogger sites repeat them without any regard to evidence.

And no, you are not reading me rightly, on two accounts. I am a conservative, you are not, and neither are those 'conservative' sites. And it has nothing to do with hometown reporting.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/25/2015 12:16:57 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:15:49 PM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
Is a fucking joke, and a plague on this country.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:17:50 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No shit. Yellow journalism and idiots always have been. Caught Germany more than once when people believed the horseshit.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:19:11 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

They are trying to make it criminal to teach, distribute, give lessons on 'harmful' books. The thing as written opens whatever anyone in their own opinion deems harmful by default criminal...

Bullshit. It applies only with regard to minors, only to material that "has a predominant tendency to appeal to prurient interest in sex to minors... is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable for minors... or lacks serious literary, scientific, educational, artistic or political value for minors," and it acknowledges parental consent as an affirmative defense.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 2/25/2015 12:39:27 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:23:08 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, sorry, been before the supreme court that one, and it is not even gonna work.

Who decides that? There is no standard, you can go look up the landmark obscenity cases, I aint gonna go over that ground again. What prevailing standards, give me the definition that we all have to live by under that law.

So, as I said, the story was more accurate than not.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:27:29 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, sorry, been before the supreme court that one, and it is not even gonna work.

Who decides that? There is no standard, you can go look up the landmark obscenity cases, I aint gonna go over that ground again. What prevailing standards, give me the definition that we all have to live by under that law.

I'm not defending the law, I'm objecting to the misrepresentation of it.

K.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 12:32:27 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You stand where you stand, and I stand here:

Absolutely no misrepresentation in that article, whatsoever.

But we are looking at the same actual text of the bill, and agree that is the fact of that.

An unusual but happy circumstance.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/25/2015 12:41:44 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 1:53:35 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
And back to progressive education:

From WFTV (an ABC affiliate...so NOT FOX)
http://m.wftv.com/news/news/local/controversial-islamic-history-lesson-hot-topic-sem/nkH3p/

Textbooks being considered for use:

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2014/09/15/proposed-texas-textbooks-are-full-of-progressive-bias-says-curriculum-accuracy-expert/

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:01:03 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

~ FR ~

Returning to the theme of progressive education...



From Feb., 25 to March 11, a giant golden clitoris sculpture will be on display in Sewanee’s library to promote feminist artist Sophia Wallace’s "CLITERACY" project... The giant golden clitoris is also a part of Wallace’s "clit rodeo," an event where participants can take turns riding a mechanical clit instead of a bull... "It's appalling and shocking to think that scientifically, the clitoris was only discovered in 1998," Wallace told The Huffington Post in 2013. ~Source

Note to Sophia Wallace: Discovery of the clitoris is credited to Matteo Realdo Columbo, professor of anatomy and surgery at the University of Padua, who documented the "seat of woman's delight" in his book De Re Anatomica, published in 1559.

Questions regarding funding went unanswered.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 2/25/2015 2:05:37 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:04:28 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Sarcasm is not only for the insightful, enlightened harangue of the political forums of collarspace.

There are some women might tell you that the clitoris has yet to be discovered by the 'anthropologists' they hang with.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:05:16 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


~ FR ~

Returning to the theme of progressive education...



From Feb., 25 to March 11, a giant golden clitoris sculpture will be on display in Sewanee’s library to promote feminist artist Sophia Wallace’s "CLITERACY" project... "Wallace’s work reveals the 'phallic as neutral' bias in science, law, philosophy, politics, mainstream and even feminist discussion, and the art world... The giant golden clitoris is also a part of Wallace’s "clit rodeo," an event where participants can take turns riding a mechanical clit instead of a bull... "It's appalling and shocking to think that scientifically, the clitoris was only discovered in 1998," Wallace told The Huffington Post in 2013. ~Source

Note to Sophia Wallace: Discovery of the clitoris is credited to Matteo Realdo Columbo, professor of anatomy and surgery at the University of Padua, who documented the "seat of woman's delight" in his book De Re Anatomica, published in 1559.

Questions regarding funding went unanswered.

K.



Maybe that is when MEN discovered it. I think that women discovered it long before then. If only I had my copy of The Trotula with me.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:12:55 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
since you are so otherwise dismissive and didn't answer my question about hometown newspapers, i wonder then if you would you do me and everyone else a favor, and define "credible" source?

I am curious too---exactly how is the independent journal review not a "credible" source?

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 2/25/2015 2:26:02 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:22:21 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Maybe that is when MEN discovered it...

Precisely. It was actually discovered long before by an ancestor of mine, who recognized the advantage this conferred upon his social life and wisely kept silent, passing the knowledge only to his sons, and they to their sons, until that big-mouth came along and ruined the gig.

K.


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 2:27:27 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

since you are so otherwise dismissive and didn't answer my question about hometown newspapers, i wonder then if you would you do me and everyone else a favor, and define "credible" source?





I answered you about hometown newspapers, learn to read, fuckstick (you want snark, you got it).

I don't know what you don't comprehend, but for the instant, let us assume you know what source means, then we will go with the credible:

Able to be believed; convincing: believable, plausible, tenable, able to hold water, conceivable, likely, probable, possible, feasible, reasonable, with a ring of truth, persuasive.

catch ahold of any of those words you understand.


ijreview with no provable facts, and their background, and their mission, and their history of spun asswipe, do not for most of us, meet any of the necessary and sufficient conditions to be defined as credible.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 2/25/2015 2:50:15 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 3:08:38 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
i do my best here to not get caught up in personal sniping...my questions to you were genuinely straight forward. calling me abusive names doesn't help.

if you answered about the newspapers, I obviously didn't see it. you could have answered again instead of being insulting.

all you did was give synonyms for "credible", that does not tell me, or anyone else what a credible source really is. by your definition then, anything you personally don't find "believable, plausible, reasonable, etc" isn't credible.

in terms of the ijreview article in particular---im not sure what "facts" they have to prove that you are talking about. they have a photo of the very homework in question. they quote the son, they quote the mother. they refer to the particular school the son went to. the eag link has the woman's name on it. the have the teacher's name on it. the woman also repeated her story to foxnews. do you think they are making it all up? it all seems very "believable" or "plausible" to me. how is it not? maybe you want a live streaming video of everything?

"its mission?" i saw a ranking that has ijr rated at the 16th most conservative website. odd then that a "conservative" would take issue with its mission. i can only surmise that its not "credible" since you are in disagreement with the political leanings of its articles.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 3:32:45 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

And back to progressive education:

From WFTV (an ABC affiliate...so NOT FOX)
http://m.wftv.com/news/news/local/controversial-islamic-history-lesson-hot-topic-sem/nkH3p/

Textbooks being considered for use:

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2014/09/15/proposed-texas-textbooks-are-full-of-progressive-bias-says-curriculum-accuracy-expert/


in reference to the breitbart link....

and those were only history texts in one state. so a couple of things come to mind. how many other states are/might be experiencing the same problem.

and it makes me wonder too---what they are reading in English classes....

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 5:25:00 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

But the overall issue is immigration. When you say that the issue is "illegal aliens," all you're really talking about is a piece of paper. The aforementioned political cartoon contained the phrase "path to citizenship," which involves changing that all important piece of paper to make "illegal" into "legal." But these are just legal technicalities, but once that's out of the way, then the underlying issue is still immigration. That's what the argument is about. That's why it's such a hot button issue. Pretending that the issue is just about not filling out their paperwork properly won't fly with me.


And the only difference between a citizen and a non-citizen is a piece of paper,


True enough.

quote:


and the difference between being acquitted and convicted is a piece of paper,


Not precisely, since being acquitted or convicted would be the result of evidence and a trial which presumably exist independent of and before the piece of paper was actually written.

quote:


the difference between a prescription and abuse of pain killers is a piece of paper,


This is false, since abuse of pain killers could happen just as easily with a prescription. Drug abuse is a psychological/physiological condition which can occur independent of any piece of paper. It's the drug itself that's relevant, not the piece of paper.

quote:


the difference between legal concealed carry and illegal concealed carry is, you got it , a piece of paper.


Yes, but who would care about the piece of paper if it wasn't referring to a gun? What would be the major issue in this example? The piece of paper or the actual gun?

quote:


So do we pretend that all those are the same because the only difference is a piece of paper? Of course the problem is ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, to pretend otherwise is to ignore reality.


The issue raised by the political cartoon in the OP had to do with the laws related to immigration and citizenship. So, it would seem that you agree with me that the hot button issue at hand is immigration, which is what the piece of paper in question relates to.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 6:15:42 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

But the overall issue is immigration. When you say that the issue is "illegal aliens," all you're really talking about is a piece of paper. The aforementioned political cartoon contained the phrase "path to citizenship," which involves changing that all important piece of paper to make "illegal" into "legal." But these are just legal technicalities, but once that's out of the way, then the underlying issue is still immigration. That's what the argument is about. That's why it's such a hot button issue. Pretending that the issue is just about not filling out their paperwork properly won't fly with me.


And the only difference between a citizen and a non-citizen is a piece of paper,


True enough.

quote:


and the difference between being acquitted and convicted is a piece of paper,


Not precisely, since being acquitted or convicted would be the result of evidence and a trial which presumably exist independent of and before the piece of paper was actually written.

quote:


the difference between a prescription and abuse of pain killers is a piece of paper,


This is false, since abuse of pain killers could happen just as easily with a prescription. Drug abuse is a psychological/physiological condition which can occur independent of any piece of paper. It's the drug itself that's relevant, not the piece of paper.

quote:


the difference between legal concealed carry and illegal concealed carry is, you got it , a piece of paper.


Yes, but who would care about the piece of paper if it wasn't referring to a gun? What would be the major issue in this example? The piece of paper or the actual gun?

quote:


So do we pretend that all those are the same because the only difference is a piece of paper? Of course the problem is ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, to pretend otherwise is to ignore reality.


The issue raised by the political cartoon in the OP had to do with the laws related to immigration and citizenship. So, it would seem that you agree with me that the hot button issue at hand is immigration, which is what the piece of paper in question relates to.


You really don't get it do you.
In each case there are legal actions preceding the mere piece of paper.
You know like going through proper channels to come into the country.
And the cartoon was, though you clearly don't get it, about Obama trying to let illegals become citizens without going through the proper channels. Don't you think this is grossly unfair to those who are trying to do it the right way?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 6:17:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Zonei

This is false, since abuse of pain killers could happen just as easily with a prescription. Drug abuse is a psychological/physiological condition which can occur independent of any piece of paper. It's the drug itself that's relevant, not the piece of paper.

Except that one way you go to jail, the other you don't.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 2/25/2015 6:20:10 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Progressive Education - 2/25/2015 6:18:48 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Yes, but who would care about the piece of paper if it wasn't referring to a gun? What would be the major issue in this example? The piece of paper or the actual gun?


Again the real difference is that with one you go to jail with the other you don't.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Progressive Education Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.117