RE: Dommes

RE: Dommes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

LadyPact -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 9:12:02 PM)
Some people would debate that. [;)]

tamaka -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 9:15:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Some people would debate that. [;)] Don't wink at me you pos.

LadyPact -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 9:36:58 PM)
When your so - called master wipes his ass with you, don't blame me.

tamaka -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 9:47:37 PM)
Maybe you should try being with a real man someday and then you wouldn't have such a low opinion of men. But being the pos that you are, no real man would want you.

LadyPact -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 9:59:46 PM)
i don't have a low opinion of men. Not real men. How come you have time to post every day? Why are you not busy being happy? Everybody should have their happy. Why aren't you in bed serving your master???

tamaka -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 10:01:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact i don't have a low opinion of men. Not real men. How come you have time to post every day? Why are you not busy being happy? Everybody should have their happy. Why aren't you in bed serving your master??? You are not a person who i would share any personal details of my life with.

LadyPact -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 10:08:53 PM)
Neither are you, honey. Neither are you.

tamaka -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 10:14:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Neither are you, honey. Neither are you. Don't call me honey, you pos.

LadyPact -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 10:28:49 PM)
Did it hurt?

tamaka -> RE: Dommes (3/19/2017 10:36:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Did it hurt? Yes actually, it did.

stef -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 12:22:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I'd stand MP up against your so-called 'master' any day. Tasocka's "master" would have to exist in the real world for you to make such a comparison. I fear said "master" is as genuine as tasocka.

respectmen -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 1:04:12 AM)
Lisa quote: But more often it's men being aggressive toward women online, and we have every right to whine about it because it's fucking rude. More often it's women making sweeping generalisations against the opposite gender and have more prejudice against the opposite gender. Men have every right to whine about it because it's fucking rude. quote: If someone is a stranger to you, then you should speak to them like a normal person speaking to a normal person. It really is just that simple. Take your hand off your wang or pull the dildo out of your woo before you send a message. Is this a normal website? Is everyone who is seeking here is seeking something normal? I thought people come here to seek someone who is abnormal. LP quote: If, in this next month, every a hundred gay guys started asking you about your sex life, gave you detailed descriptions of what they were "curious" about or what they wanted to do to you, how would you respond? As I'm not bisexual nor gay, I would probably respond and say thanks but no thanks or not respond at all. quote: You used to have a backside pic of your ass on this site? Why did you take it down? Because I'm not interested in picking up here anymore, therefore, why show any pics? quote: Every person, regardless of age, gender, or orientation, should have the right to the theory of consent and that includes who they will engage with and who they won't. You have that right. Why don't you think women have that right, too. For starters, feel free to quote anything from me that indicates I think women are obligated to reply or engage real time play with just any Tom, Dick, or Harry. You seem to do this often, you totally misrepresent my points. Besides your replies usually being very long winded, this is also another reason why I decide to quit replying during discussion as I'm not up to all the work in having to explain myself in things you misinterpret. As much as anyone has a right to discuss BDSM anytime they want on a BDSM website and do so to find out deal breakers before going further with the person, anyone also has the right to ignore the message or say thanks but no thanks. No one has the right to set rules upon others.

respectmen -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 1:06:17 AM)
Poor Lisa's problem and for many women in these sites, they expect a special man to want them for a relationship when they show absolutely nothing that makes them worthy of a relationship. Gotta larf

thishereboi -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 2:58:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: MsLadySue quote: It is unnatural for a woman to be dominant over a man. So of course 'dommes' are just bitchy women who want to take advantage of someone more fucked up than themselves. Excuse me? What a crock of crap. Where did you come up with that gem of 'wisdom'? Just look at your face in your profile as an example. You look like an angry bitch. And i don't say that to be mean. I am just pointing out what's obvious. What fucking bullshit, of course you said it to be mean. That said I honestly doubt anyone cares enough about you to be hurt by it but that doesn't really change your intent.

MsLadySue -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 3:21:57 AM)
Trouble with tamaka is he/she can't decide if they're male or female when responding. 'She's' usually quite polite and 'he's' just mean. Whichever the profile belongs to, I take their bullshit with a grain of salt.

respectmen -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 3:53:27 AM)
quote: i don't have a low opinion of men. Not real men. LP may not exactly have a low opinion on men but plenty do on here and get off scot free. Women define a "real man" on what they can do for them and for their own self serving benefits. It's no better than me saying you're only a real woman if you will easily give me sex.

Lucylastic -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 5:38:09 AM)
quote: Women define a "real man" on what they can do for them and for their own self serving benefits. Thats exactly what tamaka just did, in a spectacularly ignorant dumb fashion. and thats all you want, is a "real woman" to give you sex easily? so sad

respectmen -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 6:05:07 AM)
quote: Women define a "real man" on what they can do for them and for their own self serving benefits. Thats exactly what tamaka just did, in a spectacularly ignorant dumb fashion. and thats all you want, is a "real woman" to give you sex easily? so sad 1. Where did I imply that? ...Besides sarcastically saying it in the above post. 2. If me and a woman had sex, how would that be self serving on my end? Unless you are claiming the woman holds some superiority on her end. laughs The age old dumb double standard. A woman offering sex to a man = submissive A man offering sex to a woman = domineering

Lucylastic -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 6:10:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: respectmen Women define a "real man" on what they can do for them and for their own self serving benefits. It's no better than me saying you're only a real woman if you will easily give me sex. oooooh so its sarcasm now is it? what utter bollocks. You treat women as if they should serve your self serving interests. your posts scream it every time. you missed it, completely

NoirMetal -> RE: Dommes (3/20/2017 6:12:28 AM)
But it's always just dandy for sub men to objectify Fem Doms and hold them to fantasy standards. Yes,there are a lot of pros in the scene-people like you enable the behavior you despise. Blame the supply side.

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.4882813