RE: Science anarchists

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Science anarchists

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science anarchists

Page: << < prev 19 20 21 [22] 23 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Science anarchists - 5/14/2017 7:03:55 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

Stop dodging the point.
what is the diameter of the point 4 and the point 5 on the cartesian coordinate graph, must be pretty small since you cant seem to find it, or more likely you are just an imbecile.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/14/2017 3:04:58 PM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

stop dodging your retardation, time is never zero and instantaneous has the original meaning in physics that I said it did, you flip on a lightswitch and light comes on instantaneously.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/14/2017 10:42:55 PM

Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

but according to you every numner must have interval and slope and found by ratio, that does not allow for an integer in the manner in which you are splaining it.

no dumbass. no single number need have an interval. here is one: 17. many numbers in several combinations need not have an interval. Do not say that I am saying that retarded shit, you are the only retarded shitbreather saying stupid shit. I have made exactly two points and two points only on this thread (aside from your being a profound fucking retard) Time can never be 0 it is not in the set of its numbers, as it is impossible, and it is a necessary and sufficient condition of the defintion of time that it cannot be zero. and no denominator can be 0.

And for both, not fucking ever.

Anyone who says to the contrary is a fucking retard, and that fits you.

Time can be zero since time does not exist.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/time-does-not-exist-math-proof.65439/

< Message edited by tamaka -- 5/14/2017 10:48:39 PM >

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 5:09:06 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yeah, no. give me the chain of events that explains a 2p orbitals.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 6:11:52 AM

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

I’ve never once in my life argued absolutes – over the epochs I sporadically add in I mean probably, more than likely, about as certain as you can be, 95% confidence on the bell end curve (guffaws)is usually enough for me. It is 5 sigma they use now?

In an ideal world I know what is meant by: 1, 1 apple, 1 metre, 1 electron volt, etc.

The harder you try to measure, or define, something absolutely, the harder it becomes to do so.

Not quite sure how to best explain this:
1. How do you define 1 metre and then measure that 1 metre accurately, absolutely, etc to the nearest atom, elementary particle (not that I think we know what those are) and that’s before you factor in the quantum malarkey which in essence is a bit like magic

2. …hmm take 1 apple you will have bits and bobs of that one apple vanishing into the ether, teleported around the universe(s), bits of cosmic malarkey blootering its way through it

3. Take something like absolute zero – we can never truly get there and most people say that now. We can get dammed close, just never all the way there.

4. Gravity and time no-one knows what they are.

5. Infinity – if I got a bit of paper and pencil and stared to write down 1, 2, 3, etc I would eventually run out of atoms. I am not sure if this is true but I think Carl Sagan if you tried to write out a googolplex, or googolplex to the power of googleplex you would run out of atoms too – he probably said it a lot more eloquently

Yet I will still argue against things like the speed of light being constant, and argue that global warming is real.

why are talking orbitals now?
Atomic orbital

Well at least no-one started the double slit experiment thread.

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/15/2017 6:12:17 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 7:10:41 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

you can improve upon the accuracy of measurements infinitely, but you are still wrong. Heisenberg uncertainty principle and all that physics shit, something we wouldnt acknowledge in a science thread. Too much science and not enough false and inaccurate principles and magical ideas.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to WickedsDesire)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 7:33:58 AM

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

Was really for real0ne that - you know me I hate to use the reply button properly, and those quotes of quotes of quotes do my tits in.

never understood the wave function myself and i still dont

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/15/2017 7:38:00 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 7:56:42 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

none of which has anything to do with the accuracy of a point given.

still waiting for you to tell us the diameter of the points felchenbergerung

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:02:22 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

but according to you every numner must have interval and slope and found by ratio, that does not allow for an integer in the manner in which you are splaining it.

no dumbass. no single number need have an interval. here is one: 17. many numbers in several combinations need not have an interval. Do not say that I am saying that retarded shit, you are the only retarded shitbreather saying stupid shit. I have made exactly two points and two points only on this thread (aside from your being a profound fucking retard) Time can never be 0 it is not in the set of its numbers, as it is impossible, and it is a necessary and sufficient condition of the defintion of time that it cannot be zero. and no denominator can be 0.

And for both, not fucking ever.

Anyone who says to the contrary is a fucking retard, and that fits you.

Time can be zero since time does not exist.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/time-does-not-exist-math-proof.65439/

good one!
neither does an inch or foot, these are nothing more than abstract measurement systems that we arbituarily created to measure distance or duration between events.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tamaka)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:20:34 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

they are not arbitrary, in no way are they random or whim, they are based on reason and system.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:23:35 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

oh? I never found time or a ruler in nature, is that something we have to mine or maybe its laying around on the moonenfelchingarglerung

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:31:58 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

of course you haven't, but I have explained repeatedly, you are a fucking retard, and what you have or havent done is of no concern to the world at large, you are meaningless.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:37:01 AM

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

You can never measure something accurately. The more you try the more immense machinery (and knowledge) is required (and this excludes quantum malarkey)
Where do they keep that metre anyway – the kilogram is in Paris – but that is losing weight - or possibly gaining apparently

The problem is that after 126 years the seven kilogram masses no longer weigh the same: they are out by about 60 micrograms (thats actually quite a lot). And because the International Prototype is deemed the standard, it is unclear whether it has become lighter or the others heavier. Most likely it is Le Grand K losing mass through minute amounts of gas diffusing from the artefact or atoms leaving the artefact from handling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram

anyhows why are we talking about all this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre oh ffs that is nonsense too

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 5/15/2017 9:05:56 AM >

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 8:46:20 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

here is the 2p orbitals, note that they are elongated (and the higher the orbital the more and complex shape it takes (their orbit must be *gasp* an integer)

http://winter.group.shef.ac.uk/orbitron/AOs/2p/index.html

where are you measuring at? it actually changes size, are you getting both ends (assuming you are measuring linear something) when both orbitals are at their farthest point?

So, there are issues aplenty if you are going to be perfect. And we cannot achieve it. Not ever.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to WickedsDesire)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:02:30 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

You can never measure something accurately. The more you try the more immense machinery is required (and this excludes quantum malarkey)
Where do they keep that metre anyway – the kilogram is in Paris – but that is losing weight - or possibly gaining apparently

The problem is that after 126 years the seven kilogram masses no longer weigh the same: they are out by about 60 micrograms (thats actually quite a lot). And because the International Prototype is deemed the standard, it is unclear whether it has become lighter or the others heavier. Most likely it is Le Grand K losing mass through minute amounts of gas diffusing from the artefact or atoms leaving the artefact from handling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram

anyhows why are we talking about all this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre oh ffs that is nonsense too

ah huh, but what is physically possible and what is mathematically possible are completely 2 different ball games.

I posted given data, which is not something snottycockgarlerung can obscure with square pegs in round holes without destroying integers in the process.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to WickedsDesire)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:05:21 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

nothing to do with waves or particles, as the snotty turns, damn the torpedoes full speed off the deep end!

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:22:19 AM

Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer this means "whole" numbers dear readers

Christ I just explained why they don't truly exist. Whom off you two first tried to be smart and used the term instantaneous - is to blame. You can argue that that word should not really exist.

Anyhoos we need a good global warming thread, or wicked is a bit daft thread. Ah that’s why I started this thread that orange nutjob in the white house and the fact that scientists need to be perceived as more than fake news, witches etc and felt the need to demonstrate against a lying clueless fuk of a president who declares them so

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:30:11 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

nothing to do with waves or particles, as the snotty turns, damn the torpedoes full speed off the deep end!

I am not discussing waves or particles crap. So, not only are you absolutely retarded, and wrong, you are also retarded and wrong.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Real0ne)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:34:17 AM

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

2p orbitals has nothing to do with nothing but your cockgarglebergerung

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)

RE: Science anarchists - 5/15/2017 9:43:01 AM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

pick any orbital like I said, I picked a simple one for you and you still didnt get it you fucking retard.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Real0ne)

Page: << < prev 19 20 21 [22] 23 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Science anarchists

Page: << < prev 19 20 21 [22] 23 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.113