Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Do you know what five years means?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Do you know what five years means? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 1:19:46 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Sure... but it is also what reality is for me with Him. If i wasn't His hole, i wouldn't be in His life. My purpose in His life is to be His hole. That's what i am all about. We don't have any other relationship than that. I'm not his wife (He's divorced and so am i). I'm not His girlfriend (He has a girlfriend of 16 years). I am His hole. Sure we go do things sometimes, and sure i serve Him in various ways (cooking, cleaning, serving His friends if He tells me to, etc)... But i am always nothing more or less than His hole. That's my only identity with Him. And that's the way it has to be... because that is who/what i really am. It is hard to find people here that understand that. The Goreans are the closest ones that do but they aren't around much anymore. Wonder why.

You know what. You do have a relationship. Not a traditional one. But both of you are bonded together by enjoying the same dynamic. It's just not traditional. It's what works uniquely for both of you, so both of you fit each other.


Exactly. But the truth is, for me, this is the only dynamic that works for me because it is what i am. I have tried multiple other dynamics but they never work out because i ended up frustrated and depressed that i wasn't able to self-actualize to be my truest self. And that is the part that others don't seem to be able to understand... or if they do they tell you that you have a problem.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 1:28:53 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Exactly. But the truth is, for me, this is the only dynamic that works for me because it is what i am. I have tried multiple other dynamics but they never work out because i ended up frustrated and depressed that i wasn't able to self-actualize to be my truest self. And that is the part that others don't seem to be able to understand... or if they do they tell you that you have a problem.

People will always tell you that you have a problem because they aren't what you are into. What you enjoy, it might be their nightmare. So they don't get it.

Just like vanilla people might think you are mental for just being into BDSM.

Personally for me. When it comes to kink. The only question I ask is. Does it make you happy? No matter how bizarre or crazy it may sound to me, if both parties engage in it are happy doing it together with each other. That is a happy relationship.

And yea I do agree this community loves to throw stones alot about other people's kinks that differs from their own. And I don't get this part at all, because it's like they have no respect for diversity of kinks. It's so weird in a kink website.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 1:32:11 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
I don't consider myself kink. I consider myself me. I don't consider it 'something i am into'. I consider it something i am. And that's the difference between creatures like me and most (but not all) people here. I figured that out a few months ago.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 1:47:49 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
If the woman is sleeping around, it's usually the woman that's the problem.

This is double standard. So if a single man is sleeping around. There is no problem. But if a single woman is sleeping around. It is a problem?

In most western societies, yes it is.
Not just my opinion but that of many that I know.
In fact, I don't know of anyone that views loose women in any sort of high regard... not a single one.
This also includes a woman I dated for 4 years and she was just like this - and complained bitterly that it's how men treat her.
So that opinion has come from both sexes.

It's just the average opinion of people in general in the western world.
The fact that there are a few who don't think that way (yourself included) doesn't buck the trend.
I can also speak of the people I met and lived with in the US too.
Women of loose morals are not considered in high regard and even less so in areas of bible-bashers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

The conversation was about the one you have met and then opened your legs to on the first date.

What you said is that I am disrespecting my partner by having sex with him on my first date with him? WTF? Seriously? What's wrong with you?
quote:

We call that sort of woman a whore, or cheap.
As I posted, that's fine if that's all you want - a free fuck and nothing else.

You know, you are actually an extremely misogynistic male.

Nothing further from the truth Greta.
I am anything BUT a misogynist.
As has been pointed out to you, Singapore is full of desperate men.
And not just Singapore either.
Many Asian men are desperate to find a partner because the birth rate is dropping and many women don't want to get married.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
But please don't say "We" as fortunately, I have known so many British men in my life who have married women they fucked on their first date too to know that you are an abnormality. And I also know it is not uncommon for British women to fuck on their first date. And most British men do not have a problem with that. This is seriously your own personal issues and insecurity.

Ummm.... actually, no it isn't.
And I think I can safely say that I know a shit-ton more British men and women than you do to come to that opinion.
And yes, I can say "we" because I haven't met a single one that holds the opinion you assert to be true.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I mean, what is this "Free Fuck" Bullshit? You mean you NEED to pay for sex to feel the woman is worth something? Wow, okay! I assume you paid alot for your current wife then. She was not a free fuck for you? What did you pay for her?

Oh my. Now it comes down to personal insults.
My wife happen to pay for herself to relocate to me.
We lived together for almost a month before we had sex and even that was after chatting for 10 months online.

And yes, loose women are there for a free fuck.
And no, only the desperate pay for a hoe to get a fuck they can't get for free.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I prefer sex to be all about my personal pleasure and it's about me and what I enjoy and find joy in and the joy I receive in having sex is my rewards for having sex. This bullshit about me having to quantify monetary conditions that I SHOULD require in return for sex is ridiculous.

Nobody said you should pay - so that's a strawman again.
And I never said you shouldn't enjoy it either.
All I'm saying is that your attitude to sex is not appreciated by your average western man if he's looking for anything more than a fuck.
Your assertion that women with that attitude are admired is plain bullshit.
Maybe some do, but most don't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I didn't think the way you approach sex would be so transactional.

Nobody said you should.
Now who's projecting and moving the goal-posts??
Because I never said or implied that - they are your words, not mine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


I have no insecurities.
But what I do have is a sense of morality.
You seem to be devoid of that and think it's great and acceptable to open your legs and fuck on a first date.

I have sex because I enjoy sex. Not because of any other reasons other than I LOVE having sex. I don't date men I don't want to fuck. Infact, I have even refused to go out with men who told me they want to slow down and not want to fuck on first date. That's just me. Why should I stop enjoying sex for myself just because a small minority of men got "moral" issues with it?

Maybe men in Singapore are like that but most western men aren't.
What you choose to do is your choice and nobody says you shouldn't do it.
But... your assertion of what most western men is just not true.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Morals are bullshit reasons for denying a woman the right to enjoy sex for pleasure.

Nobody said anything of the sort.
Again, that's YOUR projection and your words - not mine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

You also seem to be of the opinion that men admire that sort of thing.
I'm telling you categorically that a very high proportion of men in the west DON'T unless its for a free fuck and nothing more.

I don't agree with you about that at all. Perhaps because of the way that I am, I seldom hang out with men who got issues with women enjoying sex for sex.
quote:

There's nothing wrong with enjoying sex for sex.
Where there is a problem is when one of them does that without the permission or knowledge of the other.

That is not what you said. You said that a woman cannot have sex on first date because it would be immoral. EVEN if she enjoys sex for sex. It's still immoral. That's what you said.

Care to quote where I said it was immoral??
Because I didn't.
I said that most western men do NOT consider that sort of behavour to be an admirable trait unless they were just after a free fuck.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


That's your opinion and not always the case.
But as usual, you make a sweeping statement and claim that as fact.

But going by your logic that men only marry women who don't fuck them on first date. This means, all the married women are not "Fuck on first date" types. And yet a good percentage of them cheat anyway? So how does that fit into your logic?

Again, nobody said that or implied it.
Try reading what I typed, not what you think I typed.
Don't rewrite my words to fit your mindset.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
They clearly cheat not because they were horny for sex. They cheated because emotional intimacy was disappearing in their marriage and they found it with a new man.
quote:


There is no need to cheat at all.
And it's obvious from many on these forums where this topic comes up that most also do not condone cheating.
Leave one person first before starting with another.
Cheating is frowned upon.

My point is that, your logic of the higher possibility of woman who fuck on first date to cheat is completely utterly flawed. And I explained exactly why.

And I assert that your reasoning doesn't fit most western men.
And yes, I assert that women who fuck on first date are more likely to cheat than those who don't.
No, that doesn't mean they all cheat or those that don't fuck never cheat either.
And this is also the opinion of my wife too (who is reading this).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

Just as the ONE British woman you knew that was a whore and still found men that liked her enough to marry her.
One-off's and tiny samples do not make a broad statement to be true.
Location is irrelevant if you are going to make such sweeping statements.

Just like you, using yourself, as a representative of ALL British men is completely inaccurate too.

I never claimed that.
In fact, I made a deliberate point of claiming the opposite.
Just more spin from you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
My original assertion is that, there are men who are close minded about women enjoying sex for sex.

Yes there are men like that.
Nobody has said any different.
Strawmen again.
Making claims of assertions we haven't made or implied.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Like you and awareness which is not the demographic that OP and I are going for.

Several of us read OP's post as if she were seeking something more than a fuck buddy - a replacement for her 5-year relationship.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
There are enough women who needs emotions to have sex around. I'm not even competing for men like you as men like you guys are clearly not compatible with my ideology about how women should enjoy and embrace their sexuality and not allow precisely men like you to tell her she is less because she wants to enjoy sex.

Yet again, nobody has said any such thing - you are projecting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And there are men who has the capability to appreciate women who embrace their sexuality and revel in it.

And those men are usually called gigolo's or taking advantage of women.
How many times have we both seen this sort of bad behaviour on these forums??
And now you are applauding it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I've find this even more typical in Western men than Asian men. But you are using yourself as the ball park of a Western male to say this is not typical in the West. But I think you are just living in ancient times. Everything you say about British men, is not my typical experience with British men at all!

And your experience of British (and American) men is extremely limited compared to those of us that live here.
How often have you been to the UK and for how long?
And I'm willing to bet that most men going to Singapore are businessmen looking for a free fuck or men on the hunt for a cheap bride.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And it's actually really sad when people in a kink site are still slut shaming
women. When kink involves all kinds sexual indulgence.

Nobody is slut-shaming anyone and nobody said so.
Only you are making reference to slut-shaming.

_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 1:49:15 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Why are you meeting partners online? England has munches and play parties. Go attend, and meet people.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 2:24:56 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
In most western societies, yes it is.
Not just my opinion but that of many that I know.

Yea but you come from a different generation. Back then. Yes. Today. No, it's no longer the majority men thinking.

quote:

I am anything BUT a misogynist.

It's pure misogyny to think less of a woman who enjoys sex for sex.

quote:

As has been pointed out to you, Singapore is full of desperate men.
And not just Singapore either.
Many Asian men are desperate to find a partner because the birth rate is dropping and many women don't want to get married.

Did you miss the part that the only Asian I ever been with is my x-husband? And Asian men especially Singaporean men are most sought after among Asian women of other Asian countries. So they aren't struggling.
Birth rate is not dropping because women don't want to get married. Birth rate is dropping because women are busy chasing careers and don't want babies which will interfere with their career goals. And they can't find men who are willing to be house husbands and support their career. Someone has to sacrifice. These days, women who studied so hard and got higher education are unwilling to make the sacrifice. Cost of living is also extremely high in Singapore. It's estimated require a minimum of 500k per child to raise a child in Singapore. Many people can't afford children in Singapore anymore. So why get married?
quote:


Ummm.... actually, no it isn't.
And I think I can safely say that I know a shit-ton more British men and women than you do to come to that opinion.
And yes, I can say "we" because I haven't met a single one that holds the opinion you assert to be true.

Birds of the same feathers flock together too. So the people you hang out with are probably specifically the kind that shares your mentality. Just like the people I hang out with are the type that shares my mentality.

quote:


Oh my. Now it comes down to personal insults.
My wife happen to pay for herself to relocate to me.
We lived together for almost a month before we had sex and even that was after chatting for 10 months online.

Okay, so you paid your wife with free rent before you fucked her. So you feel the need to pay the woman with something before she can have sex with you? I am not insulting your wife by the way. I am insulting your mentality of saying that if a woman fucks you on first date, she's giving you sex for free. So in another words. You are saying women should ask for payment of something in return before she gives you sex? So how is your wife not giving you free sex too? Do explain that point? What have you paid her with that her sex is not free? Please don't dodge this again. You say a woman who fucks you on first date give you free sex. So I question how is your wife's sex with you not Free of Charge for you?? How are you paying her?

quote:


Nobody said you should pay - so that's a strawman again.
And I never said you shouldn't enjoy it either.
All I'm saying is that your attitude to sex is not appreciated by your average western man if he's looking for anything more than a fuck.
Your assertion that women with that attitude are admired is plain bullshit.

My assertion is, there is enough men around who does not let whether sex happen on first date or not impact on any decision he has on whether a relationship is possible between both. This has more to do about matching values.

If it is a man who feels sexual compatibility is important. He would want to get sex out of the way ASAP, like me, so that we know if we want more. And couldn't hung up on silly things like whether the lady fucks on first date or not.

If it is a man who feels sexual compatibility is the lowest importance on his list, like yourself and maybe Awareness. Then yes, when you are looking for a life mate, you want to see whether other part fits or not first before you go to sex. And you will be finding women who doesn't have sexual preferences, but just likes sex with emotional intimacy.

But I am a woman with very specific and precise sexual preference. So any man who doesn't fit me sexually will be friendzoned. It's as simple as that. So sex on first date is more for me to gauge if I want to see this man again on a second date or not. End of the day, I wouldn't want to waste a whole month dating a man and then later hating him in bed. Which happens alot. There are plenty of men I like outside the bedroom but hate inside the bedroom. And there are also plenty of men I don't feel any mental connection outside the bedroom, and love inside the bedroom with him as he sexually suits me. They become FwBs. The ones who I like outside the bedroom, become my platonic friends especially after i found out sex was incompatible.
Haven't met one who fit both sides yet.
quote:

Care to quote where I said it was immoral??
Because I didn't.

What's the difference between saying "No Morals" and "Immoral"? Same shit!
quote:

I said that most western men do NOT consider that sort of behavour to be an admirable trait unless they were just after a free fuck.

There goes your "free fuck" statement again.
quote:

Several of us read OP's post as if she were seeking something more than a fuck buddy - a replacement for her 5-year relationship.

One of my longest running fuck buddy has been with me for 5 years and we talk everyday. Fuck buddies can last 5 years too. My average fuck buddies stick around for 2 years averagely. Usually it ends because of relocation due to change of job.
quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And there are men who has the capability to appreciate women who embrace their sexuality and revel in it.

And those men are usually called gigolo's or taking advantage of women.
How many times have we both seen this sort of bad behaviour on these forums??
And now you are applauding it.

I have nothing against about gigolos or prostitutes ever. I see no problem with them earning a living with sex.
But if a man is working hard and giving his all to give a woman nirvana sex and unlimited orgasms. I don't see how he is taking advantage of her as long as she had a great time.
quote:


And I'm willing to bet that most men going to Singapore are businessmen looking for a free fuck or men on the hunt for a cheap bride.

Dowry of Chinese women starts from 40k that the man gotta pay their parents too. So definitely not cheap. If they think they are getting it cheap, good luck to them.
quote:


Nobody is slut-shaming anyone and nobody said so.
Only you are making reference to slut-shaming.

You have been slut shaming all the way about women who have sex on first date. By calling them "loose", "no morals".

That's slut shaming. You wouldn't say the same things about a male. Thus it's slut shaming when you are applying double standards of the same thing towards a woman.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 2/26/2017 2:27:48 PM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 2:37:00 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I don't consider myself kink. I consider myself me. I don't consider it 'something i am into'. I consider it something i am. And that's the difference between creatures like me and most (but not all) people here. I figured that out a few months ago.

I wouldn't try to tell you how you identify with yourself.

To me a kink is like being gay. You are born with it. It's a part of you. It's naturally occuring there. That's what a kink is.

It's like breathing air.

That's how I see kinks.

It's not a kink if it can go away. And if it's just phase.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/26/2017 3:25:09 PM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
In most western societies, yes it is.
Not just my opinion but that of many that I know.

Yea but you come from a different generation. Back then. Yes. Today. No, it's no longer the majority men thinking.

This opinion also comes from my daughter (23), her fiance (21), my son (21) and most of their friends of that age group.
It also comes from my friends who are half my age.
So no, it's not an age or generational thing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I am anything BUT a misogynist.

It's pure misogyny to think less of a woman who enjoys sex for sex.

I never claimed they were "less" - that's YOUR expression, not mine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

As has been pointed out to you, Singapore is full of desperate men.
And not just Singapore either.
Many Asian men are desperate to find a partner because the birth rate is dropping and many women don't want to get married.

Did you miss the part that the only Asian I ever been with is my x-husband? And Asian men especially Singaporean men are most sought after among Asian women of other Asian countries. So they aren't struggling.
Birth rate is not dropping because women don't want to get married. Birth rate is dropping because women are busy chasing careers and don't want babies which will interfere with their career goals. And they can't find men who are willing to be house husbands and support their career. Someone has to sacrifice. These days, women who studied so hard and got higher education are unwilling to make the sacrifice. Cost of living is also extremely high in Singapore. It's estimated require a minimum of 500k per child to raise a child in Singapore. Many people can't afford children in Singapore anymore. So why get married?

That goes against the BBC Asian report (presented by Rico Hizon who lives in Singapore) that Asian women are outnumbered by Asian men by a whole magnitude of ten.
The "Click" program even reported a new App for dating couples in Japan too!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


Ummm.... actually, no it isn't.
And I think I can safely say that I know a shit-ton more British men and women than you do to come to that opinion.
And yes, I can say "we" because I haven't met a single one that holds the opinion you assert to be true.

Birds of the same feathers flock together too. So the people you hang out with are probably specifically the kind that shares your mentality. Just like the people I hang out with are the type that shares my mentality.

My friends are not of my mentality and neither are my associates from work.
My wife's friends are those she grew up with at school and their families that she hasn't lived near for decades and don't share her views either.

It seems you are making excuses in an attempt to backup your claims.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


Oh my. Now it comes down to personal insults.
My wife happen to pay for herself to relocate to me.
We lived together for almost a month before we had sex and even that was after chatting for 10 months online.

Okay, so you paid your wife with free rent before you fucked her. So you feel the need to pay the woman with something before she can have sex with you?

Actually, no. She paid the rent.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I am not insulting your wife by the way.

You hurled the biggest insult possible against my wife!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I am insulting your mentality of saying that if a woman fucks you on first date, she's giving you sex for free.

Well... unless you paid for it, it was for free, was it not??
Simple logic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
So in another words. You are saying women should ask for payment of something in return before she gives you sex?

I never said any such thing.
Again, your words, not mine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
So how is your wife not giving you free sex too? Do explain that point?

She does - and I'm not complaining.
But you are twisting my words and missing the label.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
What have you paid her with that her sex is not free? Please don't dodge this again.

I haven't paid her for anything.
She proposed to me and she paid for the wedding.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
You say a woman who fucks you on first date give you free sex.

That's NOT what I said.
Please try to read what I typed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
So I question how is your wife's sex with you not Free of Charge for you?? How are you paying her?

I'm not. Next question??

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


Nobody said you should pay - so that's a strawman again.
And I never said you shouldn't enjoy it either.
All I'm saying is that your attitude to sex is not appreciated by your average western man if he's looking for anything more than a fuck.
Your assertion that women with that attitude are admired is plain bullshit.

My assertion is, there is enough men around who does not let whether sex happen on first date or not impact on any decision he has on whether a relationship is possible between both. This has more to do about matching values.

I don't disagree with this.
But... you don't seem to understand that your assertion is just not true for most western men.
It is true for some; but not most.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
If it is a man who feels sexual compatibility is important. He would want to get sex out of the way ASAP, like me, so that we know if we want more. And couldn't hung up on silly things like whether the lady fucks on first date or not.

I'm speaking from a male mindset. You are not.
It is obvious, and documented, that the sexes think about most things in a very different way.
Yes, there are men that want to test sexual compatibility - nobody is denying that.
There are also men that actually don't want sex at all.
But most red-blooded sexual men just want a fuck.
That's the truth of it if they were honest.
Some like to play around and western society doesn't see the harm in that (that's not my personal PoV).
Some prefer to be in a relationship that involves intimacy and some sort of a legal partnership.
However, for some reason, western society still hasn't grown out of the simple fact that men see loose women behaving badly like a lot of men do as something not to be admired because those sort of loose women are historically seen as hoes/prostitutes.
It's simple old pre-modern values that still hasn't really been fixed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
If it is a man who feels sexual compatibility is the lowest importance on his list, like yourself and maybe Awareness. Then yes, when you are looking for a life mate, you want to see whether other part fits or not first before you go to sex.

Not true for myself nor people that I know.
I can't speak for awareness.

Perhaps you cannot comprehend that many people evaluate a lot of compatibility issues on an equal level rather than having things strictly prioritised like you do.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And you will be finding women who doesn't have sexual preferences, but just likes sex with emotional intimacy.

Everyone is an individual.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
But I am a woman with very specific and precise sexual preference. So any man who doesn't fit me sexually will be friendzoned. It's as simple as that.

That would be your preference that not everyone shares.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
So sex on first date is more for me to gauge if I want to see this man again on a second date or not. End of the day, I wouldn't want to waste a whole month dating a man and then later hating him in bed. Which happens alot.

Again, not so much in the west.
Yes there are incompatibilities in various aspects of a relationship.
But most will work on them and make compromises to get the advantages in other areas.
There are not many like you who reject someone based purely on sexual compatibility.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
There are plenty of men I like outside the bedroom but hate inside the bedroom. And there are also plenty of men I don't feel any mental connection outside the bedroom, and love inside the bedroom with him as he sexually suits me. They become FwBs. The ones who I like outside the bedroom, become my platonic friends especially after i found out sex was incompatible.
Haven't met one who fit both sides yet.

The fact that you haven't found your match after such a long time would benefit from the advice that many of us give when we see others on here with such an issue: the common denominator in all these encounters is you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

Care to quote where I said it was immoral??
Because I didn't.

What's the difference between saying "No Morals" and "Immoral"? Same shit!

Actually, no it's not the same shit.
This is where your understanding of the nuances of English escape you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I said that most western men do NOT consider that sort of behavour to be an admirable trait unless they were just after a free fuck.

There goes your "free fuck" statement again.

Because it's quite relevant.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

Several of us read OP's post as if she were seeking something more than a fuck buddy - a replacement for her 5-year relationship.

One of my longest running fuck buddy has been with me for 5 years and we talk everyday. Fuck buddies can last 5 years too. My average fuck buddies stick around for 2 years averagely. Usually it ends because of relocation due to change of job.

I don't see the relevance of this here.

quote:

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
And there are men who has the capability to appreciate women who embrace their sexuality and revel in it.

And those men are usually called gigolo's or taking advantage of women.
How many times have we both seen this sort of bad behaviour on these forums??
And now you are applauding it.

I have nothing against about gigolos or prostitutes ever. I see no problem with them earning a living with sex.

I don't either.
You are missing the label again.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
But if a man is working hard and giving his all to give a woman nirvana sex and unlimited orgasms. I don't see how he is taking advantage of her as long as she had a great time.

Nobody is saying anything to the contrary.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


And I'm willing to bet that most men going to Singapore are businessmen looking for a free fuck or men on the hunt for a cheap bride.

Dowry of Chinese women starts from 40k that the man gotta pay their parents too. So definitely not cheap. If they think they are getting it cheap, good luck to them.

Who said anything about Chinese women??

ETA: not every woman demands a dowry even if they are Chinese.
My work colleague (Patrick Leung) didn't pay any dowry for his wife.
He comes (originally) from Hong Kong and his wife (with her sister) lived in the mountains to the west of Beijing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:


Nobody is slut-shaming anyone and nobody said so.
Only you are making reference to slut-shaming.

You have been slut shaming all the way about women who have sex on first date. By calling them "loose", "no morals".

Because that's the perception of the average western male.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
That's slut shaming.

Not in my book it isn't.
It is an accurate way to describe them using dictionary definitions.
If you don't like those definitions, take it up with them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
You wouldn't say the same things about a male. Thus it's slut shaming when you are applying double standards of the same thing towards a woman.

Actually, I did exactly that by calling men who behave that way as gigolo's.
Perhaps you should look it up.

It seems that you are applying your mindset and experiences in your tiny little insular world and think it fits everywhere else.
I can tell you, as have others, that a lot of what you perceive (and post as facts) doesn't fit in most other places worldwide.



Anyway, this has become a personal war that shouldn't dominate the thread.
So this is where I bow out.


< Message edited by freedomdwarf1 -- 2/26/2017 3:34:59 PM >


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/27/2017 4:10:25 AM   
doraSalonica


Posts: 22
Joined: 4/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


Don't worry about Awareness. He is actually rather conservative towards sexuality in many ways.


I do not worry at all. I tend to be understanding and forgiving. I hardly ever lose my temper, especially when confronted with aggressive behavior. I do not respond to aggression with aggression. And I certainly do not lose any sleep over it.:)

I sincerely appreciate your commentary. Thank you.

To explain the thrust of the argument a bit, and the title, which seemed to confuse some, I simply made a comparison between two dominant men: one who invests time and energy, for a very long time, and therefore enjoys a long lasting relationship, and has the right to expect a lot in return, and another who cannot invest a few minutes per day but still has the audacity to expect a lot in return. Well, what the second one got, was three mediocre sessions and a crumby thread on CS.

I am certainly not willing to surrender control to someone who does not know what to do with me and how to handle me and guide me in the best way possible - better than I could do it myself. So, in order to select the right person to whom I will surrender control, I must have certain criteria. It is these criteria that make some "dominant" people froth at the mouth. They do not like to be deemed inadequate, of course. Their argument usually has to do with "oh, these are romantic notions", blah-blah, blah-blah.

Unfortunately, for them, there are subs who will not surrender control to crappy men.

That is what five years means. It means that there IS such a thing as excellence, and if one can recognize it and strive for it, one will recognize crappiness too and avoid it. I do make mistakes, just like everyone, but I know a mistake when I see one.

That was the purpose of this thread. A reminder that there is crap, but also that there is excellence. And that is the best type of awareness.




< Message edited by doraSalonica -- 2/27/2017 4:17:51 AM >


_____________________________

Re-invent yourself

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Do you know what five years means? - 2/27/2017 9:02:01 AM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: doraSalonica


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

Well dora, you left out some vital information in that initial post didn't you?

You:

"I have enjoyed a loving D/s relationship with a Master for five years and I felt safe and secure and content. This means everyday communication for five years.

I joined the community here and advertised that I am looking for a Dom. I got many replies, and was at a loss trying to reply to all of them or prioritize.'


That indicates YOU are looking for a partner, not a playmate. There are still men in the world that will try to cloak their doggedness in something more chivalrous.

So you wanted a playmate and got one, albeit short term. You write as though he screwed you over, which he didn't. He simply played and moved on. Sorry, but what you did here was dishonest. You didn't want a relationship, yet went along with his talk about what will happen if you are his without the lies and the game you are playing being brought up.

Trust is of vital importance in every relationship, and many say in a lifestyle relationship it is THE most important. You held back, you were dishonest from the start. The advice originally gave you is still valid to the question you presented, however the addition information you provided later just shows that honesty is always the best policy and you got want you wanted



The way I see it, if he wanted to just play, he would have done just that. I was perfectly happy with it, as I told him from the beginning.

There was no need for him to demand exclusivity, to ask me not to play with others, to be the only one who ever fucks my pussy, to call me every day for one month and then suddenly stop, to say he will think about whether he wants to invest in a relationship. He asked me to invest, and then said he would think about investing himself.

I am not monogamous and I made that clear from the beginning. I was honest, as I always am. But the difference is, I know what I want... Some people are a bit muddled in their thinking. And quite stingy, I might add. I do not see how 5 minutes per day for a quick sms or a phone call is a serious investment. But it is a nice touch, and it does show respect, that you care about the person you play with, just a little bit...

Oh well, it does not matter anymore. After all, W/we all get what we deserve in life.
:)



My but you do twist things to what you want. You don't want monogamy, but you expect a phone call or text every day to show he respects you. You feel you are in a position to judge what he did as wrong, yet feel you were totally honest with him, while your OP here left out pertinent details.

You are not a child and not new to this lifestyle (if we take your profile at face value), but you seem to be clueless as to how men operate or at least feel you have a right to gripe. So he called you every day for a month and then dumped you. He demanded exclusivity and didn't want to return it. YOU made the choice to agree even though you "aren't monogamous." This sounds nothing like someone who knows what they want, and everything like someone getting exactly what they deserve in life.

(in reply to doraSalonica)
Profile   Post #: 50
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Do you know what five years means? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.352