Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting racism...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting racism... Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 5:24:56 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: oldncreepy

Go ahead and sanitize history. Take your time, make sure you don't miss anything. When you're finished, take a look at what you have left.

If you find yourself with a little spare time on your hands, sit down and read a little George Orwell.


No one is 'sanitizing history. Quite the opposite they are pointing out that thes men were traitors to their country.


They were no more traitors than Tina Turner renouncing US citizenship, a Canadian becoming American or a Mexican illegal gaining American citizenship. They renounced American citizenship and went to another country. If they had done that in the middle of a war or a battle they may have been traitors.

Renouncing your citizenship is not treason...taking up arms against your country is.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 5:28:17 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


Go ahead, erase these men from history, but remember some of the statues are not for their service to the south, but their contributions either before or after the war.


Cite please.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 5:31:24 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


Obviously, in the same vein that Washington and Jefferson etal were slave owners we have to burn the constitution and the Declaration of Independence because those documents were tainted by the slavery.


It is not about slave owners asshoie it is about traitors who took up arms against their country in contravention of their sacred oath.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 5:38:21 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


Liberty is offensive. Freedom of speech is a thought crime, the freedom to assemble an affront to the peoples' democratic morality
police

That pretty much sums up sanity's kkk/nazi philosophy


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:14:20 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have a really stupid question of you liberals who are insisting that the statues of Confederate Generals and Confederate War Dead memorials are racist.

If any these represent the forced subjugation of a race (please remember that some of these confederates served with distinction in the War with Mexico) and that is a perfectly good reason to remove these statues and memorials, then there are some others that I would suggest be removed as well.

Statues of General Philip Sheridan, great general in the Union army, burned a lot of white southerners out of their homes and farms, confiscated livestock in his march down the Shenandoah, he also instituted the US Army policy that legitimized the massacres of Native American men, women and children.

Clearly, a man of racist beliefs, famously saying "the only good indian is a dead indian."

So, lets take his statue down.

While we are at it, how about the statue immortalizing Gen. G.A. Custer? While he died with the 7th at little big horn, he also commanded a the 7th during an attack on an Indian village he listed as hostiles (didnt matter they were actually ON the reservation in the Indian Territories at the time.)

How about the statues of every president that authorized the US government's violation of every damn treaty the Government made with Native Americans? Including the ones to President Jackson, who, in defiance of the US Supreme court still ordered the forced removal of the Cherokee and other tribes from the south eastern states?

Not only was the original treaty violated, but thousands died on the trail of tears.

Lee was no saint, neither was Washinton, and Jefferson fathered children with his slaves.

The simple fact is this, the Liberals are great at condemning anything to do with the Confederacy and the civil war, lets destroy the statues, lets tear down the memorials, etc.

But I have yet to see a fucking liberal stand up and make the same statement about 'heroes' who had some really great victories, like the slaughter of starving old men, women and children in the name of "manifest destiny."

The real reason they want these memorials removed is because the south lost.

Yes, hundreds of thousands were held in slavery in the south.

Millions of Native Americans died either directly under the sword of US army troops, or by starvation on reservations with ground so poor weeds were the only thing that would grow and being given rancid beef to eat by a 'benevolent government.'

The men that fought for the south, did so out of the belief they had a justified cause. The men that rode down on defenseless native americans can slaughtered them, cut off dead women's breasts or a brave's scrotum to make tobacco pouches did so because they believed they were supporting a justified cause.

The truth is that both sides, both armies were wrong, the difference is that the North won, the Confederacy and Indians lost.

There is a universal truth, the Victors write the Histories.

Funny thing, a statue of a general, or a memorial to men killed in battle do not honor some racist philosophy, it honors their sacrifice, they died fighting defending their homeland, nothing more, nothing less. The average southern soldier did not come from a slave holding family, or own slaves himself. He was usually a draftee, who did not want to be there in the first place.

It is no different than the war graves of German soldiers from both world wars. Especially in the second world war, the great majority of German soldiers were not Nazi's, hell many of the officers were not Nazi's, but their graves remain undisturbed. Left in piece with the understanding that they died not for a cause, but for home.

Hell people, leave it alone, it happened a 152 years ago, it is history. If you people decide to remove every memorial that tarnishes the history of the US, you are going to be destroying a lot of statues. Many heroes of the Union commanded troops that massacred thousands of Native Americans. Hell almost all of them would have been arrested for crimes against humanity in modern times.

As for the 20th century, Eaker and everyone in the US army air corpse knew that precision daylight bombing was a joke, they knew that for every bomb that fell on the target 10 fell anywhere but the target.

Then there was the firebombing of Japanese cities. Christ, damn near a million Japanese civilians died in those raids.

And please do not forget, only one country in history has used an atomic weapon in anger, the United States.

Let you Liberals who are for this eradication program in on a secret.

At the end of World War Two, the allies were going to put Admiral Karl Dönitz on trial for crimes against humanity for his campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare, along with every surviving uboat officer.

There was one good reason it never happened.

The Commanders of the US Submarine forces in the Pacific went to the war crimes officials and told them that the US followed the same principle in the pacific, sinking warships, transports, freighters, and passenger ships without warning.

Go ahead, erase these men from history, but remember some of the statues are not for their service to the south, but their contributions either before or after the war.

YES !!

Every goddamn one of those statues and symbols should be out of our lives. All we need from those historical figures...are their words and only if they truly inform, enlighten and inspire.

I'll add to the list:

Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon Johnson
Richard Nixon...if any.
Ronald Reagan
Geo. W Bush

I am sure with more thought, more would follow.

You would want homophobes wouldn't you , Like MLK?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:18:24 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have a really stupid question of you liberals who are insisting that the statues of Confederate Generals and Confederate War Dead memorials are racist.

If any these represent the forced subjugation of a race (please remember that some of these confederates served with distinction in the War with Mexico) and that is a perfectly good reason to remove these statues and memorials, then there are some others that I would suggest be removed as well.

Statues of General Philip Sheridan, great general in the Union army, burned a lot of white southerners out of their homes and farms, confiscated livestock in his march down the Shenandoah, he also instituted the US Army policy that legitimized the massacres of Native American men, women and children.

Clearly, a man of racist beliefs, famously saying "the only good indian is a dead indian."

So, lets take his statue down.

While we are at it, how about the statue immortalizing Gen. G.A. Custer? While he died with the 7th at little big horn, he also commanded a the 7th during an attack on an Indian village he listed as hostiles (didnt matter they were actually ON the reservation in the Indian Territories at the time.)

How about the statues of every president that authorized the US government's violation of every damn treaty the Government made with Native Americans? Including the ones to President Jackson, who, in defiance of the US Supreme court still ordered the forced removal of the Cherokee and other tribes from the south eastern states?

Not only was the original treaty violated, but thousands died on the trail of tears.

Lee was no saint, neither was Washinton, and Jefferson fathered children with his slaves.

The simple fact is this, the Liberals are great at condemning anything to do with the Confederacy and the civil war, lets destroy the statues, lets tear down the memorials, etc.

But I have yet to see a fucking liberal stand up and make the same statement about 'heroes' who had some really great victories, like the slaughter of starving old men, women and children in the name of "manifest destiny."

The real reason they want these memorials removed is because the south lost.

Yes, hundreds of thousands were held in slavery in the south.

Millions of Native Americans died either directly under the sword of US army troops, or by starvation on reservations with ground so poor weeds were the only thing that would grow and being given rancid beef to eat by a 'benevolent government.'

The men that fought for the south, did so out of the belief they had a justified cause. The men that rode down on defenseless native americans can slaughtered them, cut off dead women's breasts or a brave's scrotum to make tobacco pouches did so because they believed they were supporting a justified cause.

The truth is that both sides, both armies were wrong, the difference is that the North won, the Confederacy and Indians lost.

There is a universal truth, the Victors write the Histories.

Funny thing, a statue of a general, or a memorial to men killed in battle do not honor some racist philosophy, it honors their sacrifice, they died fighting defending their homeland, nothing more, nothing less. The average southern soldier did not come from a slave holding family, or own slaves himself. He was usually a draftee, who did not want to be there in the first place.

It is no different than the war graves of German soldiers from both world wars. Especially in the second world war, the great majority of German soldiers were not Nazi's, hell many of the officers were not Nazi's, but their graves remain undisturbed. Left in piece with the understanding that they died not for a cause, but for home.

Hell people, leave it alone, it happened a 152 years ago, it is history. If you people decide to remove every memorial that tarnishes the history of the US, you are going to be destroying a lot of statues. Many heroes of the Union commanded troops that massacred thousands of Native Americans. Hell almost all of them would have been arrested for crimes against humanity in modern times.

As for the 20th century, Eaker and everyone in the US army air corpse knew that precision daylight bombing was a joke, they knew that for every bomb that fell on the target 10 fell anywhere but the target.

Then there was the firebombing of Japanese cities. Christ, damn near a million Japanese civilians died in those raids.

And please do not forget, only one country in history has used an atomic weapon in anger, the United States.

Let you Liberals who are for this eradication program in on a secret.

At the end of World War Two, the allies were going to put Admiral Karl Dönitz on trial for crimes against humanity for his campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare, along with every surviving uboat officer.

There was one good reason it never happened.

The Commanders of the US Submarine forces in the Pacific went to the war crimes officials and told them that the US followed the same principle in the pacific, sinking warships, transports, freighters, and passenger ships without warning.

Go ahead, erase these men from history, but remember some of the statues are not for their service to the south, but their contributions either before or after the war.

YES !!

Every goddamn one of those statues and symbols should be out of our lives. All we need from those historical figures...are their words and only if they truly inform, enlighten and inspire.

I'll add to the list:

Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon Johnson
Richard Nixon...if any.
Ronald Reagan
Geo. W Bush

I am sure with more thought, more would follow.

My home town has a statue to shoeless Joe.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:20:45 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I have a really stupid question of you liberals who are insisting that the statues of Confederate Generals and Confederate War Dead memorials are racist.

If any these represent the forced subjugation of a race (please remember that some of these confederates served with distinction in the War with Mexico) and that is a perfectly good reason to remove these statues and memorials, then there are some others that I would suggest be removed as well.

Statues of General Philip Sheridan, great general in the Union army, burned a lot of white southerners out of their homes and farms, confiscated livestock in his march down the Shenandoah, he also instituted the US Army policy that legitimized the massacres of Native American men, women and children.

Clearly, a man of racist beliefs, famously saying "the only good indian is a dead indian."

So, lets take his statue down.

While we are at it, how about the statue immortalizing Gen. G.A. Custer? While he died with the 7th at little big horn, he also commanded a the 7th during an attack on an Indian village he listed as hostiles (didnt matter they were actually ON the reservation in the Indian Territories at the time.)

How about the statues of every president that authorized the US government's violation of every damn treaty the Government made with Native Americans? Including the ones to President Jackson, who, in defiance of the US Supreme court still ordered the forced removal of the Cherokee and other tribes from the south eastern states?

Not only was the original treaty violated, but thousands died on the trail of tears.

Lee was no saint, neither was Washinton, and Jefferson fathered children with his slaves.

The simple fact is this, the Liberals are great at condemning anything to do with the Confederacy and the civil war, lets destroy the statues, lets tear down the memorials, etc.

But I have yet to see a fucking liberal stand up and make the same statement about 'heroes' who had some really great victories, like the slaughter of starving old men, women and children in the name of "manifest destiny."

The real reason they want these memorials removed is because the south lost.

Yes, hundreds of thousands were held in slavery in the south.

Millions of Native Americans died either directly under the sword of US army troops, or by starvation on reservations with ground so poor weeds were the only thing that would grow and being given rancid beef to eat by a 'benevolent government.'

The men that fought for the south, did so out of the belief they had a justified cause. The men that rode down on defenseless native americans can slaughtered them, cut off dead women's breasts or a brave's scrotum to make tobacco pouches did so because they believed they were supporting a justified cause.

The truth is that both sides, both armies were wrong, the difference is that the North won, the Confederacy and Indians lost.

There is a universal truth, the Victors write the Histories.

Funny thing, a statue of a general, or a memorial to men killed in battle do not honor some racist philosophy, it honors their sacrifice, they died fighting defending their homeland, nothing more, nothing less. The average southern soldier did not come from a slave holding family, or own slaves himself. He was usually a draftee, who did not want to be there in the first place.

It is no different than the war graves of German soldiers from both world wars. Especially in the second world war, the great majority of German soldiers were not Nazi's, hell many of the officers were not Nazi's, but their graves remain undisturbed. Left in piece with the understanding that they died not for a cause, but for home.

Hell people, leave it alone, it happened a 152 years ago, it is history. If you people decide to remove every memorial that tarnishes the history of the US, you are going to be destroying a lot of statues. Many heroes of the Union commanded troops that massacred thousands of Native Americans. Hell almost all of them would have been arrested for crimes against humanity in modern times.

As for the 20th century, Eaker and everyone in the US army air corpse knew that precision daylight bombing was a joke, they knew that for every bomb that fell on the target 10 fell anywhere but the target.

Then there was the firebombing of Japanese cities. Christ, damn near a million Japanese civilians died in those raids.

And please do not forget, only one country in history has used an atomic weapon in anger, the United States.

Let you Liberals who are for this eradication program in on a secret.

At the end of World War Two, the allies were going to put Admiral Karl Dönitz on trial for crimes against humanity for his campaign of unrestricted submarine warfare, along with every surviving uboat officer.

There was one good reason it never happened.

The Commanders of the US Submarine forces in the Pacific went to the war crimes officials and told them that the US followed the same principle in the pacific, sinking warships, transports, freighters, and passenger ships without warning.

Go ahead, erase these men from history, but remember some of the statues are not for their service to the south, but their contributions either before or after the war.

YES !!

Every goddamn one of those statues and symbols should be out of our lives. All we need from those historical figures...are their words and only if they truly inform, enlighten and inspire.

I'll add to the list:

Woodrow Wilson
Lyndon Johnson
Richard Nixon...if any.
Ronald Reagan
Geo. W Bush

I am sure with more thought, more would follow.

Why isn't a great and fearless person like you out destroying statues in Georgia the home of more Confederate statues than any other state?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:21:35 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD


You would want homophobes wouldn't you , Like MLK?


Did mlk take up arms against amerika?
Did mlk kill any amerikans?
If not why don't you take your anti amerikan rhetoric and stuff it up your ass.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:24:46 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
]ORIGINAL: BamaD


Why isn't a great and fearless person like you out destroying statues in Georgia the home of more Confederate statues than any other state?


Perhaps because law abiding citizens would prefer to use the legal system while thugs like the nazi/klan would prefer your less that legal methods
of intimidation.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:28:06 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD


You would want homophobes wouldn't you , Like MLK?


Did mlk take up arms against amerika?
Did mlk kill any amerikans?
If not why don't you take your anti amerikan rhetoric and stuff it up your ass.




Just give it time. Everything that gives America it's sense of history and identity will be removed. They will find reasons and use fringe groups to accomplish their goal. This is just the beginning.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:36:33 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: BamaD


You would want homophobes wouldn't you , Like MLK?


Did mlk take up arms against amerika?
Did mlk kill any amerikans?
If not why don't you take your anti amerikan rhetoric and stuff it up your ass.




Just give it time. Everything that gives America it's sense of history and identity will be removed. They will find reasons and use fringe groups to accomplish their goal. This is just the beginning.


Homophobes (anyone disagreeing with their agenda) are already monsters,
MLK's organization received (without his knowledge) money from the Russians
because they caused unrest. I don/t want his statues torn down but the point is everything offends someone.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:37:39 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: tamaka


Just give it time. Everything that gives America it's sense of history and identity will be removed. They will find reasons and use fringe groups to accomplish their goal. This is just the beginning.

Cite please

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:39:24 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: tamaka


Just give it time. Everything that gives America it's sense of history and identity will be removed. They will find reasons and use fringe groups to accomplish their goal. This is just the beginning.

Cite please



Use your own brain for a change instead of relying on everyone else's.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:40:16 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD


Homophobes (anyone disagreeing with their agenda) are already monsters,
MLK's organization received (without his knowledge) money from the Russians
because they caused unrest. I don/t want his statues torn down but the point is everything offends someone.


You claim to be honorably discharged from the ameerikan military yet you support the enemies of the constitution.
Why is that? does your hatred of blacks supersede your patriotism?


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:40:26 AM   
Made2Obey


Posts: 357
Joined: 8/21/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

]ORIGINAL: BamaD


Why isn't a great and fearless person like you out destroying statues in Georgia the home of more Confederate statues than any other state?


Perhaps because law abiding citizens would prefer to use the legal system while thugs like the nazi/klan would prefer your less that legal methods
of intimidation.




Right, and it was law abiding innocents who tore down that statue in Durham, NC last week.
No wait! It was leftist protesters acting outside the law who got arrested and charged for their criminal act.
Law abiding.... Riiiiigggghhhtt.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:43:21 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
MLK's organization received (without his knowledge) money from the Russians

Whereas el presidente knows damned well that Putin is bankrolling him?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:44:32 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline
Tear down all of the statues of men because it is just a reminder of the Patriarchy and how women were subjugated.

(in reply to Made2Obey)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 10:48:13 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Made2Obey
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: BamaD


Why isn't a great and fearless person like you out destroying statues in Georgia the home of more Confederate statues than any other state?


Perhaps because law abiding citizens would prefer to use the legal system while thugs like the nazi/klan would prefer your less that legal methods
of intimidation.




Right, and it was law abiding innocents who tore down that statue in Durham, NC last week.
No wait! It was leftists protesters acting outside the law who got arrested and charged for their criminal act.
Law abiding.... Riiiiigggghhhtt.


Do you mean leftist like jefferson revere hancock and the 'sons of liberty', who burned down the governors mansion and buttfucked him and
his daughters?


(in reply to Made2Obey)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 11:01:14 AM   
Made2Obey


Posts: 357
Joined: 8/21/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Made2Obey
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
ORIGINAL: BamaD


Why isn't a great and fearless person like you out destroying statues in Georgia the home of more Confederate statues than any other state?


Perhaps because law abiding citizens would prefer to use the legal system while thugs like the nazi/klan would prefer your less that legal methods
of intimidation.




Right, and it was law abiding innocents who tore down that statue in Durham, NC last week.
No wait! It was leftists protesters acting outside the law who got arrested and charged for their criminal act.
Law abiding.... Riiiiigggghhhtt.


Do you mean leftist like jefferson revere hancock and the 'sons of liberty', who burned down the governors mansion and buttfucked him and
his daughters?




The thread topic is removal of statues, not the Boston Tea Party (with which you seem a bit obsessed, second time you have drug it into a totally different subject) I know it's difficult for you, but try hard to focus and stay on topic.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting... - 8/17/2017 11:02:08 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
MLK's organization received (without his knowledge) money from the Russians

Whereas el presidente knows damned well that Putin is bankrolling him?

Lie.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Okay, if statues of southern gererals are promoting racism... Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.148