timeoutgurlie
Posts: 588
Joined: 3/21/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: knees2you quote:
Personally, I think disgust should be reserved for those who engage in sex acts with children, animals, the dead or the disabled. Everything else is 2 or more adults agreeing to enjoy each other. I believe as my Wife LilBecque does that anytime the law comes into contact where we might have to make a change, or when it comes to the above mentioned, that people tend to get Irate because they can't have or do as they would like! You can do some of the above mentioned as long as you don't get caught, Right? Kinda like reading the Bible. We are affraid of what it might say, What we can or can not do. It's the change that we are affraid of. quote:
"Change is good! Well so is Dollars." Ant, LilBecque I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying people would be mad with laws that rule out any BDSM activity, and people would be irate? Or are you saying the laws against sex with the dead or other living people/creatures who cannot give consent is the point where people became irate for not being able to do what they 'want' in those scenarios? If someone's going to be irate over not being able to molest their child, fuck their dog, dig up a corpse or take advantage of an adult with the mental capacity of a child...hey, let them be angry, and hope they do get caught. I think I'm pretty open minded, as long as there's consent there and it's two adults, I won't judge whatever they choose to do, but there are lines you just don't cross and whether you get caught or not shouldn't be what stops you. Sex without explicit or implicit consent should blacken one's soul
|