|
Real0ne -> RE: A Moment of Silence in Memory of The Holocaust (2/7/2017 3:04:30 PM)
|
You should invest in glasses because you didnt respond to any of this:
The allies never denied what they did, hell they bragged about their crimes, and today you apologize for them!
[img]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/holycausts/dresden.gif[/img]
We have proof and plenty of it that churchill and eisenhower comitted atrocities on a scale never before see by mankind, you continue to apologize for them sell them as acceptable atrocities despite the fact they were in violation of the international law.
What do you have to gain from continuing to sweep this under the carpet?
I responded line item by line item to all your false claims and characterizations which you cant support 'any' of it and simply continue to dodge the bullet like your other felch gobblers out here.
waiting for you to support your claims? Anything at all? Little more than nothing? .
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
@whoremods,
Its a total ducking your bullshit session and not a debate at all with you because you simply move the goalposts and pretend no one will notice you neither proved nor provided evidence for a damn thing you claim, all we ever get from you is beer farts and belches and we are supposed accept it all as fact, well try giving us just one fact.
Since you have your head so far up irving ass, here is what the expert witness said regarding the irving/zundel exhibits:
quote:
I was called as an expert witness as a historian to give evidence at the Ernst Zundel case, where Zundel's researchers showed me the Leuchter Report, the laboratory tests on the crematoria and the gas chambers.
As a person who, at the University of London, studied chemistry and physics and the exact sciences, I knew that this was an exact result. There was no way around it. And suddenly all that I’d read in the archives clicked into place.
You have to accept that:
1) if there is no evidence anywhere in the archives that there were any gassings going on;
2) that if there’s not a single German document that refers to the gassings of human beings— not one wartime German document; and
3) if there is no reference anywhere in the German archives to anybody giving orders for the gassings of people, and
if, on the other hand, the forensic tests of the laboratories, of the crematoria, and
4) the gas chambers and Auschwitz and so on, show that there is no trace, no significant residue whatsoever of a cyanide compound,
5) then this can all only mean one thing.’0
and that one thing of course TO YOU and your ilk is that hitler used the labor-camps as a personal bar b q pit and served jew stew every day for lunch at the dinner table. [8|]
I numbered it so you can make your case for 'death camps' line item by line item, despite the fact the EXPERT witness that TESTIFIED actually understands the forensics and is correct in its interpretation and as usual once again you are pissing in the wind.
There a citation for you from zundle/lecter/irving crews star witness.
quote:
At the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties,
the court had to conclude that
1) it lacked ‘almost all the means or evidence
available in a normal murder trial’ including
2) ‘the bodies of the victim,
3) autopsy reports,
4) expert reports on the cause of death,
5) evidence as to the criminals,
6) murder weapons, etc
So dodge duck and dance to your heart content, and shift those goal posts!!! [8|]
and that is all we seen from you, snotty, tweak, blynmp, duckin and a dancing
[img]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stufff/zzzzzzxxxxxx.gif[/img]
Hell you dont even know how it came to war in the first place, much less defend the 'beliefs' you preach day in and day out.
|
|
|
|
