|
Real0ne -> RE: Modern Contemporary Atheist Mythology (8/10/2017 9:27:55 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:
quote:
If you lack belief you have no legitimately expressable opinion yet at the very same time you express an opinion that in fact is a belief, a belief there is no God.
So that would also apply if I were to alter that to
"If you lack belief you have no legitimately expressable opinion yet at the very same time you express an opinion that in fact is a belief, a belief there are no pogo-sticking elves in my street" ...?
I'm taking it, then, that you don't agree with the alteration? I can't replace 'belief in God' with 'belief in pogo-sticking elves'? Why not?
sure I dont have a problem with that said the way using my statement, my point still stands, its as senseless with elves as it is with God, its not what objet you insert its purely the contradiction of your statement so you should avoid changing the argument to a strawman as it appears you are attempting to do.
to be perfectly clear
If you lack belief you have no legitimately expressable opinion yet at the very same time you express an opinion that in fact is a belief, a belief there is no elf.
You have nowhere else to go RO. You see, G o d...IS the ultimate strawman. He was invented whole cloth, out of thin air to justify power, human violence, murder, subjugation and prejudice. The religious affairs built around [god] has also proven to be quite profitable. I mean come on man...I could buy ($$) absolution ?
You see RO, in Islam for sure and even to more 'religions' you are going straight to hell and simply for being a non-believer...in their god.
For 1/3 of the religious world, 2 out of every other Muslim, Christian and Jew...is going to hell. You can't all be right but you can all...be wrong.
Anybody out there doesn't have a god ? Invent one...he'll (she'll)...do just fine.
Thats not even acceptable rhetoric much less good rhetoric. What you fail to comprehend is that you merely have chosen a different god. This thread is about atheist mythology that as far as I am concerned proves to any reasonable person that the atheists dogma is no more 'fact' than the believers dogma.
I already pointed out proved in another thread that atheists hijacked believer dogma and simply relabelled it, its what every gubmint does and they enforce it as law while at the same time advertising themselves as purely secular while establishing their own flavor of 'religion'.
The 'lack belief' argument is so easy to prove as bullshit I did it with both brains tied behind my head.
No one on the planet nets more profit than the ZioJiz orwellian atheist state.
Look at peons posts, that 100% state indoctrination.
Well there is no atheist dogma and the only fact required for atheists, is their disbelief.
You have shown no proof at all of anything really and the govt. has nothing to do with it.
I fully recognise your problem. [sm=lalala.gif]
Dr. Haidt compared the writings of the new atheists to people like Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck who are known for their dogmatic positions. The study analyzed the entire text of each of their newest books for words and phrases that denote dogmatic opinions. Phrases like: “always” “never,” “certainly,” “every,” and “undeniable.” and in atheist Sam Harris’s book these dogmatic phrases represented over 2.5% of every word in the book. That’s five dogmatic words for every 200 words in the book!
http://creationtoday.org/new-study-exposes-atheist-dogma/
oops I guess you are wrong.
No religion condemns polyamory as a sin except the gubmint, looks like you are wrong again.
|
|
|
|
