heavyblinker
Posts: 3623
Status: offline
|
Also, you know for sure that Crowdstrike doctored the data it sent to the FBI, because they aren't just being paid to investigate the hack, they're being paid to put their reputation on the line and risk being prosecuted for nearly starting a war with Russia. How much did they get for that? It must have been a lot, considering the risks involved. I'm guessing you know how much they received since you are sure it happened and everything. EXCEPT: http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/5/14178806/fbi-dnc-hack-server-examined-forensics-russia quote:
It’s common for the initial forensic analysis to be conducted by outside firms like CrowdStrike, and once that data has been copied, there’s often little need to copy it again. BuzzFeed described the FBI’s lack of interest in the DNC’s server as unusual, citing a number of response firms that preferred not to be named. But that’s not a unanimous opinion, and two experts contacted by The Verge disagreed that it was unusual. “This is normal practice,” says Matt Tait, founder and CEO of Capital Alpha Security. “In cases like this, the onus for digital forensics is on the third-party contracted by the company that's calling in the incident response team, in this case CrowdStrike.” Why are you such a pathological liar, Kirata? It could be that the DNC didn't want to share their server access with the bureau led by the guy who practically singlehandedly destroyed Hillary's chances of becoming president. Regardless, I'm pretty confident that the FBI agents know how to do their jobs better than you do, Kirata... your delusions of grandeur are just that-- delusions. Get help.
|